JPC sr
James P. Cusick Sr.
The truth will set us all free.
Saying the separated parents need to pay a percentage as the Federal law requires is not the same as giving no support as you are twisting it above.
Plus I have my campaign website (link in Signature and in Profile) still says the same thing as I have said from the beginning :
Reform child support and not to destroy it. Change to percentages and stop abusive fixed numbers.
And yes I did say that I would love to destroy your personal dirty little child support abuse and I still hope and pray for that event.
I said, and still say, that no parent and no body is morally obligated to the unjust child support laws, and that says LAWS not their children. They still have legal obligations to pay the c/s and very many parents do indeed submit to the gov forced thievery but it is ONLY by force of law and not from moral stand. It has nothing to do with their regard for their children.
You might not agree and may not like what I say but twisting and changing my words makes you into the fraud and makes you dishonest.
Plus you are saying a "percentage" when you know as I have preached often that the child support is NEVER EVER given as a percentage but ONLY as a hard fixed amount which does violate the given Federal law link HERE and it harms the parents, and criples many parents, and forces many of the parents into crime of defying the injustice.
I know that you are purposely claiming the "percentages" as in the quote above because you already know it is not accurate, and for whatever reason you are supporting or trying to hide the injustice.
You are contradicting in twisting my words.You started your forum campaign against any support from non-custodial parent to child by saying per centages of income.
Saying the separated parents need to pay a percentage as the Federal law requires is not the same as giving no support as you are twisting it above.
Plus I have my campaign website (link in Signature and in Profile) still says the same thing as I have said from the beginning :
Reform child support and not to destroy it. Change to percentages and stop abusive fixed numbers.
And yes I did say that I would love to destroy your personal dirty little child support abuse and I still hope and pray for that event.
Again, this is T_p twisting of my words and it is a fraud and dishonest.(This was, of course, before you said the non-custodial had no moral obligation to the child, and while you've said the only way a child could go without is if the custodial parent is neglectful - implying again the non-custodial parent has no obligation to their child.)
I said, and still say, that no parent and no body is morally obligated to the unjust child support laws, and that says LAWS not their children. They still have legal obligations to pay the c/s and very many parents do indeed submit to the gov forced thievery but it is ONLY by force of law and not from moral stand. It has nothing to do with their regard for their children.
You might not agree and may not like what I say but twisting and changing my words makes you into the fraud and makes you dishonest.
The Courts are corrupted in that the separated parents are presumed as "deadbeats" and the Courts treat them accordingly.What's wrong with sticking with that concept? A reliable support for the child based upon a percentage of what the non-custodial parent has proven he/she can earn?
Plus you are saying a "percentage" when you know as I have preached often that the child support is NEVER EVER given as a percentage but ONLY as a hard fixed amount which does violate the given Federal law link HERE and it harms the parents, and criples many parents, and forces many of the parents into crime of defying the injustice.
I know that you are purposely claiming the "percentages" as in the quote above because you already know it is not accurate, and for whatever reason you are supporting or trying to hide the injustice.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you.In the spirit of Christmas, I'll ignore your insult after insult