The EVIL side of "Going Green"
The EVIL side of "Going Green"
Found the leftist.You know, I always follow Chickanic for all my international trade news and opinion.
A couple notes.
#1) they didn't ban lithium sales, they wrote a law asking for bribes and already exempted China. Guess who they sold almost all of their lithium to already. China. Guess who provides us most of our lithium batteries, China.
#2) they provide like 2% of the worlds lithium. The overwhelming majority comes from, drum roll, Australia.
#3) The price of lithium literally doesn't matter. As she said, the price has gone up 10 thousand percent in the last few years, and yet lithium batteries have dropped in price significantly over that same period. Weird, right? Not really, the amount of lithium in most common lithium batteries is vanishingly small, and getting smaller every day.
#4) America does have lithium mines, we don't use them because it's generally not profitable. If the prices go up, it will be profitable (just like fracking........). Then once we ramp up production price would plummet (just like fracking.....)
You would be better off being concerned about cobalt.
Bottom line, people have been predicting lithium battery costs increases for years (decades) even on this very forum. Usually from the same couple of posters. Guess how often they have been correct. A big fat zero.
So nanny nanny booboo, stick your head in doodoo,
You know, I always follow Chickanic for all my international trade news and opinion.
A couple notes.
#1) they didn't ban lithium sales, they wrote a law asking for bribes and already exempted China. Guess who they sold almost all of their lithium to already. China. Guess who provides us most of our lithium batteries, China.
#2) they provide like 2% of the worlds lithium. The overwhelming majority comes from, drum roll, Australia.
#3) The price of lithium literally doesn't matter. As she said, the price has gone up 10 thousand percent in the last few years, and yet lithium batteries have dropped in price significantly over that same period. Weird, right? Not really, the amount of lithium in most common lithium batteries is vanishingly small, and getting smaller every day.
#4) America does have lithium mines, we don't use them because it's generally not profitable. If the prices go up, it will be profitable (just like fracking........). Then once we ramp up production price would plummet (just like fracking.....)
You would be better off being concerned about cobalt.
Bottom line, people have been predicting lithium battery costs increases for years (decades) even on this very forum. Usually from the same couple of posters. Guess how often they have been correct. A big fat zero.
So nanny nanny booboo, stick your head in doodoo,
For your consideration ...
Electric car batteries made using fossil fuels. Tires made using crude oil. Plastics made from crude oil. Body made from mined metals using fossil fuels. Battery's charged up from electricity made in a power plant fueled by mined coal/oil/natural gas. All this =EV-BS.
6 of one, half a dozen of another. A zero sum game where the people are the losers.
Is this really so? I don't care enough to research it myself, I just find that pretty amazing. I know that I'll most likely never buy another vehicle so either way it won't affect me unless petroleum products are outlawed. I'm slowly converting my fishing fleet to use more electric than gasoline.So, regarding the batteries charged with electricity generated by fossil fuels. The thing there is that all power plants are much more fuel efficient than any vehicle engine. Even accounting for transmission losses, the fuel burned in a plant allows more miles travelled than that same amount of fuel burned in a car engine.
Even not accounting for scale, the fact that base load generating plants operate at a fixed rpm for max efficiency makes it so. Your car engine, even at it's most efficiency RPM, doesn't turn fuel into motion as efficiently as that huge generator.Is this really so? I don't care enough to research it myself, I just find that pretty amazing. I know that I'll most likely never buy another vehicle so either way it won't affect me unless petroleum products are outlawed. I'm slowly converting my fishing fleet to use more electric than gasoline.
I have no personal scientific basis for this, but from what I understand/have been told/read about, all coal powered plants now basically have almost zero waste/emissions. The stuff coming out of the 'new' chimneys is simply steam. Everything else is recovered and used. One of the larger byproducts is gypsum, which is what is in your drywall you bought at Lowe's last week.
I think it is really funny that folks plug in their electric 'green' cars that are still mostly charged by coal. My understanding is until SMECO ran that new 230kV line down Calvert and over to the Hewitt substation, 0% of SMECO's energy came from nuclear..last year it was something like 17% (that number is from memory but on SMECO's site), so I think they finally tapped in to Calvert Cliffs during that run...but most of that nuclear energy goes to Baltimore.
So, regarding the batteries charged with electricity generated by fossil fuels. The thing there is that all power plants are much more fuel efficient than any vehicle engine. Even accounting for transmission losses, the fuel burned in a plant allows more miles travelled than that same amount of fuel burned in a car engine.
For your consideration ...
There is always a loss of conversion efficiency somewhere within the system. The average coal-fired power plant in the United States operates near 33% efficiency. Which means there is a 66% energy loss. Now add in the efficiency lost during the transmission of electricity over power lines, through transformers, to an end user. Today's gasoline driven cars have engine efficiency of up to 35%. More energy efficiency is captured when residual energy is used to heat the car during winter. So again. 6 of one, half a dozen of another. A zero sum game.
"Up to" efficiency for cars against an average efficiency for coal. Nice try. Natural gas gets up in the 60% range with only 30% heat. And we use more natural gas than we do coal. And of course, the average efficiency of American vehicles is much lower given our penchant for big heavy vehicles that get low mpg. So use 20-30% for ICE.
Natural gas power plant - Energy Education
energyeducation.ca
So its not a zero sum game. Again, you do have line losses in transmission of electricity, but you also have transmission losses in ICE vehicles, between 12-20 percent depending on the vehicle.
For your consideration ...
You a funny man. You castigate me for saying "up to", and yet, on the link you supplied it states, "The thermal efficiency of the combined cycle can get up to 60%. Moreover, these plants produce one third of the waste heat of a plant with a 33% efficiency (like a typical nuclear power plant or an older coal power plant)."
So again. It is zero sum.
BTW, EV cars still have things that reduce overall efficiency, .... weight, gearing, cold weather, air resistance, mechanical resistance, tire inflation levels, etc..
Just a little story about this family in Abell.
The man says his house was set on fire by his cell phone while it was charging.
Well now he has no house.
One day one of these EV's is going to be parked in the garage of a row house and burn down the whole block of them. My advice if you have an electric car leave it outside.
Gasoline cars usually do not catch fire spontaneously . It usually comes from another problem, not the battery. Usually bad maintenance.You realize that gas cars catch fire in garages too, right?