IIRC he wasnt making money off air america, he was working for freeOriginally posted by FromTexas
I guess he needs to sell more books now that Air America went under so fast.
Originally posted by Spoiled
IIRC he wasnt making money off air america, he was working for free
He hasnt said its anything but biased... he openly says its a liberal broadcast.... more than one can say about fox and its conservative tendanciesOriginally posted by FromTexas
Which appropriately shows his severe bent to the far left. He will sell his crap for free.
This will be nothing more than a severly biased, Michael Moorish type work.
Originally posted by Spoiled
He hasnt said its anything but biased... he openly says its a liberal broadcast.... more than one can say about fox and its conservative tendancies
For real. They act like it's Rush Limbaugh or something. But I find Fox to be VERY fair and balanced, just like they say. We're just so brainwashed by the mainstream media that we think if the anchor isn't foaming at the mouth over Bush, they must be a bunch of right-wingers.Originally posted by Christy
What is it about Fox that gets lib panties in such a knot?
Originally posted by Christy
What is it about Fox that gets lib panties in such a knot? I mean for cryin out loud, conservatives have had to endure the propaganda spewed from CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and PBS for decades. Don't watch it if you don't like it, just like I don't read liberal propaganda. :shrug:
Speaking for myself, I don't go to Fox because it's some bastion of right-wingery. I go because I get tired of the liberal slant CNN puts on everything.Originally posted by SmallTown
It is a common known fact that Fox News is where the conservatives go to get their news, and one of the few places they go.
Originally posted by vraiblonde
So it's not fair to say that because Fox has a big conservative audience, that means it's a big conservative news channel. Maybe we just want the news without the anchor interjecting their personal opinion.
Originally posted by SmallTown
Thats one thing I always find interesting. It is a common known fact that Fox News is where the conservatives go to get their news, and one of the few places they go. They will always brag about Fox News being the most widely watched news network. Sure, the ratings are there, but when you actually look at it the conservatives are all tuning in to fox, where as the liberals spread themselves over all the other channels based on personal preference. It would be interesting to see how the fox news ratings would be if more conservative channels started popping up. Or if some of the liberal news outlets either went away or merged
Originally posted by Christy
ST, I've probably had more real life dealings with how the liberal media flat out lies and spins any story to fit their agenda, than anybody else on here. Your theory doesn't hold water.
:dingdingdingdingding:Originally posted by SmallTown
But only because of limited venues for conservatives to go
Originally posted by SmallTown
No theory at all Just the fact that most conservatives flock to Fox, while libs go for all of the other channels.
ALL liberals are "conservative" when it comes to money. Do you think Barbra Streisand is going to give all her money away to charity and live like a normal person? No.Originally posted by Spoiled
when it comes to money they are infact conservative...
Originally posted by vraiblonde
:dingdingdingdingding:
But that doesn't mean Fox is conservative - it just means it's not liberal.
Originally posted by Spoiled
all these points are addressed in the book, including how the majority of these channels arent liberal and when it comes to money they are infact conservative...
You indicate that, because conservatives like Fox, that must mean it's a conservative news source. I'm simply saying that it's not a conservative news source. It's a fair and balanced news source. The thing that makes people think it's "conservative" is because it's "not liberal" like the rest of them.Originally posted by SmallTown
And you have agreed with that statement, so I don't know what exactly the conservs here are questioning?