Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Especially the armed 87,000 IRS people.Far more than we need..or should have.
Especially the armed 87,000 IRS people.Far more than we need..or should have.
Hope it's long enoughIt will great to see the "mayor" riding his bike out of DC... wondering if the bike will be seatless or not.
Lot of those sandcrabs can easily go to private contractors under contract. Do grass cutters and painters really need to be fed employed?Your link says there was 3.44M government workers in 1944 when the US population was 139m people, so 2.5% of the population were federal employees.
Today there are 2.95M government workers and a population of 346M people, so 0.8% of the population are federal employees. That's less than a third of what we had after WWII, and less than half of what we have had for the overwhelming majority of the existence of this country.
I would honestly challenge you to find a current dod civilian that is either of those things. Most of the services have been almost entirely contract for more than 20 years.Lot of those sandcrabs can easily go to private contractors under contract. Do grass cutters and painters really need to be fed employed?
So did the same people we're talking about. They should have known better than to FAFO.That same dude locked up people and held them without trial.
Yep. So many positions are contract. Supply guy in our building. Virtually all of your admin support staff as well. Your guards in the front of the building as well. The company I work for supplies a lot of admin support folks. But also high end financial support and program management too. IT support. And oddballs like me who dont fit into other categories.I would honestly challenge you to find a current dod civilian that is either of those things. Most of the services have been almost entirely contract for more than 20 years.
That's why those studies that say the average civil service person makes well above the average salary, because the overwhelming majority of government employees are in financial services, lawyers, PMs, engineers, scientists. Very few janitors and fast-food workers.
Could be,I retired in 91 and crabs were in fact cutting grass. tremendous waste of money. Glad it's resolved.I would honestly challenge you to find a current dod civilian that is either of those things. Most of the services have been almost entirely contract for more than 20 years.
That's why those studies that say the average civil service person makes well above the average salary, because the overwhelming majority of government employees are in financial services, lawyers, PMs, engineers, scientists. Very few janitors and fast-food workers.
The ones here are contractorsLot of those sandcrabs can easily go to private contractors under contract. Do grass cutters and painters really need to be fed employed?
Huh? Where did you see that? The majority of Government workers (Civil Servants) make LESS than their contract equivalents. This is why the Gov has such a hard time keeping talent. Too tempting to go to the contract realm and make around 30% more.That's why those studies that say the average civil service person makes well above the average salary...
Apparently that doesn't apply in DC because there are a number of Feds that are making six figures that aren't competent to work for Mickey-Ds.Huh? Where did you see that? The majority of Government workers (Civil Servants) make LESS than their contract equivalents. This is why the Gov has such a hard time keeping talent. Too tempting to go to the contract realm and make around 30% more.
No sheet sherlock. Keep up with the class, I said the studies that compare the AVERAGE government salary to the AVERAGE wage. Which is skewed precisely because the government does not directly employ all types of work in ratios matching the general public.Huh? Where did you see that? The majority of Government workers (Civil Servants) make LESS than their contract equivalents. This is why the Gov has such a hard time keeping talent. Too tempting to go to the contract realm and make around 30% more.
I wonder who the lucky SOB living in West Virginia getting payed DC locality is.Apparently that doesn't apply in DC because there are a number of Feds that are making six figures that aren't competent to work for Mickey-Ds.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/DCB.pdf
Maybe lead with that next time instead of what I quoted. It helps to make you point without TRYING to sound like you are the "smartiest person alive."No sheet sherlock. Keep up with the class, I said the studies that compare the AVERAGE government salary to the AVERAGE wage. Which is skewed precisely because the government does not directly employ all types of work in ratios matching the general public.
These are the "studies" used to argue that government employees are overpaid, coincidentally the only studies used by Congress when discussing pay and retirement.
Other studies (from GAO and from the AFGE) which show direct total compensation comparisons tend to show white collar government workers being underpaid compared to industry, while blue collar government employees tend to get paid better than industry (primarily due to benefits).
I remember articles that demonstrate - when comparing fairly - federal workers make less. For example your typical lawyer starting out makes more than the federal equivalent. Mostly true across the board for professionals.No sheet sherlock. Keep up with the class, I said the studies that compare the AVERAGE government salary to the AVERAGE wage. Which is skewed precisely because the government does not directly employ all types of work in ratios matching the general public.
These are the "studies" used to argue that government employees are overpaid, coincidentally the only studies used by Congress when discussing pay and retirement.
Other studies (from GAO and from the AFGE) which show direct total compensation comparisons tend to show white collar government workers being underpaid compared to industry, while blue collar government employees tend to get paid better than industry (primarily due to benefits).
I remember articles that demonstrate - when comparing fairly - federal workers make less. For example your typical lawyer starting out makes more than the federal equivalent. Mostly true across the board for professionals.
To which Rush would always - mistakenly - claim “then why don’t they all LEAVE “? And I wish I could have told him -
1. Federal benefits and retirement rewards longevity. The longer you remain the better they will be.
2. Generally, federal employ is far more flexible than private industry. You can adjust your entire schedule quite easily to accommodate thing going on in your life.
3. Benefits are excellent. You have the widest selection of anything I’ve ever seen.
4. By and large - you have job security. Private companies may go out of business or need to downsize. Not happening with the federal government.
And so on. Lots of reasons to stay ESPECIALLY if you’ve been there a long time.
Trying...and ALWAYS failingMaybe lead with that next time instead of what I quoted. It helps to make you point without TRYING to sound like you are the "smartiest person alive."
Sure there is. I don’t know how you might quantify job security.So, there are benefits that do have value, even if that's not reflected in studies.
Word on the street is that there were MANY violators of the locality pay rules during COVID. People who were collecting DC-area pay and "working remotely" from other areas of the country. Lazy supervisors who didn't do the relocation paperwork and employees with no integrity who didn't report it.Apparently that doesn't apply in DC because there are a number of Feds that are making six figures that aren't competent to work for Mickey-Ds.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2024/DCB.pdf
If they are paid 1/2 as much it is still too much, I have never seen such entitled, lazy, incompetent and worthless individuals as a government employee. That's why I got out and went into business.Huh? Where did you see that? The majority of Government workers (Civil Servants) make LESS than their contract equivalents. This is why the Gov has such a hard time keeping talent. Too tempting to go to the contract realm and make around 30% more.
I am friends or acquaintance with quite a few. I can say that after many, many conversations with high and low level Gov workers, many of them do NOT start this way. They are slowly turned into "lazy and worthless" workers after years or grinding with little to no recognition or reward.If they are paid 1/2 as much it is still too much, I have never seen such entitled, lazy, incompetent and worthless individuals as a government employee. That's why I got out and went into business.