Makes you wonder.... (paging mAlice!)
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
Dozens of times ...27 times on the airplane alone. Do run along, moron..your stupidity is beyond tedious and you have zero skill at debating any subject. You are a complete loser...plain and simply...and permanently.
BOP
Well-Known Member
I'd bet money that your momma used to drop you on your head, just to watch you bounce. There's no other explanation that makes sense.
This_person
Well-Known Member
I'm not refusing to admit it. I'm saying it's got to be one way or the other.
If you look at the evidence of Guy A saying Guy B likes young women, and think that means Guy A acknowledges Guy B is a pedophile, you're an idiot (not you personally, speaking in generalities here).
If you think being on the island as a guest without protection where kids are sex slaves and being raped is reason to assume the guest is a pedophile, you're an idiot - BUT, that's a lot more reason to investigate, because it doesn't prove the connection, but it's far more suspect.
I would not claim Clinton or Trump are pedophiles based on the evidence shown. But, I would investigate Clinton, and probably wouldn't investigate Trump. At the very least, I would look at Trump's record of going to the police over Epstein when Trump had reason to believe Epstein was a pedophile and sexual predator, and really think his involvement in a sex ring is highly unlikely.
Then, I'd look at Clinton actually being on the suspect island, donations to the foundation, giving up SS protection, etc., and say, "this is a person of interest."
Having their names in little black books is damning to both.
There are other things damning to both, and other things assisting both.
Sappy can't see that. Sappy loves the Clintons. So, Sappy can't acknowledge that there is evidence for and against both. Sappy can only say Trump is clearly a pedophile, and Clinton is just a guy who knew a guy.
That's stupid, and that's hypocritical. But, that's Sappy.
As for others, I can only take on so much bullshit at a time. When I went after Hijinx for "jungle fever", I didn't touch Sappy's stupid comments. I'm only one man, and can only do so much.
Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Perhaps another angle in the larger story...?
www.dailymail.co.uk
Don't let the article title fool you; this story will be fly paper to folks of all (political) persuasions. As far as the article's title, my point is to wonder if Clinton's statement of completely cutting ties with Epstein can hold up.
--- End of line (MCP)
Bill Clinton pictured with social fixer at Chelsea's wedding
This is the society fixer alleged to have helped find underage girls for pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein - helping Bill Clinton celebrate his daughter's marriage.
Don't let the article title fool you; this story will be fly paper to folks of all (political) persuasions. As far as the article's title, my point is to wonder if Clinton's statement of completely cutting ties with Epstein can hold up.
--- End of line (MCP)
This_person
Well-Known Member
I don't assume the worst, that's not what Trump said, and I deny nothing.
There's damning evidence for both. There's helpful evidence to both.
Taken in totality, I find it highly unlikely Trump is in any way involved in a pedophile sex trafficking ring. Taken in totality, I would investigate Clinton. That is not to say that if they wanted to investigate Trump that I would object - indeed, I would have no problem with it. But, if I were to figure out how to spend the investigator's time wisely, I wouldn't choose the guy who turned Epstein into the police previously; I'd choose (among the many) the guys who went to the island to investigate.
Doesn't that just make common sense?
This_person
Well-Known Member
This story is going to be so full of angles as to be unrecognizable in a very short period of time.Perhaps another angle in the larger story...?
Bill Clinton pictured with social fixer at Chelsea's wedding
This is the society fixer alleged to have helped find underage girls for pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein - helping Bill Clinton celebrate his daughter's marriage.
Don't let the article title fool you; this story will be fly paper to folks of all (political) persuasions. As far as the article's title, my point is to wonder if Clinton's statement of completely cutting ties with Epstein can hold up.
--- End of line (MCP)
Then people won't be able to tell fact from fiction, and go back to caring whether Kanye and Kim are happy as a couple, because they can understand that topic.
There is no damning evidence for Trump other then flying on a plane and visiting an island.
Trump said in his own words " the girls were so young i thought they were children"
You are ascribing them equal weight where any person with half a brain would describe Trumps statement as damning and indicative of his knowledge of his terrific guy friends pedophilia.
Again, for someone not defending Trump you are doing a lot of defending of Trump and his admission that his friend is a pedophile.
We also have sworn statements that Trump and Epstein repeatedly raped a 13 year old but hey let's investigate Bill because you think it makes more sense.
That is YOUR Emotional Response to someone you are politically opposed ti
Yeah So What ......
Prove it
This_person
Well-Known Member
I take my comment about Job back.
Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo and ASSUMPTION
WTF are you talking about
Ad Hominem
You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.
Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Last edited:
I think a good smiting is more inline.
... And now you have.
Sad that you have those kinds of friends... Bear in mind, you are judged by the company you keep.