Politics of Covid 19 Vaccines

[Hijinx]

They were told that if MedStar had to fire them, they'd never work there again. If they resigned, they could be rehired.

So, she "voluntarily" resigned.


That probably also negates any back pay

You see right there is what I mean by Medstar treating their people like sht.
Forced to resign under threat.

Not a good employer. Not a good business as they refuse to build and equip a larger Emergency room at St. Mary's. They don't care about care, they care about money.

 

[my-thyme]

You see right there is what I mean by Medstar treating their people like sht.
Forced to resign under threat.

Not a good employer. Not a good business as they refuse to build and equip a larger Emergency room at St. Mary's. They don't care about care, they care about money.

But, they are the only game in town. At least if they are hiring good employees, we will be assured of good care.

 

[Hijinx]

But, they are the only game in town. At least if they are hiring good employees, we will be assured of good care.

Yes the caregivers who work there will do their best under trying circumstances and you will get good care. But you may also wait hours for it. They did improve the waiting room.

That should tell you something.

 

[GURPS]

Booster Huckster: Did Pfizer’s Bourla lie about his positive COVID test to move product?​

This weekend, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made a splash when he announced Saturday that he tested positive for COVID-19 for the second time in 40 days.



Now, suddenly, Bourla has become a maniacal testing hypochondriac, despite having no symptoms?


Many on Team Reality justifiably took to mocking the horse doctor (he is trained as a veterinarian), due to his claim that he had taken four injections and multiple rounds of Pfizer pills, and still continued to get the “disease” that his pharmaceuticals were supposed to prevent.

But it’s worth understanding that mRNA true believers are the true target audience of Bourla’s post, not those who are already aware that Pfizer is selling a junk product with harmful side effects and negative efficacy. To the mRNA loyalists, Bourla’s announcement attempts to show that natural immunity is insufficient to protect against COVID-19, leaving his pharmaceuticals as their only acceptable tool in a perpetual battle against a virus.

Readers of The Dossier are not the target audience for Pfizer’s snake oil sales drive.

The target audience is people like this guy:





Given his track record, it is more likely that Bourla did not test at all, let alone test positive. Remember, this is a man who was infamously hesitant to take his own company’s product.

https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1558980374977548293?s=20&t=cYTdHa1ccQ8MV_Zyo7gvXw

 

[Sneakers]

Booster Huckster: Did Pfizer’s Bourla lie about his positive COVID test to move product?​

This weekend, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made a splash when he announced Saturday that he tested positive for COVID-19 for the second time in 40 days.



Now, suddenly, Bourla has become a maniacal testing hypochondriac, despite having no symptoms?


Many on Team Reality justifiably took to mocking the horse doctor (he is trained as a veterinarian), due to his claim that he had taken four injections and multiple rounds of Pfizer pills, and still continued to get the “disease” that his pharmaceuticals were supposed to prevent.

But it’s worth understanding that mRNA true believers are the true target audience of Bourla’s post, not those who are already aware that Pfizer is selling a junk product with harmful side effects and negative efficacy. To the mRNA loyalists, Bourla’s announcement attempts to show that natural immunity is insufficient to protect against COVID-19, leaving his pharmaceuticals as their only acceptable tool in a perpetual battle against a virus.

Readers of The Dossier are not the target audience for Pfizer’s snake oil sales drive.

The target audience is people like this guy:





Given his track record, it is more likely that Bourla did not test at all, let alone test positive. Remember, this is a man who was infamously hesitant to take his own company’s product.

Wouldn't the CDC take Pfizer's recommendations for when and how the drug is administered, and not the other way around? After all, Pfizer created it and tested it, and should know more about it than anyone else.

 

[GURPS]

Asymptomatic transmission was a lie​

Asymptomatic spread is virtually non-existent, and if this does occur, it is less than 1%. It is very rare and we have and had very limited evidence (and questionable) of this happening at all. We have no documented proof, no documented evidence of this occurring in any appreciable manner. Spread of pathogen will occur more surely when the persons are ill/sick with symptoms, especially if the symptoms function to expel the pathogen into the surrounding air. Having no symptoms or very mild symptoms reduces risk of spread and with no symptoms, spread is basically removed. If you have and had no symptoms, you do not transmit.

This means that all of the asymptomatic testing was never ever needed. None of it was ever needed and we used the flawed PCR test with the near 95% false positives (cycle count threshold over 24 detects viral junk, dust, fragments, not COVID virus; CDC set the cycle count threshold at 40), to shut down society. You do not mass test asymptomatic persons, you only test ‘symptomatic’ persons with strong clinical suspicion.

This is the same for SARS-CoV-2 virus and a recent BMJ publication pretty much sums it up that asymptomatic are rarely the drivers as it was thought to be. This is basic immunology and should not have changed for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). I/we are being emphatic in saying there is and was no evidence of asymptomatic spread. We also recognize that one must be careful not to claim ‘zero’ as the evidence changes daily and rapidly and absence of documented evidence is also not a reason. It may just have not been studied yet or documented optimally. But we are confident enough based on the existing literature to also agree that ‘it is a dangerous assumption to believe that there is persuasive, scientific evidence of asymptomatic transmission’.

The basis for the societal lockdowns was that 40% to 50% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 could potentially spread it due to being asymptomatic. “But fears that the virus may be spread to a significant degree by asymptomatic carriers soon led government leaders to issue broad and lengthy stay-at-home orders and mask mandates out of concerns that anyone could be a silent spreader”. However, the evidence in support of common asymptomatic spread remains largely non-existent and we argue, was overstated and potentially was made with no basis.

 

[Louise]

Haven’t gotten the flu vaccine since 2004. Haven’t had the flu since. And, no haven’t gotten the Covid vaccine.

 

[Louise]

For your consideration ...

Way too funny, or not. There is a sign at the Giant Foods store that says, "Get your flu shot and a COVID vaccine here".

Isn't the flu shot supposed to be a vaccine? And on vaccine pamphlet labeling it specifically states, "by prescription only". So how can any 'ole pharmacy just be giving out shots or "vaccines" without knowing the medical status of the person getting them? Do pharmacies give free Adenovirus, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Measles, mumps, rubella, Meningococcal, Poliovirus, Tetanus-Diphtheria, Varicella, Anthrax, Haemophilus influenzae type B, Japanese encephalitis, Pneumococcal, Rabies, Smallpox, Typhoid fever, Yellow fever, or the bicillin shots to people as well?

I regret that I had my daughter get the HPV vaccine at 12. She now has MS. No history of that in my family. I was a gov follower. I used to be an idiot, but do have to say that I have no side effects from being vaxxed in the 50’s. I was born in 1955. Daughters children have never been vaxxed for anything. We will see how that goes.

 

[GURPS]

"COVID-19 vaccines in human BREAST milk"​

Then we get this bombshell on biodistribution of COVID-19 vaccine to mammary glands and likely to distant cells:

These data demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge the biodistribution of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to mammary cells and the potential ability of tissue EVs to package the vaccine mRNA that can be transported to distant cells.’
​

‘Little has been reported on lipid nanoparticle biodistribution and localization in human tissues after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. In rats, up to 3 days following intramuscular administration, low vaccine mRNA levels were detected in the heart, lung, testis, and brain tissues, indicating tissue biodistribution.4 We speculate that, following the vaccine administration, lipid nanoparticles containing the vaccine mRNA are carried to mammary glands via hematogenous and/or lymphatic routes.5,6 Furthermore, we speculate that vaccine mRNA released into mammary cell cytosol can be recruited into developing EVs that are later secreted in EBM.’

Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

This cohort study investigates the presence of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA in the expressed breast milk of lactating individuals who received the vaccination within 6 months after delivery.

jamanetwork.com

 

[GURPS]

A blockbuster new JAMA Pediatrics study found mRNA particles in breast milk — you know, exactly what they swore on a Bible would never, ever happen.






The good thing though is that at least no expecting mothers lost their jobs over the jabs or anything.

Oh, wait. Nevermind.

Anyway, don’t worry, the CDC still says the shots are totally safe for pregnant women:



Dr. Naomi Wolf says the Pfizer documents show that four women’s breast milk turned blue-green, which doesn’t sound too good, and one breastfeeding infant in the Pfizer clinical trials DIED.




But it’s okay! You can trust everything ELSE they told us about the safety and efficacy of the shots because … science! Shut up!

☕️ C&C NEWS ☙ Tuesday, September 27, 2022 ☙ RAMMING 🦠

Canada drops last travel mandates; CDC lied about mRNA; reality rams doc; Snowden gets citizenship; Biden Raid case updates; NASA rams asteroid; and much more...

www.coffeeandcovid.com

 

[GURPS]

Politicians and pharmaceutical companies promise that vaccinations protect against a severe course of corona. Current ICU data raise doubts​

This is how the distribution among vaccinated people looks like
​

3.2 percent of all intensive care patients (60 cases) had one vaccination, 12 percent two vaccinations (222 cases). At 55.6 percent, the largest group in the intensive care units (1029 cases) were those who had three vaccinations. According to the DIVI intensive care register, 15.5 percent of all patients (286 cases) were vaccinated four times or more. This emerges from the weekly report of the Robert Koch Institute from September 8th. Vaccination status was reported for 1,850 Covid-19 admissions - representing approximately 59.6% of the cases reported for this period (3104).

 

[GURPS]

New Data on the Omicron Booster Casts Doubt on Actual Efficacy​

Actual Efficacy Against Infection
​

But the data buried on page 32 of the supplemental appendix is the data set on efficacy regarding COVID infections.

Instead of neutralizing antibodies, this is real world information that is extremely relevant for how successful the new booster will be at stopping a fall and winter wave. While that seems ludicrous to anyone paying attention, there are many influential politicians and “experts” who are already making that case.

So what’s the data?

Well, buried down in the supplemental appendix we see that the new booster, labeled mRNA-1273.214, is just as unsuccessful at preventing infection or symptomatic illness as the previous boosters:



While these are obviously extremely small sample sizes, there were multiple COVID cases by CDC or COVE definition — and wouldn’t you know, zero amongst those with prior infection.

And this study purposefully excluded those who had prior infections within three months of the study start date.

It’s important to note that prior infection resulted in zero actual COVID cases, and only three asymptomatic infections.

However, of the 11 infections in the booster arm with no infection, 5 were symptomatic.

Again, these are extremely small sample sizes, but it’s already an indication that hoping to vaccinate our way out of seasonal surges is never going to work.

What should surprise no one is that the government decided to purchase 171 million doses based on data like this, and it turns out that they’re likely already behind on variants:






Incredibly, just one month ago, CDC Director Walensky made the same absurdist claim as Fauci that mice data was sufficient because it allowed them to have a tailored vaccine for the current variant:

“There’s always a question here of being too slow versus too fast, and I think one of the challenges is if we wait for those data to emerge in human data, not just mice data, in human data, we will be using what I would consider to be a potentially outdated vaccine,” Walensky said. “I believe it is best to use a vaccine that is tailored for the variant that we have right now.”

The incompetence is as endless as it is profound.

 

[GURPS]

Genetically modified mosquitoes vaccinate a human



“We use the mosquitoes like they’re 1,000 small flying syringes,” said researcher Dr. Sean Murphy, as reported by NPR.

Three to five “vaccinations” took place over 30-day intervals.

The mosquitos gave minor versions of malaria that didn’t make people sick, but gave them antibodies. Efficacy from the antibodies lasted a few months.

“Half of the individuals in each vaccine group did not develop detectable P. falciparum infection, and a subset of these individuals was subjected to a second CHMI 6 months later and remained partially protected. These results support further development of genetically attenuated sporozoites as potential malaria vaccines,” researchers concluded.

Carolina Reid was one of twenty-six participants in the study.

“My whole forearm swelled and blistered. My family was laughing, asking like, ‘why are you subjecting yourself to this?'”

 

[GURPS]

National Guardsman with religious objection given COVID-19 vaccine instead of flu shot​

After refusing the COVID vaccine multiple times and requesting a religious exemption to the mandate, former Maine National Guard Specialist Mathew Bouchard was given the mRNA shot instead of the flu vaccine months before he was to leave the service, he told Just the News on Thursday.

Bouchard, who served in the military for six years, said he first filled out a COVID vaccine refusal form in April 2021, then again in November when he was ordered to get the flu shot, despite the fact that he was leaving the military two months later.

When he went to get the flu vaccine, Bouchard filled out the refusal form for the COVID vaccine and then completed a form for the flu shot.

 

[herb749]

National Guardsman with religious objection given COVID-19 vaccine instead of flu shot​

After refusing the COVID vaccine multiple times and requesting a religious exemption to the mandate, former Maine National Guard Specialist Mathew Bouchard was given the mRNA shot instead of the flu vaccine months before he was to leave the service, he told Just the News on Thursday.

Bouchard, who served in the military for six years, said he first filled out a COVID vaccine refusal form in April 2021, then again in November when he was ordered to get the flu shot, despite the fact that he was leaving the military two months later.

When he went to get the flu vaccine, Bouchard filled out the refusal form for the COVID vaccine and then completed a form for the flu shot.

Oops ...... we gave you the wrong shot. But hey, you can stay now .

 

[OccamsRazor]

National Guardsman with religious objection given COVID-19 vaccine instead of flu shot​

After refusing the COVID vaccine multiple times and requesting a religious exemption to the mandate, former Maine National Guard Specialist Mathew Bouchard was given the mRNA shot instead of the flu vaccine months before he was to leave the service, he told Just the News on Thursday.

Bouchard, who served in the military for six years, said he first filled out a COVID vaccine refusal form in April 2021, then again in November when he was ordered to get the flu shot, despite the fact that he was leaving the military two months later.

When he went to get the flu vaccine, Bouchard filled out the refusal form for the COVID vaccine and then completed a form for the flu shot.

So he had a religious reason to NOT get the COVID vaccine BUT... flu shot is A-OK?

 

[Gilligan]

So he had a religious reason to NOT get the COVID vaccine BUT... flu shot is A-OK?

I wouldn't want all that experimental COVID vaccine crap injected in me either. Especially since its been proven to be almost totally ineffective.

 

[Loper]

now do all the nurses that were fired....

I'm waiting for this to happen for the Gov Contractors, I know, don't hold my breath.

 

[LightRoasted]

For your consideration ...

So he had a religious reason to NOT get the COVID vaccine BUT... flu shot is A-OK?

Ahhh yeah. It's called free will. For others, it's called granting, or withholding, consent.

 

[Hijinx]

A person should not have to lie about religion to refuse a shot that doesn't work and may cause more damage than the Covid. That is pretty much what this boils down to. People being forced to lie to avoid what they feel is a dangerous experimental medicine.