RFK, Jr.

[OccamsRazor]

You can tell everything about a person by who they choose to align themselves with. Democrat politicians can talktalk all they want, but at the end of the day they are a member of a political party filled with pedophiles, child sex traffickers, racists, and misogynists. Their besties are all in favor of chopping off the body parts of little kids and drugging them to turn them into something they aren't and will never be.

You say you vote for a person, but how do you know anything about that person? Because they say so? Or because you observe their behavior and who they align with?

Were there some good Nazis? Great folks who just happened to support feeding Jewish children into the ovens and doing horrific experiments on Jewish babies? Or is anyone who would support such a thing a bad person?

Here I thought it was just the Woke Democrats that called everyone who didn't agree with them 100% a Nazi

 

[Dakota]

He is a good guy. JMO.

I think so also but I feel like many, he is a Kennedy, comes from money and isn't one of us. But, like your parents, my mother was beyond devastated when JFK was killed, and she was an ultra-conservative. There is zero doubt in my mind, RFK, Jr. could very well be the front runner for the Dems.

Another one to watch, IMO, is Vivek Ramaswamy as a Republican. He is sharp as a tack and a good age, IMO. I am wondering what dirt will surface about him though.

 

[vraiblonde]

This right here....
And yet, when asked here and almost anyplace else, what do the Majority Identify as these days? Independents...
And who aren't Independents voting for?...Independents...why not?

I call myself "unaffiliated". And I don't vote for "independents" because, as Clem said, they are independents in name only. They almost ALWAYS vote with the Democrats. Just like liberals tarnished the word so badly they had to start calling themselves "progressives". And now that they've made that derogatory, what will they call themselves next?

 

[vraiblonde]

Here I thought it was just the Woke Democrats that called everyone who didn't agree with them 100% a Nazi

I call Nazis Nazis, regardless of what they call themselves. I disagree with you frequently - have I ever called you a Nazi?

 

[LightRoasted]

For your consideration...

Just a few years ago, the masses were screaming about female circumcisions. I wonder what their thoughts on that now.

I say bring it on. Women feel too much as it is.

 

[RoseRed]

For your consideration...



I say bring it on. Women feel too much as it is.

What does that even mean?

 

[LightRoasted]

For your consideration ...

What does that even mean?

That women use emotions more so when it comes to decision making and other factors rather than critical thinking. Hence they feel too much rather than think. Female circumcision may remedy that.

I know that goes against many a conventional thinking. Thought I'd throw it out there.

I mean hey, if boys get circumcised mostly for aesthetic reasons, and because women think it "looks" better, why not circumcision for women if it might help them think out things rather than use emotions to come to conclusions?

 

[vraiblonde]

For your consideration ...



That women use emotions more so when it comes to decision making and other factors rather than critical thinking. Hence they feel too much rather than think. Female circumcision may remedy that.

I know that goes against many a conventional thinking. Thought I'd throw it out there.

I mean hey, if boys get circumcised mostly for aesthetic reasons, and because women think it "looks" better, why not circumcision for women if it might help them think out things rather than use emotions to come to conclusions?

Welcome to America, Mustafa. Please enjoy your stay.

 

[Loper]

For your consideration ...



That women use emotions more so when it comes to decision making and other factors rather than critical thinking. Hence they feel too much rather than think. Female circumcision may remedy that.

I know that goes against many a conventional thinking. Thought I'd throw it out there.

I mean hey, if boys get circumcised mostly for aesthetic reasons, and because women think it "looks" better, why not circumcision for women if it might help them think out things rather than use emotions to come to conclusions?

That's a mighty broad brush you have there. Careful your Hemi is showing.

 

[Merlin99]

you don't belong to a party, but they do. And despite what you think you are not voting for an individual, you are voting for them and everyone they are beholden to. If you don't think they owe their party 100% for being elected, you're not paying attention.

Independents don't get elected president. Hell, they almost never get elected to congress (the fakes in VT still align with D's on every vote, they are independent in name only).

Using that logic it’s not worth voting at all. I may be deluding myself, but I like to believe that I’m a part of the American experience. Same way as I have blood when I was able. I couldn’t say I made a difference, but I like to think I did.

 

[Merlin99]

So you finally admit that the overwhelming majority of Democrats are in favor of pedophilia, child sex trafficking, drug trafficking, and genital mutilation. And the handful of Democrats who say they aren't in favor of it vote for it anyway, which is still evil.

I haven’t admitted anything. What I’ve posted was a survey that broke down R’s and D’s positions on gender change (mutilation). It doesn’t say a single word on pedophilia, sex trafficking or drug trafficking and you know it, it’s just another straw man.

Some things should be deal breakers for ALL Americans. Torturing children should be one of those things and it's pretty amazing that 2/3 of Democrats say it's okay, and the other third are willing to overlook it.

Nobody’s talking about torturing children, you’re diving deep into the hyperbole pool again. They’re talking about performing elective surgery on a willing patient. Personally I don’t think that someone that young should be making life altering decisions, but that’s the actual argument.

So no, I won't support those people. Not a single one of them. I am not in favor of sexually torturing children and there is nothing anyone can say that will make me change my mind. You can't shame me into your way of thinking, and in fact it's just the opposite - I look at you and am like, WTAF??? You can call me closed minded all you want and I'll still look at you like, WTAF???

I’m not trying to shame you into changing your POV, personally I’ve never seen you change your mind on anything but I can try to make you see POV.

 

[WingsOfGold]

Just a few years ago, the masses were screaming about female circumcisions. I wonder what their thoughts on that now.

As Asskissio said

 

[Louise]

For your consideration ...



That women use emotions more so when it comes to decision making and other factors rather than critical thinking. Hence they feel too much rather than think. Female circumcision may remedy that.

I know that goes against many a conventional thinking. Thought I'd throw it out there.

I mean hey, if boys get circumcised mostly for aesthetic reasons, and because women think it "looks" better, why not circumcision for women if it might help them think out things rather than use emotions to come to conclusions?

Really? You posted that. Circumcision was started in the 1850’s to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Men think they are so manly, but they wouldn’t make it through one menstrual cycle; much less carrying and having a baby.

 

[WingsOfGold]

Really? You posted that. Circumcision was started in the 1850’s to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Men think they are so manly, but they wouldn’t make it through one menstrual cycle; much less carrying and having a baby.

One is built for it, the other isn't.
That's like asking can a woman survive prostrate cancer. Then again in today's world the nuts would say yes.

 

[vraiblonde]

They’re talking about performing elective surgery on a willing patient.

"Oh, cutting off a toddler's penis and drugging him with hormones is just elective surgery on a willing patient!"

I can't even express how much you disgust me and now I'm putting you on ignore. Feel free to call me a bunch of names now that you've shown everyone exactly what you are.

I can try to make you see POV.

Pedophiles and child sex torturers don't have a POV, they have a sickness and an evil. That you think they do says everything about you.

 

[LightRoasted]

For your consideration ...

Really? You posted that. Circumcision was started in the 1850’s to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Men think they are so manly, but they wouldn’t make it through one menstrual cycle; much less carrying and having a baby.

Actually, Louise, circumcision has been around since about 2300 BC with historical records and archaeological evidence dating the practice back to the ancient Egyptians. And was religious in nature, not to prevent STD's. Both Jewish and Islamic law sanction and indeed promote religious circumcision for males. And if what you say is somehow true, which it is not, then how is it that those men in outer countries, such as Europe, and other uncircumcised men, have no issues concerning STDs? The practice of circumcision is rare in Europe, Latin America, and most of Asia and we don't hear of epidemic outbreaks of STDs there now do we?

 

[vraiblonde]

For your consideration ...



Actually, Louise, circumcision has been around since about 2300 BC with historical records and archaeological evidence dating the practice back to the ancient Egyptians. And was religious in nature, not to prevent STD's. Both Jewish and Islamic law sanction and indeed promote religious circumcision for males. And if what you say is somehow true, which it is not, then how is it that those men in outer countries, such as Europe, and other uncircumcised men, have no issues concerning STDs? The practice of circumcision is rare in Europe, Latin America, and most of Asia and we don't hear of epidemic outbreaks of STDs there now do we?

Normally I don't read her posts but I saw this one because you quoted it. I might have to start paying more attention just for the entertainment value.

 

[Hijinx]

I know I am going to get burned for this one.

If circumcision was good enough for Jesus it's good enough for me.

 

[WingsOfGold]

I know I am going to get burned for this one.

If circumcision was good enough for Jesus it's good enough for me.

I've been around the block a time or two and have had many women say they would never do humma humma on a ant eater. I was relieved.

 

[Merlin99]

"Oh, cutting off a toddler's penis and drugging him with hormones is just elective surgery on a willing patient!"

I can't even express how much you disgust me and now I'm putting you on ignore. Feel free to call me a bunch of names now that you've shown everyone exactly what you are.



Pedophiles and child sex torturers don't have a POV, they have a sickness and an evil. That you think they do says everything about you.

What toddler are you talking about? I’m going to take you up on the name calling, you’re a psycho. You’re making up circumstances to make your case and they’re just not there. Nobody’s talking about doing a dickectomy on a kid not even able to form a sentence.

A pedophile is someone attracted to a prepubescent child, no one except for you has said the word boo about that. And child sex torturer? Where did you pull that out of, I’m guessing it’s straight out of your ass because you’re the only one using that in an argument.

So feel free to put me on ignore, I’m going to take your having to make up stories as a win. I’m also going to have to lower my opinion of you quite a lot.