no.justice
New Member
Has anyone had any issues with the way defense attorney, Robert Harvey, handled their case?
In my particular case which was a frivolous lawsuit I found him apathetic, but more than willing to take my money
You had him file a frivilous lawsuit and are upset because he showed no interest in something which was frivilous? Good for him for taking your money.
Hey dickweed, maybe the frivolous lawsuit was against bucketlady.
If he was the opposing lawyer, why would she be so upset that he had no interest in the case.
I would be upset if someone filed a frivolous lawsuit against me and my lawyer didn't seem to care about it. An aggressive lawyer would have filed a counter suit asking for fees and court costs, or perhaps advised BucketLady to file a restraint order against this person - something to make up for her time and money dealing with it, and to discourage the plaintiff from continuing their harassment.
I have a whole rant about this sort of thing if you want to hear it.
And don't mind, DoWhat - he's an ass.
And don't mind, DoWhat - he's an ass.
You need a reading comprehension class. He is a DEFENSE atty. She was not happy with his DEFENSE of her case.You had him file a frivilous lawsuit and are upset because he showed no interest in something which was frivilous? Good for him for taking your money.
You need a reading comprehension class. He is a DEFENSE atty. She was not happy with his DEFENSE of her case.
I would be upset if someone filed a frivolous lawsuit against me and my lawyer didn't seem to care about it. An aggressive lawyer would have filed a counter suit asking for fees and court costs, or perhaps advised BucketLady to file a restraint order against this person - something to make up for her time and money dealing with it, and to discourage the plaintiff from continuing their harassment.
I have a whole rant about this sort of thing if you want to hear it.
And don't mind, DoWhat - he's an ass.
Notice the likes on my post and draw your own conclusions.My reading comprehension is fine. Negative Ghostrider.
She stated he was A defense attorney. She didn't say he defended her in a case. She didn't say she filed a frivolous lawsuit as you posted. (there's that pesky reading comprehension subject again)
If you see it more clearly than I, Why yes, yes I do.
perhaps I'm wrong. Why yes, yes you are.
The person who brings the lawsuit is the plaintiff. His/her lawyer is the plaintiff's attorney. The other person is the defendant. His/her lawyer is the defense attorney. They can't both be defendants or there would be no lawsuit. And why would she call her own lawsuit frivolous?My reading comprehension is fine. She stated he was A defense attorney. She didn't say he defended her in a case. If you see it more clearly than I, perhaps I'm wrong. I will bet that the opposing attorney is also known as a defense attorney. So if Shane Mattingly is a defense attorney, and he is in a case against Brian Dugan, aren't they both defense attorneys?
Yes he is very eager to take your money but does very little to earn it. Anyone else?In my particular case which was a frivolous lawsuit I found him apathetic, but more than willing to take my money