I'm somewhat disturbed by the suggestion that a kid "carrying an American flag, wearing an anti-Hillary [Clinton] shirt and a sweater with a Confederate logo on the arms" might be arrested. The Enterprise news article said the student wasn't arrested, but why even put that in there? It suggests that the Empty reporter thinks that should have been considered.
Then there's this:
Smith said the student’s actions were inappropriate, and was addressed by a deputy at the football game and escorted away from the visitors side of the stadium. He said school staff met Friday morning with the boy, who was not arrested following the incident at the game.
Um, why was any of that "inappropriate" and why would it warrant "meeting with the boy"? Is it now against school policy to be anti-Hillary? Was it the "Confederate logo", whatever that means? (I am unaware that the Confederate Army even had a "logo".)
It is also suggested that wearing a mask of our President would be inappropriate. Wow, really? What the hell is going on at that school??
Then there's this:
Smith said the student’s actions were inappropriate, and was addressed by a deputy at the football game and escorted away from the visitors side of the stadium. He said school staff met Friday morning with the boy, who was not arrested following the incident at the game.
Um, why was any of that "inappropriate" and why would it warrant "meeting with the boy"? Is it now against school policy to be anti-Hillary? Was it the "Confederate logo", whatever that means? (I am unaware that the Confederate Army even had a "logo".)
It is also suggested that wearing a mask of our President would be inappropriate. Wow, really? What the hell is going on at that school??