Supreme Court Ruling on 2nd Amendment...

[blacklabman]

expected today. I expect them to uphold our rights.

 

[awpitt]

expected today. I expect them to uphold our rights.

I hope they do.

 

[RadioPatrol]

expected today. I expect them to uphold our rights.

While I hope that they do ........

I am expecting it to go the other way ....

The Socialists are taking over this country with their entitlement programs and The 2A is just in their way of eventual total domination ........

 

[ImnoMensa]

It appears the whole thing is up to Kennedy, and I dont have much faith in him.

 

[Gtmustang88]

I hope they do.

^+1

 

[Larry Gude]

We get...

...to hear what this means;

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[drmatsci]

This sin't about whether you have the 'right' to a gun, its about limiting that right. The government has already established they can limit that right, so I fully expect the supreme court to side with the city.

My 2 cents.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

expected today. I expect them to uphold our rights.

I hope they do but after their blanket ruling yesterday that rape is not worthy of the death penalty, I fully expect this decision to swing in favor of the District.

 

[chernmax]

expected today. I expect them to uphold our rights.

Monday, Wednesday, today!!! Lets hope...

 

[Vince]

...to hear what this means;

I'm pretty good when it comes to the English language, I thought I knew what that meant?

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

I'm pretty good when it comes to the English language, I thought I knew what that meant?

It's pretty clear... The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. :shrug:

I don't have faith in the court to uphold our rights though.

 

[Bruzilla]

I bet they split the baby. They'll affirm that it is an individual right, strike down the DC and Chicago laws, but say more "reasonable" restrictions are okay in the name of public safety.

 

[aps45819]

This sin't about whether you have the 'right' to a gun, its about limiting that right. The government has already established they can limit that right, so I fully expect the supreme court to side with the city.

That's what this is about.
The city says you don't have the right to own a gun.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

I bet they split the baby. They'll affirm that it is an individual right, strike down the DC and Chicago laws, but say more "reasonable" restrictions are okay in the name of public safety.

You'd be wrong again. This court is very good at blanket decisions. It will be all or nothing.

 

[drmatsci]

That's what this is about.
The city says you don't have the right to own a gun.

Don't you have the right to a .22 in DC, just no handguns?

If you can own a .22 rifle, that's a gun the last time I checked.

They will say soemthing about balancing public safety, the right to life, against the freedom to bear arms and that the pursuit of life means the government can manage or put limits on the right to bear arms.

 

[MMDad]

Victory!!!!!

 

[This_person]

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

Victory!!!!!

Oh, and DC? Ha ha effing ha ha ha

 

[awpitt]

Whooo Hoooo! There is still hope.

 

[ImnoMensa]

Yes its a red letter day for American Freedom.