PeoplesElbow
Well-Known Member
Isn't the annual leave accrual rate only 8 hours/pay period?
That is after you have 15 years, from 0-3 years its 4 hrs, and 3-15 its 6 hrs.
Isn't the annual leave accrual rate only 8 hours/pay period?
Sick and vacation. About a year. Hell, we're non union and on of my guys had 20 some weeks he never used. I paid him for it.
I have 6 months of sick leave on the books.
Me too, got close to 200 annual leave also.
I always wonder about the people that have worked for the government for 30 years and never seem to have any leave. I work with someone who takes the day off the instant he accrues the 9 hrs.
I think I have about 160 hrs. use or lose.
And I hit the 30 years in a few months.
Anyone bemoaning the 'great salaries' in public service at one point in their life had the option to sign up for the test. You chose to go a different path, now don't bitch if you see someone who made a smarter decision. This guy obviously has 400 days of sick leave because he didn't have to use it.
If you make a 'use it or lose it' sick leave policy, you are going to see lots of 'Monday man-flu' in the fourth quarter. It's probably best not to allow accrual of more than 90 days. That way the employee can bridge to short term disability if that was ever necessary but you don't have a big liability upon separation.
I wont speak for the others, but to me it's the silly accrual thats out of line.
??
I save my leave, so I have it when needed.
Over a year of it?
I wont speak for the others, but to me it's the silly accrual thats out of line.
Allowing this kind of accrual is a way for the city to pay a bonus that will fall into a budget someone else will eventually have to pay. The problem I have with allowing such a long accrual is that it doesn't get paid out at the cost when it was incurred but rather years later when the salary has gone up. Sort of the negative time value of money. The later the guy retires, the more expensive the sick leave gets.
I wont speak for the others, but to me it's the silly accrual thats out of line.
Yes.
I will apply my hours towards my years of service when I retire.
I will use what I was offered when I was hired.
Government.
With the Federal Government you can not cash in your sick leave, but you can use it at accrued years of service.
Annual leave, maximum year carry over is 240 hrs. after that you have use or lose for the rest of the next year.
You can not apply your annual leave toward accrued years served. They pay out your current annual leave hours, at your current salary rate when you retire.
Did I explain that correctly?
And those seem like reasonable policies. But getting a half million dollar check seems a bit excessive.
I'm sorry, your earned payoff of 500,000 seems excessive to us, please take this watch and be on your way.
Yeah.....that's right. I had to look waaay back through old pay stubs to find that.After 15 years.
I'm sorry, your earned payoff of 500,000 seems excessive to us, please take this watch and be on your way.
Not advocating breaking a deal thats been made. Am advocating not making stupid deals like that in the future. Set reasonable accrual limits. Set caps on payouts or require that it be taken.
What's reasonable? Someone already pointed out all this is is 12 days per year over a 35 year career he did NOT use. What is wrong with that? He WAS at work, doing his job, earning promotions, ALL those years. Are you saying 12 less sick/vacation days per year? It makes no sense to NOT be able to keep IOU's for something you're entitled to yet did not use.
Not all benefits need to be unlimited. Caps and/or restrictions, just like most of the world. Feds cap leave, and restrict sick leave to use or apply to retirement calculations.