That was an embarrassment for the league, a rip off for fans and players alike, and just a damn shame when players that good have to deal with refs that bad.
Two out right over turned calls, the Harrison TD was awful close, 3 piss poor personal foul calls on the Cards on the Steelers first drive of the second half, James Harrison faked the ref into a critical hold on the Cards next to last drive, an iffy call on the safety, a total non call on two men holding on the Holmes TD, the Holmes TD, from the down field angle, looks like his right foot is on top of his left, not on the turf meaning no TD and the last play, Warner's arm was clearly going forward which means, with the stupid helmet penalty, one more shot for the Cards from the Steelers 35.
The refs had a really tough time, I agree. I think the 1st TD overturned was a good call after the 20th time I looked at it. The first few times I saw it I coulda swore he got in and his knee didn't hit, but it did. I think the overturn was correct too, but I forget what the play was. The Harrison TD *was* awful close, which is why it wasn't overturned. When in doubt, the call stands. Great call by the official.
The personal foul calls were all correct. I'm sorry but just because it's the Super Bowl, the rules don't get changed. The only debatable one was a late hit on the QB, but that was correct because even though he was very close, he extended his arms and shoved after the ball had been released. That's the only time they call late hits that are so close. The safety was a bit lame, but also correct. I don't think you call a holding penalty that is meaningless to the play, ESPECIALLY when it results in a safety, but it was a hold.
On the Holmes TD...oh no, a non-call on a holding? Geez there is only holding in about 75% of the plays. After all the bickering you just did about all the excessive calls they made, you're going to ##### that they actually let them play? If that fantastic grab had been nullified by a holding call, you would have been up in arms on a "debatable" holding and everyone in America would have been freaking out about it. And from the downfield angle? You realize they had about 10 different views of his feet, right? Who cares if ONE view makes it look like maybe his one foot was on top of the other? He dragged his feet, don't you worry. But as I said before, something THAT close is never overturned. If you don't have a definitive 100% no doubt about it view that says the call is wrong, the call stands.
As for the last play, it was a tough call. They discussed it, a few refs said what they saw, and a call was made. It was very difficult to determine whether his arm was going forward. But then give the Cards the ball back and give them a 15 yard penalty from a BS call that wouldn't have resulted if it hadn't been a turnover? That's ludicrous. I think they were on the 44 so the ball would have been on the 29. If the Cardinals had won from that, or from the TD being overturned, fans would have been up in arms about the game being stolen from the Steelers.
The refs had a very tough game but I think for a bunch of the critical calls, they did a pretty good job. There may have been a few calls wrong here and there, but overall it wasn't bad at all.
I agree 500% THAT should have been reviewed. I was rooting for Pittsburgh but after the refs' bad calls, I started feeling bad for Arizona and rooting for them - at best THAT last pass/fumble SHOULD have been reviewed - at least review the crap.... that was just blatant and dumb. WTF????? At least review it, don't be so damn obvious
And here I was rooting for Pittsburgh even
It's reviewed in the booth. Evidently they felt they saw enough evidence there that it wasn't worthy of a review. To me, it looked like he didn't have control of the ball when he arm started moving forward. It may have been close enough for a review, but usually they won't have the ref review it if the people in the booth think it's not close enough to overturn. IMO it should have been reviewed by the ref as well, but it was another too close to call and I don't think it would have been overturned.