Lock Her Up! Lock Her up!

S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
What is happening to Trump now is exactly what Trump told you he was going to do to Hillary when he won.

Instead nothing happened because there was no evidence and she was never charged with anything.

Also Trump used it as a tool to lie to you and rile you up. Just like they are doing now with the groomer/Pedo nonsense.

It turns out however there is tons of evidence, video, tape and photographic evidence.

Yet now you claim it is unfair and somehow Biden is attacking his political opponents.


Does anything in your head ever make logical sense?

Is it possible for you to be ethically and morally consistent?

How can you conflate the two things?
 
L

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
StmarysCity79 said:
What is happening to Trump now is exactly what Trump told you he was going to do to Hillary when he won.

Instead nothing happened because there was no evidence and she was never charged with anything.

Also Trump used it as a tool to lie to you and rile you up. Just like they are doing now with the groomer/Pedo nonsense.

It turns out however there is tons of evidence, video, tape and photographic evidence.

Yet now you claim it is unfair and somehow Biden is attacking his political opponents.


Does anything in your head ever make logical sense?

Is it possible for you to be ethically and morally consistent?

How can you conflate the two things?
Click to expand...
Hammered Blackberrys (destruction of evidence, destruction of gov't property), Whitewashed hard drives after they were told to hold everything, unknown private server in her house. You are right, conflating the two is wrong.
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
limblips said:
Hammered Blackberrys (destruction of evidence, destruction of gov't property), Whitewashed hard drives after they were told to hold everything, unknown private server in her house. You are right, conflating the two is wrong.
Click to expand...

How come only idiots like you have this evidence? And it doesn't appear anywhere else? And there are no charging documents or indicment?

Why didn't Trump lock her up then?
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
StmarysCity79 said:
Instead nothing happened because there was no evidence and she was never charged with anything.
Click to expand...
Are you insane? Literally tons of evidence.

www.factcheck.org

Clinton's Handling of Classified Information - FactCheck.org

An FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information resulted in no criminal charges, but it revealed that Clinton and her campaign made past statements that have turned out to be false or misleading.
www.factcheck.org www.factcheck.org

She received and sent classified through a private email account, and this information was kept on a private server with NO oversight. And that's just the stuff we know about. Who know what was lost in the physical and electronic destruction her people carried out knowing full well those things would be sought.

I'm not a fan of Trump, but to say Hillary got off because there was no evidence it wrong. She got off because the system didn't want to be seen interfering in an election at best. At worst, its the system defending its own.
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
StmarysCity79 said:
How come only idiots like you have this evidence? And it doesn't appear anywhere else? And there are no charging documents or indicment?

Why didn't Trump lock her up then?
Click to expand...

Well, we might have to just agree that idiots had the evidence...... The knowledge of hammers being used to destroy devices was from the FBI. Everything they did was illegal, and the bullsh^% fig leaf of intent was just that, a fig leaf.


www.newsweek.com

Fact Check—Did Hillary Clinton use hammer to destroy email server evidence?

Rep. Nancy Mace claimed the former presidential candidate "used a hammer to destroy evidence of a private email server and classified information."
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
glhs837 said:
Are you insane? Literally tons of evidence.

www.factcheck.org

Clinton's Handling of Classified Information - FactCheck.org

An FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information resulted in no criminal charges, but it revealed that Clinton and her campaign made past statements that have turned out to be false or misleading.
www.factcheck.org www.factcheck.org

She received and sent classified through a private email account, and this information was kept on a private server with NO oversight. And that's just the stuff we know about. Who know what was lost in the physical and electronic destruction her people carried out knowing full well those things would be sought.

I'm not a fan of Trump, but to say Hillary got off because there was no evidence it wrong. She got off because the system didn't want to be seen interfering in an election at best. At worst, its the system defending its own.
Click to expand...


So why didn't Trump charge her when he was president?

"(Most emails were retroactively deemed to contain classified information by the U.S. agencies from which the information originated.)"

Your link says nothing about bleachbit or any of the other nonsense claimed that she did to "cover up" the crime.

The two situation are in no way the same.

Trump is on tape admitting he is sharing Top secret information he should not be sharing.
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
glhs837 said:
Well, we might have to just agree that idiots had the evidence...... The knowledge of hammers being used to destroy devices was from the FBI. Everything they did was illegal, and the bullsh^% fig leaf of intent was just that, a fig leaf.


www.newsweek.com

Fact Check—Did Hillary Clinton use hammer to destroy email server evidence?

Rep. Nancy Mace claimed the former presidential candidate "used a hammer to destroy evidence of a private email server and classified information."
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...


You mean this?

Don't you think that is how they should be handled if they are obsolete but may have sensitive info on them? That is literally how they tell you to destroy old harddrives and sim cards

" the FBI states that Justin Cooper, a senior aide to Clinton, "did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton's old mobile phone devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."
 
O

ontheriver

Well-Known Member
StmarysCity79 said:
You mean this?

Don't you think that is how they should be handled if they are obsolete but may have sensitive info on them? That is literally how they tell you to destroy old harddrives and sim cards

" the FBI states that Justin Cooper, a senior aide to Clinton, "did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton's old mobile phone devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."
Click to expand...
I have not missed you at all. Idiot.
 
L

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
StmarysCity79 said:
You mean this?

Don't you think that is how they should be handled if they are obsolete but may have sensitive info on them? That is literally how they tell you to destroy old harddrives and sim cards

" the FBI states that Justin Cooper, a senior aide to Clinton, "did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton's old mobile phone devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."
Click to expand...
Please stop talking about things you obviously have no knowledge of. I certainly hope you have no classified access. HDDs, SIM cards, secured flash drives, and other classified (or potentially classified) hardware is sometimes destroyed by smashing, shredding, or otherwise destroyed as to make it totally unrecoverable. But wait Bucko, before you say "I told you so!" You need to know that the destruction must be carried out under very specific rules. There is also a detailed record of destruction which includes sernos, personnel names and authority, etc... The only time this doesn't apply is when the material is in immediate danger of being compromised such as an embassy being overrun..... Nothing of the such applied to Clinton and her cronies. Now before you say that there was only "personal data" on the devices remember that anything that touches a classified system becomes classified by default. The FBI clearly stated she had classified data on her unauthorized personal server ergo.....

Now go back to mommies basement and spank yourself for being stupid
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
StmarysCity79 said:
You mean this?

Don't you think that is how they should be handled if they are obsolete but may have sensitive info on them? That is literally how they tell you to destroy old harddrives and sim cards

" the FBI states that Justin Cooper, a senior aide to Clinton, "did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton's old mobile phone devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."
Click to expand...


See what LB wrote above. There are literally laws that govern ALL of this. Access, control,, maintenance, and declassification and destruction. And they literally broke EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. And yes, I know a bit about classified and its care and feeding. Comey waved his "nobody would prosecute it" wand to make it go away. That doesnt make it legal or right.

Military members have served jail time for far less.
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Monello said:
Comey said she broke the law but didn't think any prosecutor would take the case. So it didn't go to a grand jury.
Click to expand...

So why didnt Trump have her charged? If you think Biden is somehow controlling the DOJ to indite Trump Why didnt Trump do the same to Hillary after he appointed Christopher Wray?
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
glhs837 said:
See what LB wrote above. There are literally laws that govern ALL of this. Access, control,, maintenance, and declassification and destruction. And they literally broke EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. And yes, I know a bit about classified and its care and feeding. Comey waved his "nobody would prosecute it" wand to make it go away. That doesnt make it legal or right.

Military members have served jail time for far less.
Click to expand...


So then you must be outraged by what Trump has done and is on tape admitting to correct?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top