Sperm Donor ordered to pay Child Support to Lesbo couple...

Qurious

Im On 1.
:popcorn:

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania — A sperm donor who helped a lesbian couple conceive two children is liable for child support under a state appellate court ruling that a legal expert believes might be the first of its kind in the U.S.

A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271116,00.html

oh boy........... :lmao:
 

pixiegirl

Cleopatra Jones
Qurious said:
:popcorn:

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania — A sperm donor who helped a lesbian couple conceive two children is liable for child support under a state appellate court ruling that a legal expert believes might be the first of its kind in the U.S.

A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271116,00.html

oh boy........... :lmao:

The process was very informal — Jacob was inseminated at home.

I'm guessing he stuck it to get her knocked up???
 

Pete

Repete
Well this is a strike against the gay community particularly the lesbians. How many guys are going to be lining up to squirt in a petree dish for their lesbian pals now that they know they can get hooked up with child support for 21 years?
 

Sharon

* * * * * * * * *
Staff member
PREMO Member
Coming soon...

Heather has two mommies...






and now daddy has to pay them money.
 

baileydog

I wanna be a SMIB
That is so wrong. I agree the man should not have to pay and Im a woman. Now if the lezzies broke up then which ever was suppose to be the daddy should have to pay. You have to pay to play.
 

Qurious

Im On 1.
I can partially see why he has to pay. He wanted to be involved in their lives and let them call him daddy.

How many sperm donors do you know that want to be in the lives of the mom and the child???

Paying anything for a child that biologically is yours (even if you did give up your parental rights) says your liable....and obviously by this case the courts sees it the same way.
 

Pete

Repete
Qurious said:
I can partially see why he has to pay. He wanted to be involved in their lives and let them call him daddy.

How many sperm donors do you know that want to be in the lives of the mom and the child???

Paying anything for a child that biologically is yours (even if you did give up your parental rights) says your liable....and obviously by this case the courts sees it the same way.
After reading the story in full I agree. he was more than a sperm donor so the title is misleading.
 
I read the article. He took an active part in their lives, and they called him "Papa". He should have to pay.
 
W

Wenchy

Guest
huntr1 said:
I read the article. He took an active part in their lives, and they called him "Papa". He should have to pay.

The sperm donor died in March. He can't pay anything. :lmao: He's dead, stroked out, croaked. :dead:

They are now fighting for his social security survivor benefits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mizteresa1965

New Member
Yeah, the story said "Part of the decision came down because he was so involved with them," Jacob said Wednesday. "It wasn't that he went to the (sperm) bank and that was it. They called him Papa."

I agree with the courts.
 

mizteresa1965

New Member
Wenchy said:
The sperm donor died in March. He can't pay anything. :lmao: He's dead, stroked out, croaked. :dead:

They are now fighting for his social security survivor benefits.

Those children are entitiled to his SS.
 

Sharon

* * * * * * * * *
Staff member
PREMO Member
Shortly afterward, a court awarded her about $1,000 a month in support from Shultz-Jacob. Shultz-Jacob later lost an effort to have the court force Frampton to contribute support — a decision that the Superior Court overturned April 30.

Frampton's Social Security survivor benefits may also help reduce Shultz-Jacob's monthly obligation.

The man died in March. While he was alive he was never forced to contribute support. I see two greedy biatches fighting over money.
 
W

Wenchy

Guest
mizteresa1965 said:
Those children are entitiled to his SS.

I agree.

The way they went about the insemination was not kosher. The whole thing was iffy.

The fact remains that he will not be paying child support because he is :dead:
 

Pete

Repete
Wenchy said:
I agree.

The way they went about the insemination was not kosher. The whole thing was iffy.

The fact remains that he will not be paying child support because he is :dead:
I don't agree there. Just because he climbed on instead of making his delivery into a styrofoam cup doesn't change their intent, the fact he acted like a "daddy" did.

Maybe lesbo #1 didn't mind wiener and figured a few minutes of humping was more cost effective than paying some doc a couple grand to inject the goo :shrug:

The intent was for the chick couple to have a spawn as their own. The method they used to order the mayo for their sandwich doesn't change that. Sounds like the bull didn't want to get whacked with child support so she all of a sudden got technical.

Judge Pete says no SS benefits. Lesbo's wanted to play house, lesbos pay just like anyone else.
 

jenbengen

Watch it
I am speechless on this one. The story was so complicated that I lost track after the first paragraph. Soap operas can't make this stuff up!
 
He was not just a sperm donor. He was involved with their lives. They new him as their father and even called him "Papa". I don't see how his kids can be denied of benefits owed to them by their father's SS account.

Like Pete said... if you don't want to wake up one day financially obligated to a child of your flesh and blood... protect your sperm.
 

Pete

Repete
kwillia said:
He was not just a sperm donor. He was involved with their lives. They new him as their father and even called him "Papa". I don't see how his kids can be denied of benefits owed to them by their father's SS account.

Like Pete said... if you don't want to wake up one day financially obligated to a child of your flesh and blood... protect your sperm.
Wonder if lesbo #2 adopted? This is a trick the states use. They go the extremes to be sure someone is financially responsible to try and be sure the kids mom doesn't go on the dole.

In Maine a guy who lived with the mom and kid for 8 years was ordered to pay CS because he "willingly acted in the role of father".
 
Top