Pence drops out

[StmarysCity79]

If the election was not conducted according to law, how can the results, that appoint those electors, be valid?

No, I have shown that changes made to the process were not as directed by the Constitution. It is only you that are conflating the issues, I am only speaking of one issue.

They were done according to the law. The law doesnt not mandate that expanding access to voting requires a new law be made. Nor does the addition of drop boxes or additional mailing voting. These things all already existed under current law.


And all of these non issues were addressed in the link I posted.

You have failed to post a single link backing any of your claims. All you continue to do is spout your opinion in different wording over and over.

 

[Ken King]

They were done according to the law. The law doesnt not mandate that expanding access to voting requires a new law be made. Nor does the addition of drop boxes or additional mailing voting

How does dropping the requirement for voter signatures, used to validate those ballots, expand voting access or help with voting security and integrity?

 

[StmarysCity79]

How does dropping the requirement for voter signatures, used to validate those ballots, expand voting access or help with voting security and integrity?

Is that your new argument now that you've been proven wrong about the electors and the the legislation.

Keep moving those goal posts.

Again.

Where is the proof to back up any of the crap you are spewing?

Scalise’s claim draws on a legal doctrine based on a strict reading of Article 2 of the Constitution. But it ignores the fact that courts have shut the door on challenges based on his argument, made in dozens of lawsuits by Donald Trump and his allies seeking to invalidate certified election results. It also ignores that some election officials have powers to set rules without legislative changes, especially during emergencies.

Scalise’s flawed argument that states ignored their own laws

Nearly one year after Joe Biden won the presidential election, some Republicans still stand by the falsehood that the el

www.politifact.com

 

[Ken King]

Is that your new argument now that you've been proven wrong about the electors and the the legislation.

Keep moving those goal posts.

Again.

Where is the proof to back up any of the crap you are spewing?

You haven't proved anything I have posted as being wrong. I'm still on the same field and the goal posts are still in the same location. Do you deny that Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, and the Wisconsin Elections Commission (“WEC”) and other local officials did?

 

[StmarysCity79]

You haven't proved anything I have posted as being wrong. I'm still on the same field and the goal posts are still in the same location. Do you deny that Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, and the Wisconsin Elections Commission (“WEC”) and other local officials did?

You failed to put a subject in that sentence.

Try again.

 

[Ken King]

You failed to put a subject in that sentence.

Try again.

The subject is the same one I have been talking about throughout, voting process changes that were not authorized by the legislature.

And based on this you can't deny that the changes were authorized, thus you FAIL.

 

[StmarysCity79]

The subject is the same one I have been talking about throughout, voting process changes that were not authorized by the legislature.

And based on this you can't deny that the changes were authorized, thus you FAIL.

Please reread the sentence. All you did was name a bunch of people and their positions. You did'nt even bother with the accusation since you and I both know there is nothing unconstitutional about their actions.

If there were why would you be the only one screaming about it?

Where are the legal challenges?

 

[gemma_rae]

You failed to put a subject in that sentence.

Try again.

Please reread the sentence. All you did was name a bunch of people and their positions. You did'nt even bother with the accusation since you and I both know there is nothing unconstitutional about their actions.

If there were why would you be the only one screaming about it?

Where are the legal challenges?

The subject is the posts/statements, i.e. (from Latin: id est 'that is') that Ken has made as opposed to ones the people he mentioned have made.

If you haven't enough of a command of the English language to understand that, why would Ken waste his time on an imbecile such as yourself, who cannot even communicate basic thoughts and ideas?

 

[stgislander]

I'm expecting a "go educate yourself" shortly.

 

[StmarysCity79]

I'm expecting a "go educate yourself" shortly.

Feel free. We have had to go back and forth and waste 2 hours all because Ken doesn't understand the difference between an administrative change and a legislative one.

The nonsensical argument he is trying to make is the same one that idiot Scalise tried for a while until he was laughed at too often.

Scalise’s flawed argument that states ignored their own laws

Nearly one year after Joe Biden won the presidential election, some Republicans still stand by the falsehood that the el

www.politifact.com

 

[gemma_rae]

Feel free.

The nonsensical argument he is trying to make is the same one that idiot Scalise tried for a while until he was laughed at too often.

You don't deserve laughter. In fact, the only thing you deserve is ridicule for the level of ignorance you display, and ostracization in the hopes that isolating you, and your mental deficiencies, may offer a measure of protection for others against the encephalitic parasite you are.

 

[jrt_ms1995]

I'm expecting a "go educate yourself" shortly.

It must be extremely intelligent to constantly be so obtuse.

 

[Grumpy]

The subject is the same one I have been talking about throughout, voting process changes that were not authorized by the legislature.

And based on this you can't deny that the changes were authorized, thus you FAIL.

 

[vraiblonde]

So a blind person can't vote?

What about someone who has a physical disability that prevents them from using their arms?

God you people come up with the dumbest reasoning.

Seems you shouldnt. be voting if you cant conceive of a blind person needing help to vote.

Some day you'll learn to read. Clearly that day was not today. Tomorrow's not looking promising either.

 

[GURPS]

Some day you'll learn to read. Clearly that day was not today. Tomorrow's not looking promising either.

Reading Comprehension

 

[vraiblonde]

Reading Comprehension

Or reading at all instead of just listening to the voices in her head.

 

[PrchJrkr]

Ever read Article II, Section 1, paragraph 2 of the Constitution - "Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector."

My take is that should electors be appointed using a process that was not directed by the legislature then such electors would not be valid. Do you see it any other way?

I read the act and now you should read that act too (it should only take you like a month or two and then your understanding of what it says will still be wrong), now clearly it has provisions for "proof of identification", now show me where it authorizes anyone (other than those that craft the law) to change that process.

Of course not, Ken. She gets her "facts" from a left wing website written by left wing lemmings such as herself. I'm afraid you're fighting a losing battle with that scurrilous halfwit. She probably goes to sleep at night muttering, "Orange man bad, orange man bad", while our country declines further and further into the socialist utopia that the lazy left craves so badly. That one has swallowed so much of the leftist Kool Aid, there's no hope a rational reasoned thought will ever change its disease riddled mind.

 

[StmarysCity79]

Of course not, Ken. She gets her "facts" from a left wing website written by left wing lemmings such as herself. I'm afraid you're fighting a losing battle with that scurrilous halfwit. She probably goes to sleep at night muttering, "Orange man bad, orange man bad", while our country declines further and further into the socialist utopia that the lazy left craves so badly. That one has swallowed so much of the leftist Kool Aid, there's no hope a rational reasoned thought will ever change its disease riddled mind.

Didnt you cash your pandemic relief check? Did you cry about socialism while doing it?

Can you even explain what a socialist utopia is and how exactly its taking over our country? In your own words?

 

[somdwatch]

I wonder if all you people saying Pence was disloyal to Trump by not going along with his attempt to steal the election think Kamala should get to decide who the next president is.

Kamala is a lot like you! (deranged) Would you trust her judgement?

 

[StmarysCity79]

Kamala is a lot like you! (deranged) Would you trust her judgement?

Good one! a fifth grader could come up with a better response.

Did you, an adult, actually waste your time typing that? Thinking it was clever?