JPC says...

[ImnoMensa]

The use of the Ghandi Avatar by this dipstick is an inexcusable insult to a great man.

I am sure that within 5 minutes of the start of a Washington Post interview with JPC the reporter from the Pinko-commie rag will be heading back to the District laughing his natural azz off.

 

[JPC sr]

The truth will set us all free.

The use of the Ghandi Avatar by this dipstick is an inexcusable insult to a great man.

I am sure that within 5 minutes of the start of a Washington Post interview with JPC the reporter from the Pinko-commie rag will be heading back to the District laughing his natural azz off.

It has turned out that the Washington Post is sending all the candidates an online questionaire that we (I) must fill out before the due date.

They are to send me an access code soon.

So I do not get a reporter and live interview as the local paper did.

And I like Gandhi and he seems to fit me quite well indeed.

 

[This_person]

It has turned out that the Washington Post is sending all the candidates an online questionaire that we (I) must fill out before the due date.

They are to send me an access code soon.

So I do not get a reporter and live interview as the local paper did.

And I like Gandhi and he seems to fit me quite well indeed.

Please let us help you fill it out, so it can be HONEST.

 

[~mellabella~]

It has turned out that the Washington Post is sending all the candidates an online questionaire that we (I) must fill out before the due date.

They are to send me an access code soon.

So I do not get a reporter and live interview as the local paper did.

And I like Gandhi and he seems to fit me quite well indeed.

What kind of questions does it have on it? Care for some help?

 

[Dupontster]

Please let us help you fill it out, so it can be HONEST.

OH, I'm sure he's going to be very honest.......

 

[JPC sr]

The truth will set us all free.

What kind of questions does it have on it? Care for some help?

They have not given it to me yet so I do not know exactly.

However I did do one in 2006 for my campaign to the MD Legislature and (to the best of my memory) it asked us things like my occupation, and marriage status and political questions like applied to the position like transportation, education, etc.

If I remember I will try to copy paste but they are so sensitive that it might be copy right protected and might not allow copies.

They told already that it will take about 30 minutes to fill it out.

========== I do get other things though and here is one I got in email :

Hello James -

Best of luck to you with the upcoming election!

Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Rebecca and I’m with Baltimore Washington Billboards – a “mobile” billboard company in the local area. We have a fleet of trucks serving the entire Mid-Atlantic region. This is one of the most unique and effective ways to advertise now! We actually drive your ad to your target audience where they work, play, dine and shop every day! We can specialize a route specific to your district. People have less and less time to read the paper or mail and with Tivo and satellite radio they are not watching or hearing pricey ads…

Mobile billboards have 97% retention rate!

44,000 impressions per 8 hour day!

People can not throw us away or turn us off or change the channel!

With a mobile billboard, you get 3 ads in 1! 2 sides (which can be different) plus 1 back panel.

We will customize your routes – includes nights (trucks are illuminated) and weekends at no additional cost!

If you are interested, please contact me for more information.

Thanks and Happy holidays.

Maybe I can copy the Wash Post email and post that too.

I will check it out but it will take me a while to do it.

Bye.

 

[This_person]

I figure that I better stick to pro-life and say little about any other topic.

So does not that sound best?

Not sure why you'd not see it as your duty to inform as many as possible through your interview what your message is.

So, in the interest of being helpful, let's give you a practice interview:

What is your stand on the illegal alien issue?​

You've made it clear that you support anyone being here for any reason at any time. You've made it clear that you perceive an illegal alien as having the rights of a full citizen, and that no one has any responsibilities as a citizen.

What is your stand on border security?​

See above, you see no reason for borders, as they are simply needless imaginary lines drawn by thugs.

What is your stand on the Iraq war? Or, the war on terror in general?​

You've made it clear that we all need to follow bin Laden and accept that we must live however he tells us. When he says we are not following our own religion correctly (yes, fellow forumites, I know that's not what he said, but this is Jimmy's belief) and we must change our ways or be killed, we must change our ways and hope that we act as bin Laden demands so he'll stop telling people to kill us. That was what you suggested was his peace offer, and you've made it clear that you think we should follow his demands. Then, all will be good. As for Iraq, we should get out now, ending our "occupation", and let that country run itself - regardless of the consequences to us, or other nations.

What is your view on Mideast Peace process?​

You've made it clear that there can be "no peace until those bastard Jews get out of Palestinian land."

What is the main plank of your platform? What do you most hope to accomplish if elected?​

Two things:

• Repealing any laws that force the brutal government to steal non-custodial parents money from them to give luxuries to their children; while removing any ability for people to divorce until their children are at least a certain age (what age was it, Jimmy? 23?)

• Remove ANY ability for ANYONE to get an abortion EVER. All children are God's gifts to parents, and these children should never be aborted - not in the case of rape, not if the pregnancy is physically harming the mother - never.

What is your stand on the feminist movement?

The woman is the lesser vessal so that if we push them then they break. Put pressure on and they fold. It is not their weakness - it represents their value, link.

What do you think, did I nail your talking points for you?

 

[JPC sr]

The truth will set us all free.

What do you think, did I nail your talking points for you?

Except you missed THE point that I am going to emphasize pro-life and not a bunch of junk.

 

[This_person]

Except you missed THE point that I am going to emphasize pro-life and not a bunch of junk.

Too bad the office you're "running for" doesn't have any jurisdiction over that issue. You must not think that issue important enough to run for an office that has that under its jurisdiction. I'm sure any good reporter or voter will point that out to you, though.

 

[FerretRescue]

It is fine by me if we have different beliefs as most often any two people will have differences.

I have no problem in me standing alone as my boundaries are very secure.

So like do you now say that child support does not need reform? or you just do not want me to help reform it? do you say that my notion of making peace with the terrorist is insane? and you just want more war too?

Or what exactly did T_p tell that makes him look "sane" and me otherwise? or are you just swayed by red karma? and the intimidation coming from the other posters?
==================

And just for the record - I love your new avatar.

Oh I do think child support needs to be reformed. Without a doubt.

I don't agree with the adultry, not granting people a divorce, your ideas on muslims, to start.

 

[PsyOps]

You people leave poor little ole JPC alone.

 

[JPC sr]

The truth will set us all free.

Oh I do think child support needs to be reformed. Without a doubt.

Oh, well that c/s is the main thing, all the other stuff is just side arguements to keep the thread going.

I don't agree with the adultry, not granting people a divorce, your ideas on muslims, to start.

I do not believe there are many people that like adultery committed by others,

and there will always be divorces as I just say we need to give people other options,

but the Muslims I do like and respect.

So I put you back on my okay list.

 

[FerretRescue]

Oh, well that c/s is the main thing, all the other stuff is just side arguements to keep the thread going. I do not believe there are many people that like adultery committed by others,

and there will always be divorces as I just say we need to give people other options,

but the Muslims I do like and respect.

So I put you back on my okay list.

That is the great thing about our world. You dont have to agree with everything to like someone.

 

[This_person]

Oh, well that c/s is the main thing, all the other stuff is just side arguements to keep the thread going.

I thought abortion was the main thing?

Oh, well. The House has nothing to do with either, so you're just wasting everyone's time.

 

[hvp05]

do you say that my notion of making peace with the terrorist is insane?

Uhhhh...

YEAH!​

Every time you act a little normal, you go and say something like this... and remind me how glad I am that you will NEVER, EVER have any public power.

 

[This_person]

So like do you now say that child support does not need reform?

Of course it does. But, your reform is (depending on which time you decided what the reform should be) to either abolish the entire thing, or to give the money to the child, never letting the custodial parent touch the money. Give the three year old the money - that's insane. That's 1

or you just do not want me to help reform it?

You're "running" for the House of Representatives. No authority over child support. Thus, helping you reform it would not happen in reality if you were voted to the House - thinking so is insane. That's 2

do you say that my notion of making peace with the terrorist is insane?

Your notion of making peace, as you wrote it, is to act in the manner the terrorist sees fit, submit to his terror. That's insane. That's 3

and you just want more war too?

No one wants more war. To think someone would is insane. That's 4

Want to pick some other topics?

 

[JPC sr]

The truth will set us all free.

But, your reform is ... to give the money to the child, never letting the custodial parent touch the money. Give the three year old the money - that's insane.

You keep repeating that same dishonest claim and that is not what I said and I never would say such a thing.

It is ONLY insane by the way you are twisting the truth - and it is a fraud.

My idea of giving the child support directly to the child means buying the child the food or clothing that the child needs, and if the child is old enough then giving the child cash is okay.

This attempt of yours to make your claims by dishonest and dishonorable means is because you are honestly unsustainable.

Now is the time of year for higher values and higher words and deeds so from me to you :

Merry x-mas and happy holidays to T_p.

 

[This_person]

My idea of giving the child support directly to the child means buying the child the food or clothing that the child needs, and if the child is old enough then giving the child cash is okay.

That's not support, that's an allowance. There is more to raising a child than food and clothing. There are many difficult to pin-point costs, financially. THAT DOES NOT IMPLY CHILDREN ARE A BURDEN (stated before you can wrongly accuse, again).

You started your forum campaign against any support from non-custodial parent to child by saying per centages of income. (This was, of course, before you said the non-custodial had no moral obligation to the child, and while you've said the only way a child could go without is if the custodial parent is neglectful - implying again the non-custodial parent has no obligation to their child.) What's wrong with sticking with that concept? A reliable support for the child based upon a percentage of what the non-custodial parent has proven he/she can earn?


In the spirit of Christmas, I'll ignore your insult after insult

 

[~mellabella~]

T_P, I find your quote at the bottom of your posts very fitting for this thread!

 

[godsbutterfly]

That's not support, that's an allowance. There is more to raising a child than food and clothing. There are many difficult to pin-point costs, financially. THAT DOES NOT IMPLY CHILDREN ARE A BURDEN (stated before you can wrongly accuse, again).

You started your forum campaign against any support from non-custodial parent to child by saying per centages of income. (This was, of course, before you said the non-custodial had no moral obligation to the child, and while you've said the only way a child could go without is if the custodial parent is neglectful - implying again the non-custodial parent has no obligation to their child.) What's wrong with sticking with that concept? A reliable support for the child based upon a percentage of what the non-custodial parent has proven he/she can earn?


In the spirit of Christmas, I'll ignore your insult after insult

Merry Christmas TP! Wish I could give you some Tylenol thru the Internet!