Scientists Harvest Stem Cells Without Destroying Embryo

sugarmama

New Member
Toxick said:
I think it makes perfectly good sense - and it was explained about 50 pages back...

It's one thing to euthanize, or otherwise kill, someone. (abortion)
It's quite another to desecrate their corpse. (stem-cell harvesting)


I don't see that AT ALL. If you're going to kill someone, why not let the corpse do some good?
And I don't want to hear Vraitard's stupid theory about how one day there's going to be fetus-growing factories where women grow babies just to have them aborted just to get the stem cells. :rolleyes:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Midnightrider said:
well there's a surprise, vrai using selective memory/reading :killingme
Maybe you can find it for me. Please show me where I said that either you or Sugarmama were liberals. Quote it, please. You know how dense I am. :smile:
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
vraiblonde said:
Maybe you can find it for me. Please show me where I said that either you or Sugarmama were liberals. Quote it, please. You know how dense I am. :smile:
yes i do, but i'm not doing your legwork for you. :smack:
 

sugarmama

New Member
vraiblonde said:
Maybe you can find it for me. Please show me where I said that either you or Sugarmama were liberals. Quote it, please. You know how dense I am. :smile:


last time, vraitard...

vraitard said:
I find it hysterically funny to express my pro-abortion sentiments in a group of liberals.


Are you going to deny that you said this, too?
 

Toxick

Splat
sugarmama said:
I don't see that AT ALL. If you're going to kill someone, why not let the corpse do some good?


I disagree too - however I respect her opinion, as it is well thought out and consistant with other stated beliefs.




sugarmama said:
And I don't want to hear Vraitard's stupid theory about how one day there's going to be fetus-growing factories where women grow babies just to have them aborted just to get the stem cells. :rolleyes:


If you get your ass off your back and try talking civilly and listening you might get a better response.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Midnightrider said:
yes i do, but i'm not doing your legwork for you.
Typical of you. You attribute something to me, then I ask you to show me where I said that, and you refuse (because it's not there and you made it up in your head).

This is becoming a pattern with you.
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
Toxick said:
If you get your ass off your back and try talking civilly and listening you might get a better response.
how long have you been around here? cuz thats some funny shiat right there!!! :lmao:
 

sugarmama

New Member
Toxick said:
I disagree too - however I respect her opinion, as it is well thought out and consistant with other stated beliefs.

I'm not saying she's wrong. I'm just saying I disagree. I'm not saying that I respect her opinion, but it is her opinion and that's that.




toxick said:
If you get your ass off your back and try talking civilly and listening you might get a better response.

:confused: What was so hard to understand?
 

sugarmama

New Member
vraiblonde said:
Typical of you. You attribute something to me, then I ask you to show me where I said that, and you refuse (because it's not there and you made it up in your head).
This is becoming a pattern with you.


Didn't i just quote it for you? :confused:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
sugarmama said:
Are you going to deny that you said this, too?
Of course not. But where is your name mentioned in that post? :confused:

Anyway, nevermind. You may have the last word. Feel free to call me as many names as you want, since that seems to be the gist of your discussion skills.
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
vraiblonde said:
Of course not. But where is your name mentioned in that post? :confused:

Anyway, nevermind. You may have the last word. Feel free to call me as many names as you want, since that seems to be the gist of your discussion skills.
Sugar, don't you love haveing a debate with a totally egotistical retard who denies everything they say and accuse you of being the idiot that they are and then stomp off.
 

sugarmama

New Member
Toxick said:
It's hard to understand why you are acting like such a horse's ass about this.

Still :confused:

See, Toxick, this is what people do... converse. One person talks about how/why the agree with the topic of discussion, and the next talks about how/why they disagree with the topic. Then they go back and forth. That is called "conversation." I don't have to agree with Vrai or :brownnose: Vrai.
 

sugarmama

New Member
Midnightrider said:
Sugar, don't you love haveing a debate with a totally egotistical retard who denies everything they say and accuse you of being the idiot that they are and then stomp off.


:yeahthat:

And i also love being called a horse's ass for having a debate with a totally egotistical retard.



:love:
 

Toxick

Splat
sugarmama said:
See, Toxick, this is what people do... converse. One person talks about how/why the agree with the topic of discussion, and the next talks about how/why they disagree with the topic. Then they go back and forth. That is called "conversation." I don't have to agree with Vrai or :brownnose: Vrai.



Aw.. how smarmy and condescending.

I had no idea what a conversation was. :dork:




And you wonder why I called you a horse's ass.


This was no conversation. You were getting all bent out of shape and started namecalling, and becoming insulting.

If you'll review your notes, I don't agree with her either. In fact, we had a pretty lively debate about it this morning. And not once was there any namecalling, flared tempers, insults or fingerpointing. The epithet "tard" wasn't hurled in anyone's direction.


It's pretty much the opposite of what this thread has become over the past few pages.
 
Top