Perhaps she has a mouse in her pocket?Who is "We"?
![Shrug :sshrug: :sshrug:](/styles/somd_smilies/shrug.gif)
Perhaps she has a mouse in her pocket?Who is "We"?
Nope. It's just another cross some of us have to bear.Has any guy ever considered that?
Who is "We"?
If they only realized what an unmitigated disaster it would be. Wonder how the numbers have changed in four years.![]()
70 percent of Americans support ‘Medicare for all’ proposal
Seventy percent said they supported providing “Medicare for all,” also known as single-payer health care, for Americans, according to a new American Barometer survey. The poll, con…thehill.com
AOC isn’t talking about Afghanistan, grassroot progressives are, over 20k likes, a conservative blogger would kill for those numbersI don't make the rules. AOC IS the leading progressive voice in this country. You don't have to like it, but it is a fact.
AOC isn’t talking about Afghanistan, grassroot progressives are, over 20k likes, a conservative blogger would kill for those numbers
Literally no one under 40 watches tv news, it may seem absurd to you, but I’m curious what the rising generation is focused on and it’s not what kind of boots m&ms are wearing.If you're trying to convince me that some rando twitter account is more influential than AOC, you are batshit crazy.
zei_squirrel isn't a member of Congress involved in making our laws and policies. I don't see zei_squirrel all over the TV and internet getting her ass kissed by the Marxist press.
This is easily the most absurd thing I've seen all day. Congratulations.![]()
The California Raisins were White Supremacists?Didn't we have this conversation about the California raisins??? you racist nutheads!!!
Literally no one under 40 watches tv news,
That is simply not true. When you start your post with nonsense I don't even read the rest of it.
16% of the younger generation get their news from television, compared to 68% of those over 65, seems pretty clear cut to meThat is simply not true. When you start your post with nonsense I don't even read the rest of it.
About half or more of adults 50 and older are still turning to TV for news often – 54% of those 50 to 64 and about two-thirds (68%) of those 65 and older. But among those ages 30 to 49, just a quarter say they get news on TV often, and just 16% say the same among those 18 to 29. For those age groups, digital devices are the dominant choice for news, with 67% of those 30 to 49 and 71% of those 18 to 29 getting news from a digital device often.
16% of the younger generation get their news from television, compared to 68% of those over 65, seems pretty clear cut to me
![]()
More than eight-in-ten Americans get news from digital devices
More than eight-in-ten U.S. adults say they get news from a smartphone, computer or tablet “often” or “sometimes.”www.pewresearch.org
I don’t know anyone that watches tv news either, I just felt the need to post this since there is a lot of chatter on this place about whatever Tucker mentioned on his nightly newscast, but I know the age of this forum skews much more toward that 65+ range.I guess the fact that I'm only 63 probably explains why I get 99% of my news from sources other than TV "news" sources. Will that dramatically change when I turn 65? Is there a pill they give me?
So this means you're among friends, boomer.I don’t know anyone that watches tv news either, I just felt the need to post this since there is a lot of chatter on this place about whatever Tucker mentioned on his nightly newscast, but I know the age of this forum skews much more toward that 65+ range.
whatever Tucker mentioned on his nightly newscast,
Its a suppository.Is there a pill they give me?
oh goody.Its a suppository.
The same place CNN gets their stories.oh goody.