Racing Queers

[Hessian]

I endured team Guido on the last Amazing race..just wish they were cone on the first leg.
I read how gays were "upset" that the team was too stereotypical and not a fair representation Oh? Skipping through Singapore and shopping for fragrances wasn't fair?

Well, now lets take it one step further...a "married": pair of queers.

After looking forward to this race since last Fall, I just couldn't watch it. CBS is still looking for ways to normalize the abnormal. I also refuse to purchase Kodak products for their open support of the gay agenda and firing of an employee who refused to take re-education courses regarding alternative lifestyles.

So...will someone post when the queers are off so I can try to enjoy a decent night of TV without having to expose that abnormality to my daughter?

PS...what is the next taboo that they will try to "normalize?" Cross dressers? Transgender? Pedophiles?

 

[vraiblonde]

If they take the gays off TV, then you'd get bored and have nothing to get spun up about.

Watch the Disney Channel or Nickelodeon - there's absolutely nothing offensive on either of those channels and the programs are very entertaining. I dare say, better than anything else that's out there.

 

[Surf City Baby]

Originally posted by Hessian
PS...what is the next taboo that they will try to "normalize?" Cross dressers? Transgender? Pedophiles?

How about a show about "normal" folk who just can't stop the erroneous comparison of gay people with pedophiles? Or about "normal" folk who think being gay is all about sex?

Give me a break.

 

[vraiblonde]

Re: Re: Racing Queers

Originally posted by Surf City Baby
Or about "normal" folk who think being gay is all about sex?

Uh, Surf? Being gay IS all about sex. It's the only thing that's different.

 

[RoseRed]

Re: Re: Re: Racing Queers

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Uh, Surf? Being gay IS all about sex. It's the only thing that's different.

tap...tap...tap...

 

[Hessian]

Illusions...

CBS is pandering all over the board....knowing that people will watch and root for a "normal" gay couple..
Knowing that people will watch hoping they act up and get giggly.
Knowing that people will watch and hope they lose (I won't give them that satisfaction)

To portray it as normal is a lie--all the studies out there refer to
*higher frequency of transmission of disease...

*more frequent partner swapping...

*horrendous emotional damage to families (guilt, shame, accusation)

And we are to glibly laugh along with Will and Grace or root for an "All American" pair of Boys...

When we should be showing disgust and shame for the decay they represent.

 

[Sharon]

Well Hessian...

Originally posted by Hessian

PS...what is the next taboo that they will try to "normalize?"

Tune in for this one.

 

[Hessian]

Paradox

Sharon...thanks for the reminder...I only briefly had read through that spread.

HERE is the Paradox.
If you ask a Gay if they chose this life style they adamantly say no and "Why would anyone Choose to be Gay?" They openly admit they are unhappy...BUT, what do we see a show promoter say?

"We really wanted to attract the straight population," Ross said. "By adding in this twist, we thought it would bring in a larger audience and would challenge the notions of all of our viewers — both gay and straight."

Thus trying to lure more to join their queer lifestyle under the thin guise of being "educational." Sorry, I don't buy it!

just like I don't buy the 2 gays on the race...its not entertainment,...its a promotional tour.
Gee, what would happen if they stopped in Riyad?...hmm I can picture one pair being "eliminated."

 

[vraiblonde]

Sorry to bust your stereotype, Hessian, but the gays I know aren't these angst-ridden, diseased, promiscuous types.

Of course TV is going to portray people as more "interesting" than what they really are. How many married couples do you know that are like any family you see on TV?

And while we're at it, Scott Peterson was a heterosexual. So was Andrea Yates. Serial killers tend to be heteros, as are most rapists. You'd be better served to focus your attention on these types instead of gay people who aren't bothering you, except in your own mind.

 

[Hessian]

Now Vrai...
I'm not going in that direction of psycho killers ...That could be another thread and I recall a man named Gacy who enjoyed his roll as painted clown a little too much but again, that is another thread.

Lets look at journalism by omission shall we?
When was the last time you saw a show on...
a) The long and guilt-stricken anguish of women who chose an abortion and now regret it the rest of their lives?
b) The life of a selfless missionary giving all they jave to a needy people over seas.
c) A Prison chaplain working for years meeting needs both behind bars and among families in need on the outside?
d) Gays that have turned their lives around and left the entire lifestyle behind?

THAT is reality television that will never see the light of day in the networks because they don't understand it...don't want to hear it... and have an agenda of their own that they can't compromise. Ie Bernard Golstein's expose of the the Left agenda in the media.

Amazing Race would be amazing if someone had morals, defied political correctness and told team daisy to quit their lifestyle and live a life that is upright in the sight of God and man....That would be amazing.

 

[Surf City Baby]

Re: Re: Re: Racing Queers

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Uh, Surf? Being gay IS all about sex. It's the only thing that's different.

No, sweetie. It is not all about sex.

Look at it this way, Vrai. The sex is no different. Gay people don't do anything in bed that straight people don't do. The only thing that's truly different is the partner's gender -- and why should that matter to anyone else? To say being gay is all about sex is exactly the same as saying being straight is all about sex.

 

[migtig]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Racing Queers

Originally posted by Surf City Baby
being straight is all about sex.

Ya mean it's not?!

 

[Surf City Baby]

Re: Illusions...

Originally posted by Hessian
To portray it as normal is a lie--all the studies out there refer to
*higher frequency of transmission of disease...
*more frequent partner swapping...
*horrendous emotional damage to families (guilt, shame, accusation)

Please cite these studies.

Hessian, I'm gay. That's probably been clear for a while, since it's clear I'm a woman and I refer to my mate or my beloved rather than to a husband.

I don't have any STD's. Even if I did, I wouldn't be spreading them because I am married, i.e., I am in a committed, monogamous relationship. And if I were not married and did have an STD, I still wouldn't be a vector of transmission because I would "play safe" if I were to have sex with anyone. (Moreover that activity would be no one's business but mine.)

My beloved and I aren't into "partner swapping." Monogamy and faithfulness mean exactly that.

Our family -- that is, the two of us; yes, we are a family, as is any married couple -- is whole, healthy, and happy.

My beloved's family knows she's gay, has always known she's gay, and has never had any problem with it. She grew up Southern Baptist, and her SB parents, who were wed in 1950, are still happily married. Her brothers, who in many ways are "typical" southern rednecks, are even cool with it -- with her and with me, and they know exactly who I am to her.

My family knows I'm gay. My father, who did not raise me, would agree with your opinions about homosexuality, but we communicate honestly with each other, and with love. My sisters embrace me, as do their husbands and their children. We grew up in a twisted household, and I guarantee you that my childhood chaos & abuse had nothing to do with my sexuality. How could it: I didn't realize I was gay until four years after I'd left "home."

I have known gay people who fit the stereotypes you cling to. I have also known straight people who fit those same stereotypes. I think a critical analysis would find that the problems of "the gay community" are equal in severity, variety, and proportion to those of "the straight community."

Hessian, I'm afraid your stereotypes are based on erroneous information. If you're convinced they are not, please do post links (or journal titles) to some of these studies. I'll be interested to read them.

 

[Surf City Baby]

Re: Paradox

Originally posted by Hessian
HERE is the Paradox.
If you ask a Gay if they chose this life style they adamantly say no and "Why would anyone Choose to be Gay?"

What is "this life style?" I'm baffled when people refer to "the gay lifestyle," as if it were any different from the average lifestyle lived by anyone else.

Originally posted by Hessian
They openly admit they are unhappy...

Who does? I'm happy. Every gay person I know is happy. Everyone has his days of angst, but that's not exclusive to gay folk.

But I agree: who indeed, with all the negative stereotypes about us, let alone the outright hatred and even desire for our deaths that we see exhibited, would choose to be gay?!

 

[vraiblonde]

First of all, Surf, the labels "straight" and "gay" refer to sex, period. What defines a gay or straight person? Who they have sex with. That's it, period, end of story, finito.

Second, TV isn't a good barometer of any culture. My grandmother thinks all blacks are ghetto rappers with gold chains and hos hanging around. She lives in a sleepy little Kansas town and the only black people she sees are the ones on MTV and the thugs that make the news.

It stands to reason that someone who doesn't know any gay people in real life would think that they're all Queer Nation freaks, flamers and bull-dykes, considering that's all the media shows.

 

[Surf City Baby]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
First of all, Surf, the labels "straight" and "gay" refer to sex, period. What defines a gay or straight person? Who they have sex with. That's it, period, end of story, finito.

Second, TV isn't a good barometer of any culture. My grandmother thinks all blacks are ghetto rappers with gold chains and hos hanging around. She lives in a sleepy little Kansas town and the only black people she sees are the ones on MTV and the thugs that make the news.

It stands to reason that someone who doesn't know any gay people in real life would think that they're all Queer Nation freaks, flamers and bull-dykes, considering that's all the media shows.

You make some excellent points.

I haven't been clear. In saying "it's not all about sex" I'm looking at a different angle: folks you describe in the third para of your post often imagine that all we gay people care about is sexual activity. Nothing could be further from reality.

 

[Hessian]

Stats anyone?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431

Please make a thorough reading and note how homosexuals attempt to discount the facts.

more research on the way.

 

[Hessian]

Next...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22921

Accepted beliefs in genetics and irreversibility considered.

 

[Hessian]

Our language...twisted

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18239

Long article but it very clearly points out how the gay agenda has intimidated, altered language, pushed a devianced to the forfront and then attempted to force us to accept it.

Thus we have the "normalization" on CBS


And just in case you couldn't find the courage to keep reading...

"STDs (sexually transmitted diseases) are higher among homosexuals than in any other subculture. Many diseases are endemic to that group. The diseases commonly found (40 percent or higher) among homosexuals include: gonorrhea, nonspecific urethritis, syphilis, hepatitis, amebic dysentery, salmonella, intestinal parasites, shigellosis, venereal warts, incurable genital herpes, and the Big Daddy -- AIDS, which has clearly been linked to homosexual behavior.

Incredibly, even with the evidence staring them in the face, the medical community -- and homosexual doctors in particular -- continue to employ doubletalk or to impart outright misinformation regarding the transmission of the AIDS virus. "We can't really say for certain that AIDS is transmitted sexually," said one homosexual physician. "It's just that it appears to be."

Care to follow that spin?

How about that healthy loving couple representing Americans around the world every Thursday night...

 

[vraiblonde]

I have to contest those "statistics", Hessian. Almost every woman I've ever known has had some form of molestation from an adult man.

Men molest children at a significantly higher rate than women do. So it stands to reason that boys would be molested by homosexual men in far greater numbers than girls are molested by lesbian women.

As far as the Advocate having all these nudie boy pics, I'll bet there's not a day goes by that I don't get some porn spam advertising "barely legal" girls, with pics of some kid in pigtails and a baby doll nightie, holding a lollypop and trying to pretend she's 13.

"Very few gays exhibit preference for older men."

And very few hetero men express preference for older women. When you have Bob Dole getting wood on a TV commercial for a then 19 year old Brittney Spears, something's wrong.

Sorry, Hessian - I'm not convinced.