My solution to the "Bridge" dilemma!

W

Wenchy

Guest
Dougstermd said:
Scaredy cat pansy's do not need to be drivin

I'm scared of meeting someone head on who might think that it's okay to drink and drive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
KAHUNA said:
I've tried that! Works great, except for the part where the panic attack ensues. :coffee:
If you're not mentally competant, perhaps you shouldn't be controlling a 2 & 1/2 ton block of steel travelling at a mile a minute.
 

KAHUNA

New Member
Dougstermd said:
if its lower it has to be a draw bridge. What part of Maritime commerce do you not understand???


That's crap, and you know it! It would have to be a lot lower before that would happen. And by the way, when's the last time you saw a freighter coming up the Patuxent (considering it narrows to a creek in Anne Arundel County! :coffee:
 

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
KAHUNA said:
That's crap, and you know it! It would have to be a lot lower before that would happen. And by the way, when's the last time you saw a freighter coming up the Patuxent (considering it narrows to a creek in Anne Arundel County! :coffee:
There is a Navy base with a dock just upriver from the bridge
 

Dougstermd

ORGASM DONOR
KAHUNA said:
That's crap, and you know it! It would have to be a lot lower before that would happen. And by the way, when's the last time you saw a freighter coming up the Patuxent (considering it narrows to a creek in Anne Arundel County! :coffee:

Ever see a Sailboat go up the Patuxent River, A Pile driving crane,a barge of rip rap (or other aggregate) maybe a barge carring the mechanisms that need to be replaced on the draw bridge???

Bridges are not and should not be designed to interfere with Maritime traffic

there are other considerations such as storm surge and currents at the mouth of the river.
 

KAHUNA

New Member
Dougstermd said:
Ever see a Sailboat go up the Patuxent River, A Pile driving crane,a barge of rip rap (or other aggregate) maybe a barge carring the mechanisms that need to be replaced on the draw bridge???

Bridges are not and should not be designed to interfere with Maritime traffic

there are other considerations such as storm surge and currents at the mouth of the river.

Right...that's why the bridge was closed for almost two years shortly after opening due to cracking in the foundation. The entire series of support piers are now wrapped in steel to keep the whole thing from coming down! That really inspires my confidence. Hauling barges don't need that kind of height to get under, nor do sailboats. There's simply too many other bridges in this region that allow for most kinds of maritime traffic without being THAT high. That's all I'm saying. :coffee:
 

Dougstermd

ORGASM DONOR
KAHUNA said:
Right...that's why the bridge was closed for almost two years shortly after opening due to cracking in the foundation. The entire series of support piers are now wrapped in steel to keep the whole thing from coming down! That really inspires my confidence. Hauling barges don't need that kind of height to get under, nor do sailboats. There's simply too many other bridges in this region that allow for most kinds of maritime traffic without being THAT high. That's all I'm saying. :coffee:


can you give me an example of a bridge that is as low as what you would enjoy crossing that does not impede maritime traffic
 

FireBrand

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
KAHUNA said:
Right...that's why the bridge was closed for almost two years shortly after opening due to cracking in the foundation. The entire series of support piers are now wrapped in steel to keep the whole thing from coming down! That really inspires my confidence. Hauling barges don't need that kind of height to get under, nor do sailboats. There's simply too many other bridges in this region that allow for most kinds of maritime traffic without being THAT high. That's all I'm saying. :coffee:

It was closed 12 or more years after opening and only for 3 or 4 months, not two years !

Some piers wrapped, not all of them !
Jeesh, who told you that story ?
 

KAHUNA

New Member
Dougstermd said:
can you give me an example of a bridge that is as low as what you would enjoy crossing that does not impede maritime traffic


Well, let's see...the South River Bridge in Annapolis, the bridge crossing over the Rappahanock at Port Royal, Virginia, the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge, just to name a few. Actually, I might be able to handle the Thomas Johnson Bridge a bit better if they'd constructed higher Jersey walls, or extended the fencing a little further up. :coffee:
 

FireBrand

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
KAHUNA said:
Well, let's see...the South River Bridge in Annapolis, the bridge crossing over the Rappahanock at Port Royal, Virginia, the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge, just to name a few. Actually, I might be able to handle the Thomas Johnson Bridge a bit better if they'd constructed higher Jersey walls, or extended the fencing a little further up. :coffee:

You seem to be a nice person KAHUNA, but you have no kahunas.
Seems that all logic has failed, next stop.....therapy....
 

BS Gal

Voted Nicest in 08
FireBrand said:
You seem to be a nice person KAHUNA, but you have no kahunas.
Seems that all logic has failed, next stop.....therapy....
Xanax works well for bridge crossings.
 

Dougstermd

ORGASM DONOR
KAHUNA said:
Well, let's see...the South River Bridge in Annapolis, the bridge crossing over the Rappahanock at Port Royal, Virginia, the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge, just to name a few. Actually, I might be able to handle the Thomas Johnson Bridge a bit better if they'd constructed higher Jersey walls, or extended the fencing a little further up. :coffee:


are you serious the Rapphanock at port Royal since the water depth there at mean high tide is about two feet:shrug:

The WW is a draw bridge

I have not argument for the south river
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
KAHUNA said:
STOP BUILDING THE BRIDGES SO BLASTED HIGH!!!
I just scrolled through and did not see anyone mention this, so... even if the state agreed with you this would only affect bridges built henceforth.

What is your solution for the bridges already there (Johnson and Nice)? Tear them down and rebuild them?
 

Dougstermd

ORGASM DONOR
aps45819 said:
Did you know that's the only draw bridge on any interstate highway


Not so grasshopper.

There is a draw span on I 64 crossin the Elizabeth river in Chesapeake Va.

it is actually a highrise with a considerable cleareance maybe 100 feet. i have only been caught by it maybe three times pretty impressive.
 
S

somdebay

Guest
KAHUNA said:
I was reading the op-ed section in the Southern Maryland Extra insert to this Sunday's Post. I've got a solution to the problem of "jumpers", failing architecture, and the general fear many have of crossing both the Thomas Johnson Bridge in St. Mary's County, and the Harry Nice Bridge in Charles County. STOP BUILDING THE BRIDGES SO BLASTED HIGH!!! We don't have warships coming up the Potomac anymore into DC, and I don't particularly care about having my view of Solomon's island be "asthetically pleasing"! I just want to get over the darn thing without fearing for my life. Funny, but the flat bridge from Benedict (in Charles County) over to Calvert County has worked just fine for years now. Not to mention the extra cost and maintenance of these stratospheric leviathans. Lower the bridge a little, and a lot of your problems would go away (as well as my sweaty palms)!

just put up fences like they have on other parts of the bridge...cheap and easy
 
Top