Looks like we're in WW3 soon...
- Thread starter TWLs wife
- Start date
K
Kain99
Guest
Pretty scary stuff Tig! It'll be ok. 
K
Kain99
Guest
The news says stuff for ratings! Don't even pay attention to that mess.TWL's wife said:But what the news saying it could turn to WW3 at anytime. It's truly scarey.
bcp
In My Opinion
Honestly?TWL's wife said:
I think that it is a very real threat.
I think that the muslims, or at least a portion of them are trying to start world war. And I also think that the only way to diffuse the situation at this point is for the world to turn their backs on Isreal as far as financial and military backing go.
The problem with doing that is that it will only serve to make the muslim faction in question stronger and more of a threat in the future.
B
Bruzilla
Guest
Newt Gingrich is responsible for the WW3 talk, but Lebanon is just a small part of that. He talks about the fighting in Iraq, the potential fighting in N. Korea and Iran, the attacks in Indonesia and Great Britain, and the fighting in Lebanon to inder that TT3 has started.
I don't see the Lebanese action as leading to anything major as Iran is the only country that's come out on the side of Hezbollah... which is no big surprise since they control them.
I don't see the Lebanese action as leading to anything major as Iran is the only country that's come out on the side of Hezbollah... which is no big surprise since they control them.
I am completely against that. Our anti-Semitic United Nations has issued a statement condemning Israel for "human rights violations" in going after Hezbollah in Lebanon. But when these terrorists attack Israeli civilians, they are deafeningly silent.bcp said:
If you're a democratic country with a representative government, the UN hates your guts and uses any excuse to denounce you.
If you're a military dictatorship, they'll reward you with seats on their Human Rights Commissions.
This Lebanon thing is part of the War on Tara and we should back Israel as much as possible. I know we're stretched thin, but somebody has to stand up for what's right in this world.
Purplefox
I AM an enigma
I agree with VRAIBLONDE.
The UN is so corrupted, it needs to go the way of the League of Nations and be dismantled. They are worthless. Worse than worthless, they are a sick joke.
Also, I am sick of Islam being sited as "the religion of peace"....more like the religion of pieces.....
I say, get the CNN's and MSNBC's out of Israel and let them do what they need to do. Scorched earth policy.
By the way, I am new at posting, so if I screw up, just let me know. My skin is pretty thick and I can take it!
The UN is so corrupted, it needs to go the way of the League of Nations and be dismantled. They are worthless. Worse than worthless, they are a sick joke.
Also, I am sick of Islam being sited as "the religion of peace"....more like the religion of pieces.....
I say, get the CNN's and MSNBC's out of Israel and let them do what they need to do. Scorched earth policy.
By the way, I am new at posting, so if I screw up, just let me know. My skin is pretty thick and I can take it!
Bavarian
New Member
So, you want WWIII! You want the loss of lives, both military and civilian, you want the destruction of cities around the world. Have you ever seen either in person or on photographs what Europe looked like during and after the Second World War? Only people who have no sense of history would say "bring it on!"bcp said:
bring it on.
Parts of Europe are still rebuilding from the last World War.
hvp05
Methodically disorganized
Bavarian said:
If the terrorists - be they a rogue, nebulous group or a defined country - are not planning on backing down, but actually planning more attacks, rationalizing with them is not likely to be effective. You may not believe this, but only by being totally prepared can we minimize collateral damage... and the war might actually end sooner.
Let me point something out to you:Bavarian said:
Had Europe been paying attention to Hitler and not turned a blind eye, saying "it's not our problem" there wouldn't have BEEN a WWII. If Great Britain and the rest of the European countries had nipped it in the bud, Hitler wouldn't have been bold enough to waltz right into their countries.
It's also worth noting that the Munich Agreement had the exact opposite outcome than ol' Neville Chamberlain had anticipated. Chamberlain appeased Germany and rolled over like a dog, only to have Hitler go "HA" and invade the rest of Czechoslovakia before moving on to Poland.
You could use a good history lesson, pal. What we're doing right now is trying to PREVENT WWIII. And, frankly, had this crap been checked years ago, it wouldn't have gotten this far. But the UN has this policy of appeasement, even though that has never worked with aggressive rabid dogs in the past. And now there are Leftist nutjobs in this country who think the same thing, even though they're on the wrong side of history.
Read up, buddy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_2
And don't even go there.
bcp
In My Opinion
willie said:
* Besides the roughly $8 billion in annual taxpayer money to Israel, there are hard to track forms of aid which have been causing great economic losses to the American people. According to the Central Bank of Israel, in the 1980's the US bailed out the Israeli banking system at a cost of $10-12 billion in military and economic aids. Congressional researchers disclose that this money was never paid back, and has been forgiven by the American government.
* The US's trade deficit with Israel is about $5-5.5 billion. This is due to trade imbalance between both countries. While the US pays real money for imports from Israel, Israel does not pay real money for its imports from the US. This costs the American people an equivalence of a quarter million jobs.
* In a similar manner, there are great losses to American military institutions. For every dollar of military equipment the US gives Israel, the US buys 60 cents worth of Israeli equipment. Only the difference here is that the US pays with real money, but Israel does not.
* The Oil Supplies Guarantee affirms that if Israel's oil supply is to be cut off for any political or economic reason, the US guarantees to provide Israel with oil regardless of the US oil supply levels. This guarantee carries with it a potential price tag of $20-30 million a day.
and dont forget that little issue of the whole middle east having a bug up their butt for us because of our support of Isreal.
had we not been supporting Isreal and feeding them weapons all these years, we would still have cheap gas, the twin towers and we wouldnt be sending our troops into other countries to try and clean this mess up.
Thats just my thoughts on the subject.
bcp
In My Opinion
Bavarian said:
Psssssst
that post was kinda tounge in cheek.
No I do not wish for WW3, but at this point I am failing to see how the world can avoid it without allowing Isreal to either exist or not exist on its own.
cold fact there but I think its true. its not the middle east against the world, its the middle east against Isreal,,,,, and whomever decides to help them.
I disagree with this. We give money and military aid to Arab countries just as much as we've given to Israel, either directly or indirectly. That's why the Jordanians pretend to help us hunt terrorists.bcp said:
I'm willing to stand corrected on this, but their problem isn't our support of Israel. ObL was pretty clear what the problem is: the US is a force of evil that brings corruption to the Islamic world. They'd all be peachy keen if it weren't for us and our hedonistic western ways influencing their women and young people.