So E.Jean Carroll...
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
Only in America can falsely claiming someone raped you is NOT defamation, but denying it and calling the accuser a liar - IS.
OccamsRazor
Well-Known Member
#metoobutnotyou
CPUSA
Well-Known Member
You would be WRONG there, retard...
Can't wait for you to disappear when that House of Cards you think is so sturdy comes crashing down...
CPUSA
Well-Known Member
Much like your entire life...
Gonna be a disappointing year for you, Pookums!
Unfortunately, he can only think as far ahead as his current posting here on the forum. He can't think past the current page he's on.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
She is going to buy Rachel a new Strap on and they will try it out in the dressing room.
Only in *Democrat* America.
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Armed conflict in our future?
Trump 'Victim's' Cringeworthy Laugh Over Legal Victory Shows How Unserious She Really Was
Carroll also accused former CBS Chief Les Moonves of rape, but she didn't bring a lawsuit against him because she said, "he'd just deny it." In this latest case brought by Carroll, she accused Trump of defaming her when he denied the attack.
The jury did not find the president liable for "rape" but thought he might have been liable for an attack of some sort. As a result, she brought another cause of action against the president, accusing him of defaming her for denying that the rape happened.
Trump does what he usually does. He went on offense. The left-wing Independent described the messages Trump put on Truth Social that he subsequently took down. They are the same messages the jury thought were worth $65 million in punitive damages.
[clip]
Initially, she said in print that the year was 1994. The problem was that Donna Karan didn't make the dress until one or two years after she said the attack occurred. So Carroll changed the date of the alleged attack. The media were fine with it.
When it was pointed out that her "attack" was the exact same storyline as a "rape fantasy" role-playing subplot of a 2012 "Law and Order: Special Victims Unit" episode, she claimed never to have seen the show. She was asked about it on the stand during the May 2023 trial. Here's how the New York Post reported the awkward colloquy.
Simply astonishing that a jury would give this weirdo the time of day, you mean.
And in last May's civil trial, Carroll was caught in another lie when she claimed to have fronted all the money for her case, but the money was given by a shadowy political group that was funded in part by a name you've heard recently: Reid Hoffman, who founded LinkedIn.
Her lawyers should be disbarred. They know damn well she's lying, and yet they took the case anyway and cherrypicked a judge that would silence rebuttal and a jury that would find in her favor (which isn't hard in NYC).
Good luck getting paid, hustling whores.
Good luck getting paid, hustling whores.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Lawyers do not work for clients, they work for money, and their share of this 83 Million dollars is why they took the case.
They know their client is lying, anyone with a brain knows that. No way can I picture Donald Trump raping this woman in a changing booth and she doesn't scream, doesn't call the police, doesn't go for a rape kit at the hospital, Does not know the date it happened, and claimed she was wearing a dress that wasn't even made in the year she claimed it happened.
The names of every juror should be published so we can ask them what evidence they saw that convinced them to vote for the payoff.
All that my eventually come out.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I believe all of that has already come out Herb, and it makes the jury look like fools and the Judge look corrupt, but she is still one step closer to the money. Maybe at the appeal Trump will get a real Judge and Jury.
itsbob
I bowl overhand
What facts?? This wasn't a criminal trial, facts don't matter, just probability.. it is POSSIBLE that Trump did it, so pay up. No evidence, no witnesses, for something that happened 30 years. And lest we forget that NY State changed the laws so she could sue him.