Lock Her Up! Lock Her up!

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
"Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent."

" i should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed"

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

"As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."


It is literally in Comey's statement which i am sure you never took the time to read.

Comey. bwa ha ha ha haaaa
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Way to miss the most important bits.

1. Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system - Knowingly placing classified information onto a personal electronic device is a ****ING CRIME!!!! And yes, she knew she had a personal server. And these were not cleared by State, nor were they turned into State for proper declassification/destruction when they were removed from service. These are ****ING CRIMES!!!!!

2. "From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

Number 2 is the real deal. Let me receive and forward just one Top Secret document on my Gmail and watch me lose my freaking job. Eight of them? Yeah, I'm doing time.


You asked me about the up classified emails and i responded.

Then i showed you exactly what Comey's statement was on why they didn't recommend charging her.

Your beef is with Comey not me.

And again if you want to see Hillary charged why don't you want Trump charged for his much worse crimes?

Also get over it. Comey didn't recommend charges, Trump had four years to do something about it and didnt.

You continue to be angry at the wrong people.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
You asked me about the up classified emails and i responded.

Then i showed you exactly what Comey's statement was on why they didn't recommend charging her.

Your beef is with Comey not me.

And again if you want to see Hillary charged why don't you want Trump charged for his much worse crimes?

Also get over it. Comey didn't recommend charges, Trump had four years to do something about it and didnt.

You continue to be angry at the wrong people.
Nope, my beef with you is either your willful ignorance of the crimes she committed, or your outright lying about them if you did know. You were the one who mentioned up classified, I never did. I said she had classified on private servers and she did, as stated right in Comeys statement. Top Secret and Secret, at the time she had it, no up classified later. Did Clinton intend to expose Top Secret information to adversaries? I don't think so. But for her own convenience she placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was.

Not being charged with a crime is not the same as being innocent of that crime.

I get angry when people get to walk away from crimes they have committed. Has Trump done so?
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Nope, my beef with you is either your willful ignorance of the crimes she committed, or your outright lying about them if you did know. You were the one who mentioned up classified, I never did. I said she had classified on private servers and she did, as stated right in Comeys statement. Top Secret and Secret, at the time she had it, no up classified later. Did Clinton intend to expose Top Secret information to adversaries? I don't think so. But for her own convenience she placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was.

Not being charged with a crime is not the same as being innocent of that crime.

I get angry when people get to walk away from crimes they have committed. Has Trump done so?
It’s an outright lie.

All Democrats are compulsive crap bag liars.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Nope, my beef with you is either your willful ignorance of the crimes she committed, or your outright lying about them if you did know. You were the one who mentioned up classified, I never did. I said she had classified on private servers and she did, as stated right in Comeys statement. Top Secret and Secret, at the time she had it, no up classified later. Did Clinton intend to expose Top Secret information to adversaries? I don't think so. But for her own convenience she placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was.

Not being charged with a crime is not the same as being innocent of that crime.

I get angry when people get to walk away from crimes they have committed. Has Trump done so?


"he placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was."

Now you finally understand the issue with what Trump did.

The difference is Hillary did not do it intentionally as far as Comey and the FBI can tell.

Trump did and refused to return the materials for over a year.

And is on tape admitting he knows he shouldn't be sharing them but is going to do so anyway.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Screen Shot 2023-06-16 at 1.05.51 PM.png
 

gemma_rae

Well-Known Member
"he placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was."

Now you finally understand the issue with what Trump did.

The difference is Hillary did not do it intentionally as far as Comey and the FBI can tell.

Trump did and refused to return the materials for over a year.

And is on tape admitting he knows he shouldn't be sharing them but is going to do so anyway.
Make sure you stock up on Bud Light for Junetenth. You're going to be mighty thirsty after choking on that Pretzel Logic of yours.
drunk woman GIF
 

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
What is happening to Trump now is exactly what Trump told you he was going to do to Hillary when he won.

Instead nothing happened because there was no evidence and she was never charged with anything.

Also Trump used it as a tool to lie to you and rile you up. Just like they are doing now with the groomer/Pedo nonsense.

It turns out however there is tons of evidence, video, tape and photographic evidence.

Yet now you claim it is unfair and somehow Biden is attacking his political opponents.


Does anything in your head ever make logical sense?

Is it possible for you to be ethically and morally consistent?

How can you conflate the two things?
What about bidens documents I guess they dont count
 

glhs837

Power with Control
"he placed that information in a place where it was so easily accessible, we cant even tell if it was."

Now you finally understand the issue with what Trump did.

The difference is Hillary did not do it intentionally as far as Comey and the FBI can tell.

Trump did and refused to return the materials for over a year.

And is on tape admitting he knows he shouldn't be sharing them but is going to do so anyway.

You keep talking about Trump. I've not talked about him at all. There was never an "intention" clause in the laws regarding the safeguarding of classified.
 

LtownTaxpayer

Active Member
So why did Hunter plead guilty yesterday?

You would think Biden would intervene with his magical powers huh?
Biden can't risk a pardon this close to the election. If Hunter's baby mama hadn't pushed the child support issue with a judge that has no patience for his crap, this would probably have kept going and possibly impacting the campaign/election. Hunter settled out of court for child support. The discovery for that would have been a treasure trove of info.
 

LtownTaxpayer

Active Member
You asked me about the up classified emails and i responded.

Then i showed you exactly what Comey's statement was on why they didn't recommend charging her.

Your beef is with Comey not me.

And again if you want to see Hillary charged why don't you want Trump charged for his much worse crimes?

Also get over it. Comey didn't recommend charges, Trump had four years to do something about it and didnt.

You continue to be angry at the wrong people.
Exposing classified information on an unsecured server connected to the public internet has the potential for many more eyes to view the material than what was discovered locked up with Trump. Not giving any public agency the opportunity to conduct a forensic examination of the server makes it even worse. Having Jake Sullivan cut off the headers and footers of classified documents so they could be faxed or scanned on unclassified equipment is wrong. The bullshit excuse that classified material wasn't marked classified is just that bullshit. As a primary classifier, she should have been able to identify classified material - even if it wasn't marked. Or she wasn't actually fit to be Secretary of State. Additionally she signed an NDA that flat out states if she violates it - even unintentially - it renders her unfit for public office.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Biden can't risk a pardon this close to the election. If Hunter's baby mama hadn't pushed the child support issue with a judge that has no patience for his crap, this would probably have kept going and possibly impacting the campaign/election. Hunter settled out of court for child support. The discovery for that would have been a treasure trove of info.

Biden can attack a political opponent with the help of the FBI but he cant risk helping his son out politically?

Do you think before you type? Does this all make sense in your head somehow?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Documents that he never should have in his possession outside of a SCIF. The papers in his possession were from his time in the Senate and VP.


You seem pretty mad about that but are quite silent on Trump doing far worse. You do know all the document the FBI begged Trump for before the raid should have never left a SCIF either right?


And that Trump is on tape saying i shouldn't show this to you it is illegal but i am going to do it anyway.
 
Top