So how many more months and accidents are going to happen before they fix the road? Are then putting a media strip are they putting in sewer I see signs of both. What is going on with blocking off lanes on 235 for this?
ANYBODY GOT A CLUE?
How many acidents are being caused by the construction? AS opposed to being caused by idiots?
I can't speak to accidents but there are some serious traffic issues that are a direct result of the construction, or rather the demolition as I have yet to see any progress towards constructing anything.
How many acidents are being caused by the construction? AS opposed to being caused by idiots?
LOL
ah, ok, not funny, if you've driven the road - or what passes as a road, even without another vehicle it would be easy to break an axle or a rim or worse.
I can sort of understand the closure of the second left hand turn lane on NB 235, but it really fxxks with traffic
But yes, idiots, misguided souls, whatever. I must continue to remind myself that technically only getting struck by lightning is an accident - i.e. an act of god.
What happens on the roadways is a collision.
Somebody failed to control their vehicle and came to an unplanned stop against another object.
But I agree, WHEN THE F are they going to do something besides leave a crater in the road.
In answer to the OP, I don;'t think anybody knows what's going on.
Your tax dollars at work
It’s like driving through downtown Beirut there but the people are meaner.
I hate when people compare anything to Beirut and they have never been there.....
Just sayin’
Grateful I don't have to go there (or over the bridge, for that matter) every day. ...
I don't know why anyone, in their right mind, would want to work in St. Mary's and choose to live across the bridge in Calvert. Putting a weak single point of failure between two places one has to travel between on a regular basis is not the brightest choice.
I don't know why anyone, in their right mind, would want to work in St. Mary's and choose to live across the bridge in Calvert. Putting a weak single point of failure between two places one has to travel between on a regular basis is not the brightest choice.
Granted, should the bridge fail one day (or require a long time closure) - things will suck for some people for a bit. However, given my daily commute, it don't get overly sympathetic when someone's commute goes from 20-30 mins to 90.
The delay in the work could be for numerous reasons (not the fault of the contractor). Now a days, everything is so regulated by environmental items, MDE and the local braches can dictate how work can progress - requiring sequence of construction steps that are reliant upon the establishment of grass simply to mitigate potential soil movement/wash. Sucks when you have to stop work to wait on grass to take hold before moving onto the next step.
It could be that there are seasonal restrictions which dictate when certain wet utilities can be worked. It could be that the County (or State) issued a contract with a tremendous amount of available float in the schedule so anytime the weather (or site) isn't pristine, the contractor is electing to work elsewhere.
My favorite is when the contractor gets stopped waiting on an existing utility to be relocated. It's usually either one of two things: 1) the contractor was unaware of the presence of the utility (due to inaccurate drawings) or 2) the contractor provided the utility company reasonable time to relocate and the utility company completely failed to hit that window.
Trust me, there isn't a contractor around who wants to have a project sit idle and delayed. It costs money each month in overhead just to maintain the contract. It costs money in field labor as most state requirements don't stop when the job is idle. There are still weekly SWPPP inspections, safety audits, etc. Contractors win jobs by providing the best value (usually lowest cost) and their plan was to build it as quickly as possible and go away.
Well, I was here during the "Crack of '88" and it wasn't "a bit". It was three months.