Obama Comments and Hyperbole

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Obama Blames Trump For China’s Rise




Way off in the Land Down Under, former President Barack Obama blamed his White House successor Donald Trump for China’s increasingly antagonistic behavior.

Obama talked foreign policy during a paid speaking tour appearance Tuesday in Sydney — part of a lucrative arrangement that reportedly could net him upwards of $1 million.

In talking with former Australian Foreign Affairs Minister Julie Bishop, Obama said Chinese leader Xi Jinping has a “forceful and confident” demeanor, according to reporting by Daily Mail Australia and NCA Newswire.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Obama peaked when he was a community organizer signing up people to vote in Chicago. He wouldn't know leadership if it took it's 'magic wand' and brought back manufacturing jobs to the US and dropped them on his doorstep in Martha's Vineyard.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I didn't know there were enough idiots in Australia to pay this C-sucker a $ Million dollars to listen to him tell his lies and inform them of how great he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

spr1975wshs

Mostly settled in...
Ad Free Experience
Patron
Obama peaked when he was a community organizer signing up people to vote in Chicago. He wouldn't know leadership if it took it's 'magic wand' and brought back manufacturing jobs to the US and dropped them on his doorstep in Martha's Vineyard.
Living in Illinois while he was Senator Do-Nothing in the state legislature, tried to warn folks about him.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member

Obama didn't get 4 mansions and millions of dollars just by being President and writing a book.
He has been involved in all of the Biden messes and is using Biden as his scapegoat, and Biden is too stupid to know it.
 
Last edited:

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Actually if Trump is guilty of anything with China, it's been his single handed harshness with them that has hurt Americans more than the Chinese.

No one can seriously claim that Obama or Biden has played hardball with China.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Actually if Trump is guilty of anything with China, it's been his single handed harshness with them that has hurt Americans more than the Chinese.

No one can seriously claim that Obama or Biden has played hardball with China.
His harshness kept down the Taiwan threats when Trump was President.
Now the Chinese are playing up to Russia when we were pretty friendly with Russia.
Now the Russians don't want our money.

Biden sure has been a great foreign policy President------------Not
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Out-of-Touch Obama in Massive Self-Awareness Fail



In an interview with Christiane Amanpour on CNN, Obama said, “It’s very hard to sustain a democracy when you have such massive concentrations of wealth.” He went on to blather about “ladders of opportunity” and a “stronger safety net” before concluding that “if we don’t take care of that, that’s also going to fuel the kind of mostly far-right populism, but it can also potentially come from the left, that is undermining democracy because it makes people angry and resentful and scared.”

First off, with all due respect to the Condescender-in-Chief — which is none as far as I’m concerned — we’re a republic, not a democracy. Second, it’s an awfully Marxist argument to pin the problem and solution solely on economics.

But what I want to focus on is Obama’s utter lack of self-awareness. After all, if anybody should know about “massive concentrations of wealth,” it’s Barry. As Jim Geraghty points out at National Review:

Obama and his wife signed the largest book deal in history, $65 million, for their memoirs. The Obamas signed a separate production deal with Netflix worth an estimated $50 million. The Obamas’ production company, Higher Ground, signed a $25 million deal with Spotify that lasted three years. Barack Obama reportedly makes as much as $400,000 per speech, but reportedly made almost $600,000 for speaking at a conference in Colombia. Michelle Obama makes $200,000 per appearance.
The Obamas rent a mansion in Kalorama (a neighborhood in Washington, D.C.); bought a mansion and estate in Martha’s Vineyard, Mass.; bought another house in Rancho Mirage, Calif.; and still have their old home in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago.
In April 2010, then-president Obama declared, “At a certain point, you’ve made enough money.” Apparently, Obama hasn’t reached that point yet.

Ouch. Barack might need some ointment for that burn.

The other area where Obama is showing a painful lack of self-awareness is in his estimation of the roots of populism on the right. Naturally, as someone who sat at the feet of socialists for much of his formative years, Obama defaults to the economic reasons, with big government and the redistribution of wealth (someone else’s, not his own) as the solution, but what he either ignores or doesn’t realize is that one of the main catalysts for right-leaning populism is people’s belief that their government is against them. And we have Barack Obama to thank for laying that foundation.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Michelle Obama Takes Time From Opulent Greek Isles Vacation to Tweet About Muh Oppression












Michelle starts off strong by enunciating one of the many evils inherent to the practice of affirmative action:

Back in college, I was one of the few Black students on my campus, and I was proud of getting into such a respected school. I knew I’d worked hard for it. But still, I sometimes wondered if people thought I got there because of affirmative action. It was a shadow that students like me couldn’t shake, whether those doubts came from the outside or inside our own minds.

That right there is reason enough to outlaw the pernicious practice. It’s now impossible to see a black woman in a prominent position without suspecting that she does not merit it. This is destructive to her authority as well as her own self-confidence. And it harms the people affected by her decisions if, in fact, she is not the best person for the job.

Does Michelle imagine that her family would ever have seen the inside of the White House if they were white? That a first-term senator — with zero executive experience and enough serious ties to known communists and domestic terrorists to make him unlikely to get basic security clearance — was an attractive candidate otherwise?

(As an aside, if I ever need a serious operation, I will choose an Asian or white male doctor because I know he must be an absolute wizard if he was able to get into medical school.)

Mrs. Obama goes on to decry the advantage kids with rich parents have, to which we utter a collective, “No sh*t, Sherlock.” By the way, how did Sasha and Malia enjoy their one-percenter vacation, Michelle?

“Today is a reminder that we’ve got to do the work not just to enact policies that reflect our values of equity and fairness, but to truly make those values real in all of our schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods,” intones the island girl. Perhaps she should blaze an equity trail by selling one of the high-end properties in her family’s portfolio and sponsoring some promising scholars whose skin color she judges worthy.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Obama sold the Presidency and got rich doing it.
No way could Joe Biden have gotten away with selling the Vice Presidency without Obama's knowledge and consent, and perhaps his cut.
History may find out, but with the Justice Department we have now the truth will not be known.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Obama Condemns ‘Profoundly Misguided’ Book Bans in Letter to Nation’s Librarians



Much of the concern has focused on the book Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, an LGBT book that has been introduced to elementary and middle-school students around the country. The book, which received the 2020 American Library Association’s Alex Award, includes erotic scenes of men having sex, illustrations of minors performing oral sex, and a drawing of a man masturbating a young boy’s penis.

School districts from Alaska to Florida pulled the book off the shelf following community pushback. Meanwhile, Kobabe insists the book is suitable for younger audiences. “It’s very hard to hear people say ‘This book is not appropriate to young people’…There are people for whom this is vital and for whom this could maybe even be lifesaving,” the author told NBC News.

Similarly, in Minnesota, parents have challenged the inclusion of When Aidan Became A Brother, which explores a young girl’s decision to transition to a boy. “When Aidan was born, everyone thought he was a girl. When Aidan told his parents he felt like more of a boy, they were responsive and fixed things in his life so they fit him better,” a summary of the book reads.

In late June, Maryland’s largest school district began limiting public access to Board of Education meetings due to a growing uproar against the state’s “inappropriate” gender and sexuality curriculum.

“This is an attempt to stigmatize protests and it’s an attempt to stigmatize the families who are coming and showing up to show their support for restoring the opt-out option for parents,” Ismail Royer, a policy adviser for the parents’ group Coalition of Virtue, said. “It’s completely unnecessary for security. It’s just a way of demonizing defense.”

Beneath the former president’s letter to the nation’s “dedicated and hardworking librarians,” was a link to an organization, Unite Against Book Bans, spearheaded by the American Library Association. On Friday, the group held a rally in Chicago headlined by antiracist author, Ibram X. Kendi, who has infamously argued that the “only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Barack Obama Defends Children’s LGBTQ Books as States Prohibit Them from Schools







Obama’s letter comes as GOP-led states have prohibited books promoting gender ideology sexual orientation and restricted teachers from instructing grade-school children on those topics.

In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) was at the center of controversy when he signed the Parental Rights in Education Law, which prohibits school employees or third parties from providing instruction on the aforementioned topics.

“Exposing the ‘book ban’ hoax is important, because it reveals that some are attempting to use our schools for indoctrination,” DeSantis said in March. “In Florida, pornographic and inappropriate materials that have been snuck into our classrooms and libraries to sexualize our students violate our state education standards.”

DeSantis’s office revealed that, of the 175 books removed from schools across Florida, 87 percent contained pornographic, violent, or inappropriate content for their grade level.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) in May signed a similar law that was modeled after Florida’s law.

As the Des Moines Register reported:

The law will ban school books with descriptions or depictions of sex acts; prohibit instruction on gender identity or sexual orientation before seventh grade; require schools to notify parents if a student requests to use new pronouns; and enshrine the “constitutionally protected right” for parents to make decisions for their children.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
In late June, Maryland’s largest school district began limiting public access to Board of Education meetings due to a growing uproar against the state’s “inappropriate” gender and sexuality curriculum.
Yeah, they're going to find out - pissing off MUSLIMS isn't going to go anywhere.

Did you read the rest of the article? Publishers are now CHANGING THE WORDS of books like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, R.L. Stine's books and Fleming's Live and Let Die.

Changing - the - words. What does this SOUND like?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Did you read the rest of the article? Publishers are now CHANGING THE WORDS of books like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, R.L. Stine's books and Fleming's Live and Let Die.


I have posted repeatedly about this in the past year, multiple books / authors are being re-written

Old original Dungeons and Dragons content comes with ' warnings ' about potential triggers ....


1689675533707.png




Now a days, Orcs, Goblins, Kobolds and other ' evil ' races are well now racist in how they were portrayed - and also ' stand in's for Blacks somehow

oh and no ' race ' or monster is inherently evil now either
 
Last edited:

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I have posted repeatedly about this in the past year, multiple books / authors are being re-written

Old original Dungeons and Dragons content comes with ' warnings ' about potential triggers ....


View attachment 171597



Now a days, Orcs, Goblins, Kobolds and other ' evil ' races are well now racist in how they were portrayed - and also ' stand in's for Blacks somehow

oh and no ' race ' or monster is inherently evil now either
You're kidding - orcs and trolls are "racist". How do they get connected to blacks?
In Tolkien, orcs and trolls were made to mock the races of Elves and Dwarves.

You know the old saw that says if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail?
When the only thing you have is racism, everything out there is racist.

I swear someone out there is going to tell me that coffee is racist because it's black, and the cream in it is racist because it's white.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
You're kidding - orcs and trolls are "racist". How do they get connected to blacks?
In Tolkien, orcs and trolls were made to mock the races of Elves and Dwarves.



Wizards of the Coast is addressing racist stereotypes in Dungeons & Dragons



Among these races are the orcs, who are often characterized as a savage horde of creatures who lust for battle, and the drow, an evil dark-skinned subrace of elves who dwell in a subterranean matriarchy. Wizards of the Coast specifically addressed these two groups in laying out recent and future changes to D&D products:

We present orcs and drow in a new light in two of our most recent books, Eberron: Rising from the Last War and Explorer’s Guide to Wildemount. In those books, orcs and drow are just as morally and culturally complex as other peoples. We will continue that approach in future books, portraying all the peoples of D&D in relatable ways and making it clear that they are as free as humans to decide who they are and what they do. [...]
Later this year, we will release a product (not yet announced) that offers a way for a player to customize their character’s origin, including the option to change the ability score increases that come from being an elf, a dwarf, or one of D&D’s many other playable folk. This option emphasizes that each person in the game is an individual with capabilities all their own.

Wizards of the Coast also said it’s adjusting material that maligns or stereotypes real-world ethnic groups like the Roma. The company has revised the adventure Curse of Strahd, which includes a people known as the Vistani that “echoes some stereotypes associated with the Romani people in the real world.” In addition, the publisher said two future books will be written with a Romani consultant so as to characterize the Vistani “in a way that doesn’t rely on reductive tropes.”

Curse of Strahd was one of two adventures, the other being Tomb of Annihilation, in which the company changed “racially insensitive” text in recent reprintings. “We will continue this process, reviewing each book as it comes up for a reprint and fixing such errors where they are present,” said Wizards of the Coast.

Wizards of the Coast concluded by stating that it will work with a variety of “sensitivity readers” on future content and continue relying on “experts in various fields to help us identify our blind spots.” The publisher added that it is “seeking new, diverse talent to join our staff and our pool of freelance writers and artists.”



D&D Must Grapple With the Racism in Fantasy



“ORCS ARE HUMAN beings who can be slaughtered without conscience or apology.” This damning assessment of one of fantasy’s most ubiquitous villains comes from N. K. Jemisin, titan of modern fantasy and slayer of outdated genre tropes. As “kinda-sorta-people,” she writes, orcs are “fruit of the poison vine that is human fear of ‘the Other.’” The only way to respond to their existence is to control them or remove them.

What is an orc? To their creator, J. R. R. Tolkien, they are “squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow-skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes: in fact degraded and repulsive versions of the (to Europeans) least lovely Mongol-types.” More than half a century after Tolkien wrote that description in a letter, here is how Dungeons & Dragons describes the orc in the latest Monster Manual, where all such demi-humans are relegated: “Orcs are savage raiders and pillagers with stooped postures, low foreheads, and piggish faces.” Half-orcs, which are half-human and therefore playable according to Player’s Handbook rules, are “not evil by nature, but evil does work within them.” Some venture into the human-dominated world to “prove their worth” among “other more civilized races.”

Genetic determinism is a fantasy tradition. Dwarves are miners and forgers. Half-orcs are rampageous. Elves have otherworldly grace and enjoy poetry. Dark elves, known as Drow, have skin that “resembles charcoal” and are associated with the evil spider queen Lolth. As both a ruleset and a fantasy backdrop, D&D is in the business of translating these racial differences into numerical scores: Dwarves get extra points when they try to hit something with a battleaxe. Elves get plus two dexterity. Half-orcs’ “savage attack” lets players reap extra damage off a critical hit. All because of their race.


















A 2016 passage from a Dungeons & Dragons rulesbook has fans once again talking about a longstanding problem with how orcs are depicted in the tabletop game and other pieces of fantasy lore. Earlier today, the term "Orc" started trending on Twitter in the United States, as D&D and fantasy fans debated the issues surrounding the classic fantasy creature. The conversation started when Quinn Welsh-Wilson criticized a passage found in Volo's Guide to Monsters that noted that orcs could only develop a "limited capacity for empathy, love, and compassion." Welsh-Wilson prefaced their post with a "casual racism" trigger warning, which set off a heated debate over how orcs (and other fantasy races) are depicted in modern fantasy tales. This weekend's discourse surrounding orcs isn't exactly a new conversation, but it's one that's always worth discussing. There are two distinctive problematic elements to orcs: one that dates back to their origins in J. R. R. Tolkien's work, and one that reflects the wider issues surrounding race and ancestral origins in Dungeons & Dragons and similar fantasy games.

While orcs have their roots in goblins and other fairy tale creatures, the modern concept of orcs in tabletop games largely originates from Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. As depicted in Lord of the Rings, orcs are inherently evil humanoid creatures, and Tolkien described them in a letter as "degraded and repulsive versions of the (to Europeans) least-lovely Mongol types." Coupled with the fact that Tolkien depicted entire cultures as being representative of good or evil, many viewed orcs as a reflection of the "Other," a philosophical concept used to paint entire cultures as being somehow inferior or evil because they were different.


Now, Tolkien noted in other letters that orcs were not meant to be representative of a particular culture of people, and that "orcs" could be found on both sides of any conflict along with genuinely good people. However, his depiction of orc culture as a monolithic society of evil, human-like creatures became a standard element in epic fantasy. Over time, various artists and authors used elements of various real-world non-European cultures when depicting orcs in books and other media, thus solidifying the idea that orcs were a reflection of non-European races, which is incredibly problematic.

While the above couple of paragraphs only summarizes why many people take issue with the depiction of orcs in general, it also touches on why many dislike how Dungeons & Dragons and other fantasy tabletop games deal with race in general. Dungeons & Dragons and many other fantasy games tend to describe races as monolithic entities that all share the same physical characteristics and cultural beliefs. This is reflected both in the racial attribute scores bonuses that each race gets in D&D as well as how they are described in passages like the one criticized by Welsh-Wilson. Many people see games like Dungeons & Dragons as codifying and normalizing the use of racial stereotypes, which leads to both racist situations in the gaming table and encourages racist attitudes getting adopted by some players. For instance, a player using the orc race found in Volo's Guide to Monsters means that they take a -1 penalty to their Intelligence score, which means that the smartest Level 1 orc will always be less intelligent than the smartest Level 1 human. When translated to real-world discussions about races and cultures, it can be easily argued that this pushes an incredibly racist and outdated viewpoint.
 
Top