SMCPS is out of control!!!

Fingel_Hymer

Restricted User
I just read the following article

http://thebaynet.com/news/index.cfm/fa/viewstory/story_ID/5732

and from the sound of things the administration changes and the superintendent have things OUT OF CONTROL throughout St. Mary's County Public Schools.

When is the administration and superintendent going to be held responsible for the schools that are out of control?

Sure you can blame the students and you can blame the fact that there is not parental supervision at home, but when my child get harassed, bullied, or assaulted without provocation that should be on the school system and rest firmly on the superintendent.

I mean really. Kids bringing pellet guns to school. Last time I checked a police officer in the heat of the moment isn't going to be able to identify that from a "real" gun, and the student is going to end of shot by the officer. It will be a tragedy that the officer and school administration will have to go through for no reason.

Why are the principals the only one's being held somewhat responsible?
 

thegreatsnozz

New Member
Fingel_Hymer said:
I just read the following article

http://thebaynet.com/news/index.cfm/fa/viewstory/story_ID/5732

and from the sound of things the administration changes and the superintendent have things OUT OF CONTROL throughout St. Mary's County Public Schools.

When is the administration and superintendent going to be held responsible for the schools that are out of control?

Sure you can blame the students and you can blame the fact that there is not parental supervision at home, but when my child get harassed, bullied, or assaulted without provocation that should be on the school system and rest firmly on the superintendent.

I mean really. Kids bringing pellet guns to school. Last time I checked a police officer in the heat of the moment isn't going to be able to identify that from a "real" gun, and the student is going to end of shot by the officer. It will be a tragedy that the officer and school administration will have to go through for no reason.

Why are the principals the only one's being held somewhat responsible?



Yeah the situation is getting worse not better. The superintendent appointed some lame a** committee to ride herd over school safety. Our kids are so vulnerable both inside and outside the school. On any given day, you can get into any one of the schools simply by going through maintenance areas left open to the outside, teachers prop doors open for fresh air or they take kids outside and prop the doors open so that they don't have to use their keys. The school system would be wise to seek the advice of true professionals on building security issues. As far as the threat within goes, what is reported in the article is only the tip of the iceberg. School administrators are urged by the superintendent via Ms. Lyon to suspend as the last resort. High suspensions are bad p.r. and we all know how much the superintendent enjoys his own reputation and reflection. Principals by and large have to send most students right back into the classrooms. Repeat offenders go to the alternate school. This is solving nothing. It is much like having the state highway put up a traffic signal after a death at the intersection. Same thing, the student has to do something almost lethal to be sent away. Although, Ms. Lyon has served on the school safety task force for many years, she lacks the backbone and knowledge to enforce or pontificate on school safety and behavior. Why she is involved as a leader regarding school safety is anyones guess. Probably because she makes the perfect pawn for the superintendent.
 

Barnacle

Member
hairybeast said:
I completely agree that more needs to be done. With No Child Left Behind though, many students are not allowed out of the building for more than 10 days...it ties the hands of those in the education field.


The 10 day rule has nothing to do with NCLB. It is a special education law that says students who receive special education services cannot be suspended for more than 10 days.
 

Fingel_Hymer

Restricted User
aps45819 said:
What's the problem?
You want some kid with a squirt gun to be locked up?


I hope you are being saccastic.... If not:

The problem is simple. I bet you I can point a "squirt gun" at you from twenty feet away and you wouldn't know the difference in the time it takes to make a life or death decision. The high schools all have uniformed officers in them. If he caught a glimpse of anything resembling a gun, he is going to draw a bead and ask you to do as he says, if the kid turns and does anything foolish---- bang he's dead.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
thegreatsnozz said:
Yeah the situation is getting worse not better. .
the answer in the past, particularly at some schools was to not report or to simply not discipline the little felon. In the past. I was told that at certain schools the students were returned to classes and the teachers were reprimanded for sending them to the office for diciplenary action. The reason was simple, if the student was suspended it would be a negative mark on the principals record because it would make the school, and in turn the SMCPS look bad.
So, would you rather have them disciplining the kids or simply sending them back to class armed?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
BernieP said:
the answer in the past, particularly at some schools was to not report or to simply not discipline the little felon. In the past. I was told that at certain schools the students were returned to classes and the teachers were reprimanded for sending them to the office for diciplenary action. The reason was simple, if the student was suspended it would be a negative mark on the principals record because it would make the school, and in turn the SMCPS look bad.
Wow.

And they can't figure out why kids are so disrespectful and act out the way they do.
 
BernieP said:
the answer in the past, particularly at some schools was to not report or to simply not discipline the little felon. In the past. I was told that at certain schools the students were returned to classes and the teachers were reprimanded for sending them to the office for diciplenary action. The reason was simple, if the student was suspended it would be a negative mark on the principals record because it would make the school, and in turn the SMCPS look bad.
So, would you rather have them disciplining the kids or simply sending them back to class armed?
:yeahthat: Fact is... you are better off seeing a number of diciplinary actions rather then little or no numbers at all. Kids are going to act up and test the system regardless of which school or who is principal. To me... schools with next to no numbers are an indication of sweeping the problems under the rug.
 

Fingel_Hymer

Restricted User
Inconsistency is a big problem as well. I talked to several AP secretaries and they all say the same thing. The APs don't give the same punishment consistently. Today you get suspended for acting up, tomorrow it's in school suspension.
 

Jason Kish

New Member
In regards to No Child Left Behind, I think it is a moronic policy that is geared towards training kids to take tests rather than learn to be critical thinkers.

The real world is not a series of standardized tests, multiple guess, true-false, and fill in the blank.

I wonder what would happen if teachers were actually given breathing room to teach critical thought processes, analysis, and projects rather than always being under the gun to get Johnny and Sally a passing score on some test.

I think back to my nuclear navy training and in all my two years of training in math, physics, engineering technology, chemistry, and nuclear science, we took only essay tests. You had questions at the top of the page and blank space under it to write your answers. The only multiple guess exams were general navy advancement exams which were only part of the advancement process.

If I were the Dept of Ed, I'd do away with much of the standardized testing and allow administrators and teachers to the freedom to teach to their unique population of students and relate to them on common turf.

Call me crazy, but a second grade class in Kenosha, WI and a second grade glass in LP, MD might be different kids from different backgrounds and influences and just might need to be taught differently rather than carbon copy them into some government molded exam series of competencies.

This is why I and many of my peers enjoy tutoring so much, because we can teach how we want without bureaucratic nonsense.
 

awpitt

Main Streeter
Jason Kish said:
Call me crazy, but a second grade class in Kenosha, WI and a second grade glass in LP, MD might be different kids from different backgrounds and influences and just might need to be taught differently rather than carbon copy them into some government molded exam series of competencies.


I agree with you but shouldn't there still be some sort of standardized way of assuring that the kids in Kenosha and LP City are all meeting certain minimum standards? It seems that multiple choice/true-false type of tests are the easiest way to do that. Essay style tests make it more difficult because you can have three different teachers grading one student’s essay answer and you’ll end up with three different grades because each teacher has their own unique thought process.
 
Last edited:

Tinkerbell

Baby blues
I have first hand experience with schools pushing stuff under the rug.

When my oldest was in elementary school, she had to deal with an idiot boy on the bus bullying her every day. She dealt with it pretty well, until she comes home one day and tells me that this boy said to her: "I'm going to come to your house one night and break into your bedroom window and kill you and write "B----" on the wall in your blood."

This was VERY disturbing to me - and coming from a 4th grader! :yikes: Why did he say this? Because she told him he had buck teeth, because he was picking on her again. I think his reaction was a quite a bit over the top.

So I went to the school and talked to the principal. She said he was already suspended from the bus for other reasons, so my daughter wouldn't have to deal with him. I tried to push it further, but they wouldn't listen to me and they reprimanded my daughter for telling the little SOB that he had buck teeth. They said if she hadn't said that, maybe he wouldn't have said what he did. :yikes: I was so stunned I didn't know how to react. The cops wouldn't have anything to do with it. I regret I didn't push it even further - and I probably should have. Luckily she's not around the idiot much anymore. She sees him in middle school but just stays away from him.
 

beamher

Well-Known Member
BernieP said:
the answer in the past, particularly at some schools was to not report or to simply not discipline the little felon. In the past. I was told that at certain schools the students were returned to classes and the teachers were reprimanded for sending them to the office for diciplenary action. The reason was simple, if the student was suspended it would be a negative mark on the principals record because it would make the school, and in turn the SMCPS look bad.
So, would you rather have them disciplining the kids or simply sending them back to class armed?

you have got to be talking about great mills high :yay: this is what they do
 

Barnacle

Member
awpitt said:
I agree with you but shouldn't there still be some sort of standardized way of assuring that the kids in Kenosha and LP City are all meeting certain minimum standards? It seems that multiple choice/true-false type of tests are the easiest way to do that. Essay style tests make it more difficult because you can have three different teachers grading one student’s essay answer and you’ll end up with three different grades because each teacher has their own unique thought process.

Every state has its own assessments that are different from every other state's. Maryland has the Maryland State Assessments (MSA), Virginia has Standards of Learning (SOL-- a very unfortunate set of letters!), etc...
 

sparkyaclown

Active Member
beamher said:
you have got to be talking about great mills high :yay: this is what they do
They are not the only ones with this attitude. I've heard the same rumors about a certain Middle School in Charles County :whistle:
 

sparkyaclown

Active Member
Nucklesack said:
The policy is failing because the Teachers and School systems are not adequetly teaching the students, and due to financial pressure (schools monies are tied to Testing results) are now teaching student how to pass the tests instead.

WRONG! The policy is failing because you cannot force a student to learn. The teachers and schools are not failing the students. The parents are failing their own children. With the rare exception, most students who fail to improve do so through their own election. They don't turn in work, refuse to participate in class and the behavior is pretty much reinforced through the parents lack of action or worse yet rewarded.
 
Top