Clem72
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
MGT vs. AOC & Crockett
- Thread starter RoseRed
- Start date
That's why the ghetto squad had to start screeching and create a distraction.
See, and I like MTG for the most part. She's at her best when making the progbots cry.
They took it down.
Link no work.
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Meanwhile in Taiwan
Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
But she didn’t, she screwed it up.And Lauren Boebert making the sign of the cross.
Do you even know what you’re talking about?
Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
No they aren’t, it’s less than 200k a member, we get what we pay for
Most base contractors make more than that, let that sink in
Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
No one mentioning it’s all women?
Maybe repealing the 19th amendment, which trump supports, isn’t the worst idea.
Women here are trouble.
Maybe repealing the 19th amendment, which trump supports, isn’t the worst idea.
Women here are trouble.
Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
Can someone point to one benefit the 19th amendment gave us? One positive thing?
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
Not bad. But 200k puts you at the 96th percentile. Not filthy rich - but way better than most.
black dog
Free America
Slave Labor gets sh!t done.
Was at an auction in Elwood yesterday and I bought an 1903A3 that looks like it was just brought out of a crate and test fired 6 times.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Far too emotional to have a vote in anything important.
3 Reasons Why Women Should Not Vote
Spending
I posted this chart previously, and let’s now take a closer look at what its saying.
Government spending exploded at exactly the moment women’s suffrage occurred. Are the two things related? Many researchers say no, and posit a number of other explanations for why spending took off at precisely the moment women gained the right to vote (but not the obligation to die). An incredibly popular theory, still in use today, is Baumol’s model of unbalanced growth. Baumol theorizes that wage increases will always outstrip productivity, driving up the cost of any particular service. Productivity is always playing catch up to wage increases. Another theory is that interest groups and entrepreneurial politicians became more involved in pressuring governments to spend more (at the behest of whom, one wonders), and still others argued that society was just coming to understand that government services were a superior good.
All of these lovely ideas fall apart though, when one considers that government hasn’t always been growing and in fact, per capita government spending actually fell after WWI. You can see from the graph that government spending declined for four years in a row, before women were granted universal suffrage. 1920 happens, and wham! It takes women four years to vote spending up to the previous peak, and only 11 years to double per capita spending. What did women spend that money on? Two major initiatives supported by women: alimony laws that applied only to women, and could be enforced for the duration of a woman’s life, and Prohibition.
It’s almost funny, isn’t it? Give women power, and they take away men’s money, and their beer.
It’s like a bad sitcom. It’s also historical fact. That is what women did. And it’s what they will continue to do. In 2016, we are facing a Presidential candidate who is seriously advocating that college tuition should be ‘free’. And who are most college students? That’s right: women. They’re not populating STEM subjects (unless they involve taking care of babies or animals). They’re enrolled mostly in bullshit liberal arts degrees that provide them with no viable market skills, other than to work for the government, consuming even more resources.
Recall that women cannot be drafted. They do not think in terms of military sacrifice, because they will never vote for themselves to be sacrificed. When the money starts to run out, which department do you think women will vote to begin stripping resources from? Which department do they have the least stake in? The least ability to understand?
They will strip money from the Department of Defense.
Women will consume government resources until the state collapses. As long as women can vote, they will consume, whilst not producing those resources.
Women should not vote, because they will eventually cannibalize the military, leaving us all at the mercy of our enemies.
I remember Spoon saying that even Queen Victoria did not support women's suffrage.
Nice score! Lovely rifles..
I wonder why.
Crockett....excuse me, Crockrtt, rushed to make some money off her ghetto diatribe and couldn't even spell her own name right:
www.foxnews.com
Way to pick 'em, Dallas.
Rep. Crockett ripped for hawking T-shirt based on feud with MTG: ‘Start by spelling your last name correctly’
Social media users criticized Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, after she promoted merch off of her feud with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., this week that had her named apparently misspelled.
www.foxnews.com
Way to pick 'em, Dallas.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Not unless the average pay went up about 40% in the last 4 years. I used to review the labor statistics regularly to help build justifications for going over the trip wires and while the base often paid about $200k for a senior engineer (Level 3), that was a fully burdened rate so the person themselves would be lucky to be clearing $130k.
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Grossly overpaid plus the side deals they make.