Richard Fritz: 1964 - Year of the Gang Rape

Clem_Shady

Clem_Shady

New Member
Good morning Fritz haters!

Unite!

Grab your "Vote out the Rapist" signs.

Take to the streets of Leonardtown.

Tell em Clem Shady sent you!

:yahoo:
 
JOKER

JOKER

Great Mills Rd

Attachments

  • FritzPic.jpg
    FritzPic.jpg
    120.1 KB · Views: 101
JOKER

JOKER

Great Mills Rd
I was looking for John Mattingly in the phone book

Does he even have an office anywhere?

Oh thats right he got evicted from his
last office for not paying the rent to
Walter Dorsey's widow.

So I guess that's why she got that lien against him.
 
megahurts

megahurts

New Member
JOKER said:
I was looking for John Mattingly in the phone book

Does he even have an office anywhere?

Oh thats right he got evicted from his
last office for not paying the rent to
Walter Dorsey's widow.

So I guess that's why she got that lien against him.
Click to expand...

yes its amazing how devastating the wrath of a corrupt states attorney can be on an innocent man. It doesn't matter if you are guilty, they can still destroy you.

As you point out, Fritz cost Mattingly his law practice and more than $300,000. It doesn't matter that Mattingly was found 100% innocent or that Fritz FABRICATED all of the evidence against mattingly.

oh well, I hope the next guy who thinks he can run against FRITZ in a free democratic election learns from john's mistakes.
 
JOKER

JOKER

Great Mills Rd
Yes we know John made lot's of mistakes...
but why is it always someone else's fault
Never John's.....

Did you ever think that maybe John caused
most of all of his own problems.

When you have a sleaze bag for a Real Estate Partner
and try to screw every person you all have dealt with.
All those lawsuits against him are his own fault.

Maybe John would have had a easier road to travel
if he had some decent standards of morals and ethics.

But I suppose that's probably Fritz's fault also.........

Yep.....always some one else's fault.
 
megahurts

megahurts

New Member
JOKER said:
Yes we know John made lot's of mistakes...
but why is it always someone else's fault
Never John's.....

Did you ever think that maybe John caused
most of all of his own problems.

When you have a sleaze bag for a Real Estate Partner
and try to screw every person you all have dealt with.
All those lawsuits against him are his own fault.

Maybe John would have had a easier road to travel
if he had some decent standards of morals and ethics.

But I suppose that's probably Fritz's fault also.........

Yep.....always some one else's fault.
Click to expand...

I'm a believer in taking personal responsibility. BUT a civil lawsuit and a witch hunt from the states attorney are 2 totally different things.

If I am dishonest in business and screw people over, I will get sued. That is the american way and it keeps people honest. Our civil court system works and these types of things should be worked out in civil court.

If I challenge someone in a political race, i should not become the target of the government and a criminal investigation. Evidence should not be fabricated. Witnesses should not be coached to lie.

Are you saying John deserved to be falsely accused and attacked by Fritz because he was partners with Dan? Is that your point? Would Fritz still have come after him had he never ran for States Attorney?

The worst mistake john ever made was getting into politics. If he never challenged fritz in the election none of this would have ever happened.
 
JOKER

JOKER

Great Mills Rd
No what I am really saying is that if
John Mattingly had a better moral compass

The voters would probably think better of him.

Choosing Daniel Brown and participating
actively in a business with him is not necessarily
a crime but it does show a lack of good ethics.

That's the part you all don't understand, being found
guilty or not guilty of the law has nothing to do with
one conducting themselves in a moral and ethical way.

Theres a lot to be said for treating people right and fair.
whether it's legal is another matter entirely.

You can probably legally trick some poor unsuspecting
person out of their land or money.

But that doesn't mean it's RIGHT.
 
megahurts

megahurts

New Member
JOKER said:
No what I am really saying is that if
John Mattingly had a better moral compass

The voters would probably think better of him.

Choosing Daniel Brown and participating
actively in a business with him is not necessarily
a crime but it does show a lack of good ethics.

That's the part you all don't understand, being found
guilty or not guilty of the law has nothing to do with
one conducting themselves in a moral and ethical way.

Theres a lot to be said for treating people right and fair.
whether it's legal is another matter entirely.

You can probably legally trick some poor unsuspecting
person out of their land or money.

But that doesn't mean it's RIGHT.
Click to expand...

Joker you make some really good points here and I agree with you in principle. I guess would you feel differently if the AGC dismissed mattingly of any unethical behavoir or wrong doing?

Further more, do you hold Fritz to the same ethical standards you preach regarding mattingly? There is a lot of DIRT about FRITZ out there. Are all of these stories lies?

There's no doubt about what Fritz did to mattingly, was that ok? was it justified? was it legal?
 
JOKER

JOKER

Great Mills Rd
megahurts said:
Joker you make some really good points here and I agree with you in principle. I guess would you feel differently if the AGC dismissed mattingly of any unethical behavoir or wrong doing?

Further more, do you hold Fritz to the same ethical standards you preach regarding mattingly? There is a lot of DIRT about FRITZ out there. Are all of these stories lies?

There's no doubt about what Fritz did to mattingly, was that ok? was it justified? was it legal?
Click to expand...


What the heck is a AGC ???
Sound like Lawyer talk......

You sure do sound like John Mattingly

Who in the heck would know what AGC
means ......except some Lawyer.........
Us ole local boys are only familiar
with things like SOB.

Yes there is some old dirt
that you and your lying cohorts have been spreading.

By Dirt on Fritz do you mean that
almost 50 years ago when he was a teenager
he had carnal knowledge with a 15 yr old girl.

I never said that Fritz has been perfect and neither has any other human.
The Difference between Mattingly and Fritz is that what you have been
drudging up about Fritz is Ancient History... (a serious mistake made
by a teenage boy) ...all of Mattingly's shady business deals, many recent lawsuits, Missing money ($20,000) paid to him by a client, unsatified liens to Widows and others, etc, etc, etc has all happened in the last year and is still happening.

What this shows is that 50 years ago Fritz showed poor judgement as a teenager. But since that time he outgrew his youthful indiscretions and has a good honorable record of public service, having been re elected many times by the Saint Mary's County Voters........... (Yes I know that according to you we are all just stupid)

But in The last Couple of years it's been quite apparent that John and his Business Partner have been on a two man crime wave, inflicting harm and financial pain to many good St Mary's County people.

As for Fritz persecuting John Mattingly, thats a Joke
Don't you think that all the poor victims of Mattingly and Brown's misdeeds
have made and are still making numerous complaints to the local Legal system.

And that's what a Good States Attorney does .....prosecute persons who commit crimes against the community.

That's why I am voting for Richard Fritz for States Attorney of St Mary's County
 
Clem_Shady

Clem_Shady

New Member
Good Morning Fritz voters!!!!

It's Clem Shady Show time.

We're gonna start you off with a little tune called "Jailbait."

So crank up those cheap little NMCI speakers the Navy bought you and let's rock to something Fritz can relate with!

YouTube - Jailbait Song

:yahoo:
 
F

FOCUSFACTS

New Member
JOKER said:
No what I am really saying is that if
John Mattingly had a better moral compass

The voters would probably think better of him.

Choosing Daniel Brown and participating
actively in a business with him is not necessarily
a crime but it does show a lack of good ethics.

That's the part you all don't understand, being found
guilty or not guilty of the law has nothing to do with
one conducting themselves in a moral and ethical way.

Theres a lot to be said for treating people right and fair.
whether it's legal is another matter entirely.

You can probably legally trick some poor unsuspecting
person out of their land or money.

But that doesn't mean it's RIGHT.
Click to expand...

This is by far the best post on the election forum yet. If Mr. Mattingly can't keep his promises and delibertly lies to people he's taken land from and refuses to pay them for; why does anyone think he'll keep his word to the people of St. Mary's County? Land Owners are sueing him for their money and his unethical behavior in contract deals Mr. Mattingly has implemented for himself as his own lawyer. Mr. Mattingly's actions with his Business Partner Daniel Brown who is a career criminal and what he has done to so many innocent people speaks volumes about the man he is today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top