Pete
Repete
Good grief Bob in 1995 we were in the "great drawdown period" Every branch of service increased their entry requirements because we didn't need as many. When you have the same size pool of applicants for a significantly smaller set of jobs ANYONE can be more picky. The Army got whacked harder than the rest. Hell we were paying people to get out with TERA and the other program that slips my mind.itsbob said:By 1995 the opposite was true.. NOBODY with less then a 50 AFQT could get in the Army PERIOD.. we sent all those guys to the Navy or the Marines.. We went two or three years with 100% IIIA, then they opened up limited IIIB.
And how many, in your years of recruiting, that scored over a 50 AFQT had line scores less then 100??
Every October we would get the USAREC "quota" for each test category, and were VERY limted on how many CAT-IV(if any), III-B and Non Grad III-A's that we could write nationally for the year, most years it was ZERO.. after that quota was gone (usually within two weeks) they shut us off, and were done until the next October.
Now what we did with all those others, to include those with less then gleaming criminal records, was send them to the Guard & Reserve (the Reserve recruiter DID work out of the Army office).. All of their standards were negotiable, and they could just about put anybody in that could inhale 3 times in a row without choking..
The Navy also used CAT-IV people for many years to fill really crappy hard to fill jobs. They even went back to 2 year, no guarentee jobs and it bit them in the ass.
As far as line scores go the forumla is on the Army website for each job. A 100 line score in CO does not mean that they will get the same in MM or ST because different chunks of ASVAB are used to compute it. One persons AFQT of 51 could be a ST of 115 and qual for a ST job yet another persons AFQT of 70 could be a ST of 90. It all depends on the score for a particular area.
The point remains that when you said an infantryman needed the same score as a linguist you were misleading. Not many people would say a person who scores a 90 in arithmetic, auto/shop and mechanical comprehension is as sharp as a person who scores a 95 in Word knowledge, reading comp, mathematic knowledge and mechanical comperhension.
In conclusion the ASVAB is by no means an all inclusive indicator anyway. I saw guys with a 61 who were aces and many with 90 who could not chew gum and walk who were only interested in when payday was.