(a) Well, I'm sure if they could have planned for it they might have had a different "optic" for the news media. But life comes at you fast and you deal with the situation at hand.
(b) Too bad the press doesn't cover for them the way they do for the rioters and violent criminals. Oh, and the Democrats.
(a) Not disagreeing; life does come at one fast. My point is that this is a similar "optics" problem to what the U.S. faced in the early days of the Iraq occupation. Just like the soldiers (then) the police (now) were/are trained to do a certain job and when forced to switch it up look(ed) clumsy. I would hope that the police had planned for this type of work in the department's training because in situations like this - when tensions and adrenaline run high - it's only training that keeps the mistakes to a minimum.
I guess that's the operative word - "minimum." "Zero mistakes" isn't remotely achievable (which is unfortunate because one thing we can all be sure of is that when the clumsiness occurs there's absolute certainty the MSM and "police opponents" will immediately pounce). I'd be curious to know what the training was; regardless, I hope the police union gets involved because these officers were - I think - wrongly charged and are being offered up as scapegoats (like the "other 3" in the Floyd incident).
I think the dude deserved every bit of the shove he got. Sorry's he's in the hospital, but at the macro level he's the one who put himself there. Having said that, the police have to remember they are playing to a far larger audience; one that will scrutinize - fairly or unfairly - every move they make. Why I keep thinking, "training, training, training."
Sorry for the long-winded reply. Mulling over the whole incident a bit.
(b) Absolutely, 100% agree.
--- End of line (MCP)