Nuclear weapons documents sought at Mar A Lago

PJay

Well-Known Member
Nuclear MAGA 👍

d5b3b0dfda55798a.jpg
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
So far, all I am seeing is - rumor. No one is coming out and saying it, and when we do see the warrant data - who in the press is going to completely forget it was all about nuclear codes?

My BS meter is pegged on this one. And it's usually right. This sounds like a hasty lie - and a bad one.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
My BS meter is pegged on this one. And it's usually right. This sounds like a hasty lie - and a bad one.


Accusations ALWAYS turn out to be fantasy and lies from the left.

Time and time again, accusations against Trump, Russiagate, collusion, Two Scoops, over feeding fish, very fine people
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Private money to a private citizen for use of his private golf course?
Sounds alot like what this Country was built upon...Free trade & Capitalism

How do you keep missing the obvious?


While at the same claim Hunter took money from foreign governments. When did Hunter work for the government? Hypocrite
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Another Huge Red Flag in the Trump Raid Story


Well, Mr. Attorney General, if they’re so professional and full of integrity, can you explain why the Wall Street Journal apparently knows the contents of all the classified documents and supposedly “top secret” documents removed from Trump’s home and has apparently reviewed some of them?

“FBI agents who searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home Monday removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal,” the outlet reported. “The Federal Bureau of Investigation agents took around 20 boxes of items, binders of photos, a handwritten note and the executive grant of clemency for Mr. Trump’s ally Roger Stone, a list of items removed from the property shows. Also included in the list was information about the ‘President of France,’ according to the three-page list. The list is contained in a seven-page document that also includes the warrant to search the premises which was granted by a federal magistrate judge in Florida.”

Gee, if these documents were so incredibly sensitive and secret that the FBI had to conduct an armed raid of Trump’s home in order to retrieve them, how come the press is allowed to know the nature of the documents? These documents are apparently too sensitive for Trump to possess but not so sensitive that FBI agents can’t show them off to the media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member

Another Huge Red Flag in the Trump Raid Story


Well, Mr. Attorney General, if they’re so professional and full of integrity, can you explain why the Wall Street Journal apparently knows the contents of all the classified documents and supposedly “top secret” documents removed from Trump’s home and has apparently reviewed some of them?

“FBI agents who searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home Monday removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal,” the outlet reported. “The Federal Bureau of Investigation agents took around 20 boxes of items, binders of photos, a handwritten note and the executive grant of clemency for Mr. Trump’s ally Roger Stone, a list of items removed from the property shows. Also included in the list was information about the ‘President of France,’ according to the three-page list. The list is contained in a seven-page document that also includes the warrant to search the premises which was granted by a federal magistrate judge in Florida.”

Gee, if these documents were so incredibly sensitive and secret that the FBI had to conduct an armed raid of Trump’s home in order to retrieve them, how come the press is allowed to know the nature of the documents? These documents are apparently too sensitive for Trump to possess but not so sensitive that FBI agents can’t show them off to the media.

Oh gee. Guess they got 'em.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
While the idea Trump is hiding knowledge of aliens at area 51 is completely logical to you guys
Actually I never mentioned aliens, but your incredible lack of reading comprehension baffles me.
What I wrote was:

And my only answer is - what's the biggest lie you could tell that would scare the most people into thinking the raid was justifiable? Terrorism? Bioweapons? Who killed Kennedy? What's at Area 51?

The obvious point being, if you want to scare the public and hope to incriminate someone, you cook up the most scary scenario possible. Like terrorism. Child sex trafficking. Fentanyl smuggling. Bioweapons.

So what do they say? Ummm. Ummmm. Oh - oh. NUCLEAR stuff. He kept nuclear stuff. Oh the launch codes? No, silly, those would be useless once he left office. Just nuclear stuff. Military plans? Weapons development? Heck no. He wouldn't have that. Just say nuclear.

Like the Jussie Smollett story - it just sounds ridiculous. If they find something incriminating hidden in Melania's drawers, you know it's fake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Actually I never mentioned aliens, but your incredible lack of reading comprehension baffles me.
What I wrote was:

And my only answer is - what's the biggest lie you could tell that would scare the most people into thinking the raid was justifiable? Terrorism? Bioweapons? Who killed Kennedy? What's at Area 51?

The obvious point being, if you want to scare the public and hope to incriminate someone, you cook up the most scary scenario possible. Like terrorism. Child sex trafficking. Fentanyl smuggling. Bioweapons.

So what do they say? Ummm. Ummmm. Oh - oh. NUCLEAR stuff. He kept nuclear stuff. Oh the launch codes? No, silly, those would be useless once he left office. Just nuclear stuff. Military plans? Weapons development? Heck no. He wouldn't have that. Just say nuclear.

Like the Jussie Smollett story - it just sounds ridiculous. If they find something incriminating hidden in Melania's drawers, you know it's fake.


Yes and what is area 51 notoriously known for?

"Alien Activity"

The reason people are focusing on the nuclear documents is because his lies don't work there.

A president can't declassify nuclear documents.Including nuclear weapons info and nuclear power plant plans.

So did the FBI plant this stuff? or did Trump just take it home to work from home despite not being president for 16 months, or did he wave a wand and declassify it?

Which lie would appease you?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The reason people are focusing on the nuclear documents is because his lies don't work there.

A president can't declassify nuclear documents.Including nuclear weapons info and nuclear power plant plans.


Liar ...... NO Mention of Nuclear ANYWHERE but the WashCompost Story


Yes and what is area 51 notoriously known for?

"Alien Activity"


Nice doge .... that is one hell of a stretch

you spewed some nonsense and got called out
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
A president can't declassify nuclear documents.Including nuclear weapons info and nuclear power plant plans.



Trump did what every single President in living memory always does, retained a few important documents relating to his presidency.

But that’s not all. Even if you can allege that Trump deliberately took highly classified documents, he still had every right to do it under the law. As President, Trump had unilateral power to declassify anything he wanted. While over the years the Legislature has tried to limit WHAT presidents can declassify and has tried to say HOW they have to do it, the Constitution doesn’t give the Legislative Branch those powers over the Executive.

The issue isn’t even new. In Deptartment of the Navy v. Egan (1987), the Supreme Court recognized the President alone has the constitutional power as commander-in-chief to classify and declassify:

The President, after all, is the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.” U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security and to determine whether an individual is sufficiently trustworthy to occupy a position in the Executive Branch that will give that person access to such information flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant… The authority to protect such information falls on the President as head of the Executive Branch and as Commander in Chief.​



Over the next few paragraphs, the Supreme Court explained that agencies like the NIA and CIA get their powers to classify or declassify documents FROM THE PRESIDENT. It’s not the other way around. The President holds those powers and delegates them to the agency heads. The agency heads don’t control the President’s classification powers.

As an important example of this Presidential power, Obama’s 2009 Executive Order No. 13526 declared a stringent declassification process for all federal officials and agencies, but it explicitly exempted two officials from the procedures: the sitting president and the vice president.


 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP
Top