Otter
Nothing to see here
RPM said:they dont play for the ravens.
You can tell you're a big fan of both..
RPM said:they dont play for the ravens.
rraley said:Patrick Ramsey cannot move to save his life; that is the reason for the sacks. His legs seem to be weighted down by cement or something. I am damn glad that Brunell will be starting this season.
RPM said:they dont play for the ravens.
itsbob said:Yeah the Ravens were smart enough to sign Kordell Stewrat.. IDIOTS..
itsbob said:Yeah the Ravens were smart enough to sign Kordell Stewrat.. IDIOTS..
dems4me said:I play in a football "survey" so I was wondering if you can tell me B'more's pre-season record or of any injuries or anything offhand -- TIA
mizzle said:
dems4me said:Thanks It doesn't appear that they had any challenging teams to play against during preseason -- I think against a team like Detroit they would have been able to score more than 17 points. Thanks if there's any chance in me winning on this "survey" it generally happens early on in the season before teams establish winning records, because then it usually comes down to monday night points and you have around 50 people that all have the same teams as you. I'll hop over to the Vegas Odds webcite I like. Thanks again!
mizzle said:I personally dont think the preseason really matters, considering the short amount of time the starters actually play, historically it is hard to argue. Here are the superbowl winners preseason records.
1994, the 49ers went 3 – 1.
1995, the Cowboys went 2 – 3.
1996, the Packers 3 – 1.
1997, the Broncos went 3 – 2.
1998, the Broncos went 3 – 1.
1999 the Rams went 2 – 2.
2000 the Ravens went 4 – 0.
2001 the Patriots went 3 – 1.
2002 the Buccaneers went 3 – 1.
2003 the Patriots went 4 – 0.
itsbob said:Yeah the Ravens were smart enough to sign Kordell Stewrat.. IDIOTS..
kom526 said:Brunell is playing like a rookie qb, locking on to one receiver, throwing into double coverage. Maybe there IS a reason he was riding the pine last year. We can't lay it all on the qb though, the O line needs to step it up a bit, and for cripes sake, if the ball hits your hands you should catch it! (I bet Rod Gardner doesn't read these forums.)
Give me a break. Ramsey doesn't have a clue yet on how to read a defense as has been proven by his constant audible calls of last year that had everyone confused, even his own team, resulting in what I would say is close to the all time record for QB sacks. Good looks (which I certainly don't see in any manner) do not make a QB.dems4me said:I think its a moral problem at this point... why shoudl the O line step it up if time and time again, it's an incomplete pass, an interception or the QB can't seem to throw it higher than the defenders :shrug: That's why if Patrick Ramsey come's in - he'd be the spark for that offense as I've been saying all along... Patrick
dems4me said:I prefer to see Patrick Ramsey -- he took a lickn' last year with 30 sacks -- The term became "Saving Patrick Ramsey"
I think he should at least start the first game and see how he does. I think its a loyalty thing. :shrug:
Nope, but I do love your avatar.dems4me said:*BUMP* Was just wondering if all the Brunell backers have switched camps and now would like to see Ramsey :shrug:
Ken King said:Nope, but I do love your avatar.