Slingshots used on Tiger??

Pasofever

Does my butt look big?
She really wanted them bad too...You can see how smart those animals are..She stayed in for years if left alone...piss her off and there you go..sad..:frown:
 

cattitude

My Sweetest Boy
She really wanted them bad too...You can see how smart those animals are..She stayed in for years if left alone...piss her off and there you go..sad..:frown:

But you watch...dead boy's family will sue and get money. It's already been said the fence was probably not high enough. Fence needs to be high because we have drunk idiots with slingshots that think it's funny to abuse an animal.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
You know...

...I've been patiently waiting for this story to get a little more intersting.
Just didn't sound like the whole story.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
But you watch...dead boy's family will sue and get money. It's already been said the fence was probably not high enough. Fence needs to be high because we have drunk idiots with slingshots that think it's funny to abuse an animal.

Disgusting, isn't it.
 

forestal

I'm the Boss of Me
I'm not defending three idiots who learned their lesson, but the zoo has a responsibility to keep their animals from getting out of their enclosures. If the fence was too low, someone is going to find themselves called into account. The zoo has the responsibility of protecting everyone, even punks, from animals leaping out of their enclosures. What if the tiger had killed someone who wasn't even involved in this speculated taunting?


But you watch...dead boy's family will sue and get money. It's already been said the fence was probably not high enough. Fence needs to be high because we have drunk idiots with slingshots that think it's funny to abuse an animal.
 

Pasofever

Does my butt look big?
But you watch...dead boy's family will sue and get money. It's already been said the fence was probably not high enough. Fence needs to be high because we have drunk idiots with slingshots that think it's funny to abuse an animal.

Yeah I think I read already where they already plan to sue...I think the judge should say ..Justice served now you pay the zoo $10K for the tiger
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Only you...

I'm not defending three idiots who learned their lesson, but the zoo has a responsibility to keep their animals from getting out of their enclosures. If the fence was too low, someone is going to find themselves called into account. The zoo has the responsibility of protecting everyone, even punks, from animals leaping out of their enclosures. What if the tiger had killed someone who wasn't even involved in this speculated taunting?

...only you.

Don't you feel a twinge of justice that these a holes got attacked by the tiger for what they allegedly did? Don't you think, maybe, that the tiger was able to discern who was attacking him?

Or is the tiger like a gun; a mindless idiot that's gonna kill everyone?
 

forestal

I'm the Boss of Me
Your Schadenfreude is overriding your common sense.

You don't see a problem with the fence being too low? If a cat can get out, it's too low. I wouldn't like to see the punk's families getting a dime, but that fence needed to be higher.

I'm all for the idiots of the world offing themselves, but not at the risk of someone else getting killed.



...only you.

Don't you feel a twinge of justice that these a holes got attacked by the tiger for what they allegedly did? Don't you think, maybe, that the tiger was able to discern who was attacking him?

Or is the tiger like a gun; a mindless idiot that's gonna kill everyone?
 

Mikeinsmd

New Member
I'm not defending three idiots who learned their lesson, but the zoo has a responsibility to keep their animals from getting out of their enclosures. If the fence was too low, someone is going to find themselves called into account. The zoo has the responsibility of protecting everyone, even punks, from animals leaping out of their enclosures. What if the tiger had killed someone who wasn't even involved in this speculated taunting?
Sorta like the US Military has a responsibility to protect her citizens. Even your punk, idiotic, dumbass.

Do me a favor, go taunt a tiger with a slingshot. :jet:
 

forestal

I'm the Boss of Me
and we have a responsibility to protect our military from a dumbass president who sends them off to fight wars they don't have to.

Sorta like the US Military has a responsibility to protect her citizens. Even your punk, idiotic, dumbass.

Do me a favor, go taunt a tiger with a slingshot. :jet:
 
Last edited:

Dork

Highlander's MPD
Your Schadenfreude is overriding your common sense.

You don't see a problem with the fence being too low? If a cat can get out, it's too low. I wouldn't like to see the punk's families getting a dime, but that fence needed to be higher.

I'm all for the idiots of the world offing themselves, but not at the risk of someone else getting killed.


If the fence was kinda low and several peoplethrew your azz into the pen, would that be the zoo's fault? I don't think the witnesses would cooperate if it was just you being thrown in. No Loss.
 

Sonsie

The mighty Al-Sonsie!
Your Schadenfreude is overriding your common sense.

You don't see a problem with the fence being too low? If a cat can get out, it's too low. I wouldn't like to see the punk's families getting a dime, but that fence needed to be higher.

I'm all for the idiots of the world offing themselves, but not at the risk of someone else getting killed.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with knucklehead but look at it like this. OK, the idiots got what they deserved but the cat could just as easily turned on you standing nearby with your kids once he killed the first one. There really should not be any danger in going to the zoo. The fence should have been higher, the moat deeper, whatever... That tiger should not have been able to get out no matter what.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Now see?

Your Schadenfreude is overriding your common sense.

You don't see a problem with the fence being too low? If a cat can get out, it's too low. I wouldn't like to see the punk's families getting a dime, but that fence needed to be higher.

I'm all for the idiots of the world offing themselves, but not at the risk of someone else getting killed
.

...even we share some thoughts.

Now, why do you suppose, if the fence was 'too' low, this didn't happen every day? Or ever? Sure, raise it, but, don't leave out just how provoked this animal must have been. Had the fence been 'too high' these alleged pieces of #### would have gotten away with it.
 
B

Bruzilla

Guest
I have to disagree with you. The problem here was not the height of the fence. If it were the tiger would have escaped long before now. The difference in this case was a couple of drunk a-holes who provoked the tiger with a slingshot. Apparentlym there was never a danger of the tiger getting out and attacking John Q. Public as we now know she could have anytime she set her mind to doing so.

This seems like a clear-cut case of self-defense... oh yeah... they don't have that in CA.
 

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
I'm not defending three idiots who learned their lesson, but the zoo has a responsibility to keep their animals from getting out of their enclosures. If the fence was too low, someone is going to find themselves called into account. The zoo has the responsibility of protecting everyone, even punks, from animals leaping out of their enclosures. What if the tiger had killed someone who wasn't even involved in this speculated taunting?

The enclosure passed inspections for decades as being within the regulations of the law.
 

unixpirate

Pitty Party
...even we share some thoughts.

Now, why do you suppose, if the fence was 'too' low, this didn't happen every day? Or ever? Sure, raise it, but, don't leave out just how provoked this animal must have been. Had the fence been 'too high' these alleged pieces of shiot would have gotten away with it.

:yeahthat:
 
Top