Statement by the President on Actions in Response to Russian Malicious Cyber Activity and Harassment

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
" Today, I have ordered a number of actions in response to the Russian government’s aggressive harassment of U.S. officials and cyber operations aimed at the U.S. election. These actions follow repeated private and public warnings that we have issued to the Russian government, and are a necessary and appropriate response to efforts to harm U.S. interests in violation of established international norms of behavior.

All Americans should be alarmed by Russia’s actions. In October, my Administration publicized our assessment that Russia took actions intended to interfere with the U.S. election process. These data theft and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest levels of the Russian government. Moreover, our diplomats have experienced an unacceptable level of harassment in Moscow by Russian security services and police over the last year. Such activities have consequences. Today, I have ordered a number of actions in response. "

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/29/statement-president-actions-response-russian-malicious-cyber-activity
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
If he took this so seriously, why do you suppose he didn't respond to protect the election before they could attack it?
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Because if Hillary won as programmed, there would be no need to burn these guys to attack Trumps legitimacy.
 

bilbur

New Member
What I want to know is what happened to his public statement that never in the recent history of our country has anyone been able to hack or rig our elections. Remember that, when he told Trump to stop whining? I hate Trump as much as the next guy but he won and now Obama is whining and crying about it just like he told Trump to stop doing. This election has brought out the hypocrite in all of us.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
What I want to know is what happened to his public statement that never in the recent history of our country has anyone been able to hack or rig our elections.



the only thing exposed was DNC conclusion in the election to get H+ elected ....
 

tommyjo

New Member
What I want to know is what happened to his public statement that never in the recent history of our country has anyone been able to hack or rig our elections. Remember that, when he told Trump to stop whining? I hate Trump as much as the next guy but he won and now Obama is whining and crying about it just like he told Trump to stop doing. This election has brought out the hypocrite in all of us.

Can any of you people read the English language?

I've not heard once where Mr. Obama or any higher up official in an intelligence agency said the Russians "rigged" or "hacked" the election.

The charge is that they hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks as a means to influence the dunderheads in our electorate (you know the ones on here who salivated every time Wikileaks posted something new...if you don't believe Wikileaks had any influence read the stupidity posted on here in Sept and Oct).

No voting machines have been reported to have been hacked. No results tampered with.

All that was needed to happen was post false or damaging stories...the dunderheads believe EVERYTHING that is negative. No matter how many times and how much evidence you present...the dunderheads ONLY believe the most negative accounts. Just read the commentary on here any and every day.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
In October, my Administration publicized our assessment that Russia took actions intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.

Asessment---- the evaluation or estimation of the nature, quality, or ability of someone or something.

A guess made with bias in this case. We don't want an assessment, we want proof.

Obama sent taxpayer money to interfere in Netanyahu's election. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/

Someone tell me why Obama thinks it's ok to interfere in other people's elections , but not for others to interfere in ours?

He only has a few days left, why can't he just stay on the Golf Course and STFU, instead of trying to interfere with Trumps transition.?
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Can any of you people read the English language?

I've not heard once where Mr. Obama or any higher up official in an intelligence agency said the Russians "rigged" or "hacked" the election.

The charge is that they hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks as a means to influence the dunderheads in our electorate (you know the ones on here who salivated every time Wikileaks posted something new...if you don't believe Wikileaks had any influence read the stupidity posted on here in Sept and Oct).

No voting machines have been reported to have been hacked. No results tampered with.

All that was needed to happen was post false or damaging stories...the dunderheads believe EVERYTHING that is negative. No matter how many times and how much evidence you present...the dunderheads ONLY believe the most negative accounts. Just read the commentary on here any and every day.



Oh, I read just fine. We believe that those emails were authentic. Is that belief incorrect? I'm open to sources that prove they were false. And I dont mean two or three that had the headers of footers stripped, the body of the emails. Thats why conservatives dont give a rats ass where they came from. You know how you keep other countries from influencing elections with news about your corruption? DONT FREAKIN PRACTICE IT LIKE A SEVEN YEAR OLD WITH HIS NEW RECORDER HE JUST GOT IN SCHOOL TODAY. BECAUSE THAT"S HOW YOU GET THAT. It's really that damn simple. And expelling people and closing up stuff doesn't change the fact that these people made the Aquino regime look like Snow Freaking White.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Oh, I read just fine. We believe that those emails were authentic. Is that belief incorrect? I'm open to sources that prove they were false. And I dont mean two or three that had the headers of footers stripped, the body of the emails. Thats why conservatives dont give a rats ass where they came from. You know how you keep other countries from influencing elections with news about your corruption? DONT FREAKIN PRACTICE IT LIKE A SEVEN YEAR OLD WITH HIS NEW RECORDER HE JUST GOT IN SCHOOL TODAY. BECAUSE THAT"S HOW YOU GET THAT. It's really that damn simple. And expelling people and closing up stuff doesn't change the fact that these people made the Aquino regime look like Snow Freaking White.

^^^^^^^^^^^^ There hasn't been one suggestion that the emails exhibited were false.^^^^^^^^^^
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
I found the Russian response hysterically funny!

Meanwhile, Russian foreign ministry official Konstantin Dolgov called the sanctions futile and counterproductive.
“The outgoing administration has no grounds, neither political nor moral rights for such harsh and destructive steps towards the bilateral relations with Russia,” he told the Interfax news agency. “I am sorry for the harsh wording but I don't have other words for it. This not just an agony of the 'lame ducks,' but of the 'political corpses.'”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ald-trump-presidential-election-a7501356.html

:lmao:
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
All that was needed to happen was post false or damaging stories...the dunderheads believe EVERYTHING that is negative. No matter how many times and how much evidence you present...the dunderheads ONLY believe the most negative accounts. Just read the commentary on here any and every day.



but they were not false ....
NOT ONCE did the actors involved say the email WAS FAKE - only it might be fake, be careful what you read, and refused to discuss the email because it was Stolen
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Can any of you people read the English language?

I've not heard once where Mr. Obama or any higher up official in an intelligence agency said the Russians "rigged" or "hacked" the election.

You're an ignorant dolt!

CIA Concludes Russian Interference Aimed To Elect Trump

The CIA has concluded that Russia intervened in the 2016 election specifically to help Donald Trump win the presidency, a U.S. official has confirmed to NPR.

"Before, there was confidence about the fact that Russia interfered," the official says. "But there was low confidence on what the direction and intentionality of the interference was. Now they [the CIA] have come to the conclusion that Russia was trying to tip the election to Trump."

The official adds: "The reason the assessment changed is that new information became available" since Oct. 7, when the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence released a joint statement accusing Russia of interfering with the American election process.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member

TJ's point is that the votes were not hacked; as in, the voting machines that were electronic, or the actual votes reported, or anything like that was not tampered with. "Interference" is nebulous, like "Climate Change", or "Hope and Change". Meaningless words that make you think you heard something tangible, but without ever saying anything. Like when your coworker shows you a picture of her hideous troglodyte baby, and you smile and say, "wow, that's quite a little baby" with enthusiasm in your voice - you never say anything good at all, but momma goes away feeling proud of the hideous hairy potato she gave birth to.

What did the Russians do to "interfere"? We know the DNC leaks were leaks, not hacks. We know the publishing of the DNC and Podesta e-mails were by someone who specifically says they came from DNC people (and potentially the NSA), and specifically says Russia wasn't involved. We know that all of the intelligence agencies won't tell Congress why they think it was Russians; the only ones who will say it are politicians who really hate Trump (and the net effect is that Trump's presidency is illegitimate).

Smoke, mirrors, impressions. TJ has bought it, and thinks anyone who sees through the smoke is stupid. That's all there is to her rant.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
If he took this so seriously, why do you suppose he didn't respond to protect the election before they could attack it?

Because if Hillary won as programmed, there would be no need to burn these guys to attack Trumps legitimacy.

Which begs some questions... Why is Obama responding to this, at this time, the way he is? Is it just to put roadblocks in front of Trump? Is it to create more division between us and Russia? Or is Obama somehow trying to find a way to delegitimize the election; (my conspiracy side) even deem the election invalid?
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
IMO Obama is acting like a child that has his favorite toy taken away.

The Democrats worry about what Trump will do during his term.
I worry about the clown we have now for the next 20 days.

My opinion also is that the CIA will say anything Obama tells them to say.
During Obama's reign the CIA has become a joke.
It's time it was totally rebuilt from the ground up.
It was never meant to be a political agent and it's services were never meant to be broadcast and used for political purposes.
The CIA was meant to be in the background, not where Obama has placed it.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
TJ's point is that the votes were not hacked...

I keyed in on the word "rigged" as to mean the Russian hacked the emails, fed them to Wikileaks in an effort manipulated the minds of voters against Clinton. Neither here nor there, if the emails never existed, there wouldn't have been a problem to begin with. If democrats had operated with some level of honesty the outcome would likely have been much different. No matter what the circumstances, karma has a way of working.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I keyed in on the word "rigged" as to mean the Russian hacked the emails, fed them to Wikileaks in an effort manipulated the minds of voters against Clinton. Neither here nor there, if the emails never existed, there wouldn't have been a problem to begin with. If democrats had operated with some level of honesty the outcome would likely have been much different. No matter what the circumstances, karma has a way of working.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Exactly^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
I keyed in on the word "rigged" as to mean the Russian hacked the emails, fed them to Wikileaks in an effort manipulated the minds of voters against Clinton. Neither here nor there, if the emails never existed, there wouldn't have been a problem to begin with. If democrats had operated with some level of honesty the outcome would likely have been much different. No matter what the circumstances, karma has a way of working.

I agree with you completely. But, the evidence doesn't point to "rigging" or hacking the "election", so to speak. There is evidence (i'm sure) of people hacking the DNC. It seems inconceivable there's no one trying to hack the DNC, the RNC, and key people around those in powerful positions or influential relationships.

But, the charge isn't that Russia "hacked the election". The charge is that Russia "hacked", and that Russia "influenced". Two separate things. TJ and those like TJ want people to confuse and conflate these two things as if they were the same. The best way to shut up such idiots is to ask them point blank what Russia did to influence the election. We know it wasn't russia who leaked the emails to Wikileaks, so they can't use that.

[video=youtube;NJG75FJkjr8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJG75FJkjr8[/video]
 

Pete

Repete
So the Russians hacked the DNC (Not a governmental agency) due to lax email security and exposed corruption and obnoxious, elitist behavior and a national party's collusion with one candidate to defeat another candidate and they are being punished.

I have a few questions.

1. Why are we not giving them a medal for pulling back the curtain on a group of very bad people working for a very bad person?

2. I hear the DNC raised or had access to nearly a Billion dollars. Why did they not set up a secure network to communicate their nastiness and scandal securely?

3. Since nothing in the hacked emails has been denied, have the democrats apologized for being nasty and corrupt, prior to punishing the people who exposed them for being nasty and corrupt?

4. Is Obama pursuing the people who hacked and released the Billy Bush tape or Trumps Tax returns that Hillary referenced during the debates? That certainly had an impact.

5. Why is a national party using gmail?

6. Is Podesta really so stupid he fell for a phishing scam?

7. Didn't the Russians like Hillary's reset button?

8. Are they really mad at wikileaks and the Russians for hacking and releasing or are they mad they were outdone at their own tactics?

9. Do they think the Russians really give a #### what Obama thinks?

10. Maybe Hillary and Obama should just press the reset button really, really hard this time.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Think about this:

Southern Maryland Online's server is more secure than our Secretary of State's server was.

That's about pathetic.
 
Top