WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
NOT guilty as long as the jury doesn't mail in their vote.
The Rittenhouse Incident
- Thread starter kom526
- Start date
glhs837
Power with Control
We're good then, never a problem with mailed in votes, right?
Ben & Jerry's blasted for spreading misinformation about Kyle Rittenhouse, inventing hypothetical scenario to bring race into the case
Progressive ice cream brand Ben & Jerry's dished out misinformation about Kyle Rittenhouse, plus completely invented a hypothetical scenario regarding the controversial shooting to racialize the powderkeg court case. The Vermont-based woke ice cream purveyor was called out for spreading a false narrative online.
Ben & Jerry's – which is owned by multinational conglomerate Unilever that boasted revenue of approximately $58 billion in 2020 – promoted a fallacy about Rittenhouse that has been debunked for more than a year. The Lake County State's Attorney's Office released a statement on Oct. 13, 2020, clarifying that Rittenhouse never had possession of the firearm used during the Kenosha riots while he was in Illinois.
Fact-checker Lead Stories published an article this week titled: "Kyle Rittenhouse Did NOT Cross State Lines With An AR-15."
Progressive ice cream brand Ben & Jerry's dished out misinformation about Kyle Rittenhouse, plus completely invented a hypothetical scenario regarding the controversial shooting to racialize the powderkeg court case. The Vermont-based woke ice cream purveyor was called out for spreading a false narrative online.
Ben & Jerry's – which is owned by multinational conglomerate Unilever that boasted revenue of approximately $58 billion in 2020 – promoted a fallacy about Rittenhouse that has been debunked for more than a year. The Lake County State's Attorney's Office released a statement on Oct. 13, 2020, clarifying that Rittenhouse never had possession of the firearm used during the Kenosha riots while he was in Illinois.
Fact-checker Lead Stories published an article this week titled: "Kyle Rittenhouse Did NOT Cross State Lines With An AR-15."
The Rittenhouse-Trial Judge Isn’t a Trumpist
Among the many accusations that have been leveled at Schroeder this week are that he is “biased,” that he is “prejudiced,” that he is a secret “conservative,” “right-winger,” or “Trumpist,” that he is a “a gun nut,” that he is a “a racist” or wannabe member of the Klan, that he is the “worst judge in town,” and that he is attempting to parlay this trial into …
Among the many accusations that have been leveled at Schroeder this week are that he is “biased,” that he is “prejudiced,” that he is a secret “conservative,” “right-winger,” or “Trumpist,” that he is a “a gun nut,” that he is a “a racist” or wannabe member of the Klan, that he is the “worst judge in town,” and that he is attempting to parlay this trial into …
Liberal law professor excoriates prosecutors, media over 'crash and burn' of Kyle Rittenhouse trial
What about the media?
Unfortunately, how one perceives what happened at the trial largely depends on your media consumption, Turley observed.
"[T]he reason for this developing failure [by the prosecution] depends greatly on what media you are watching other than the trial itself. It is either the product of systemic errors or systemic racism," Turley wrote.
Turley explained:
What about the media?
Unfortunately, how one perceives what happened at the trial largely depends on your media consumption, Turley observed.
"[T]he reason for this developing failure [by the prosecution] depends greatly on what media you are watching other than the trial itself. It is either the product of systemic errors or systemic racism," Turley wrote.
Turley explained:
Last edited:
Vox publishes a piece on ‘the enduring power and privilege of white tears’ after Kyle Rittenhouse breaks down
Rittenhouse “resorted to a tried-and-true strategy for white men,” Smith writes:
Rittenhouse “resorted to a tried-and-true strategy for white men,” Smith writes:
"Some compared Rittenhouse to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s reaction when questioned during his confirmation hearings about Christine Blasey Ford’s credible allegations of sexual assault."
And they expect people to take them seriously? Seriously?!
I haven’t taken those asshats seriously since the 80s."Some compared Rittenhouse to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s reaction when questioned during his confirmation hearings about Christine Blasey Ford’s credible allegations of sexual assault."
And they expect people to take them seriously? Seriously?!
I'm with you there, but to put out an opinion as fact, and back it up with something that has been proven to be a lie, is just astounding. The people who ingest this BS "news" and believe it, are too stupid to be allowed to choose our "leaders".
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
These are some sick Mother phuckers.. These are journalists? No they are mentally sick low life Mother honkers, vile examples of the worst kind of human trash. They need to be stepped on and squashed like the insects they are.
Tech
Well-Known Member
with spunk.
Vox isn't news or anything legit - it's a rando blog run by Marxists from NYT and WashPo. I'm not sure why it gets attention except that the news people want it to. Twitchy is freaking obsessed with Vox, which is the only reason I know it exists. Tucker Carlson also regularly gives them free (or maybe not) advertising.
Like you said, they're human trash and not to be used as a legitimate source of news or even opinion.
LightRoasted
If I may ...
If I may ...
Zionist/Bolsheviks doing what they can to maintain division. "By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War" is their motto. Everyone should be boycotting their crappy highly processed fake ice cream anyways because it is crap, just like these two are.
Zionist/Bolsheviks doing what they can to maintain division. "By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War" is their motto. Everyone should be boycotting their crappy highly processed fake ice cream anyways because it is crap, just like these two are.
glhs837
Power with Control
So the small businesses that will burn will be less burnt if Malik from Detroit tosses the match? Where they are from doesnt really matter in that context.
I can't recall a recent time where the media was clamoring for a guilty verdict. The Chauvin case was already determined before trial began. Casey Anthony was probably the last time there was a hint of what the media thought should happen. Before that, it was them hoping for a not guilty verdict for OJ.
TPD
the poor dad
My shower thoughts about a jury -
If I ever sat on a jury, I would want to be the foreman because I like to be in charge and I think I am a leader that can bring people to a consensus. The first thing I would do once given the case would be to take a poll, anonymously written on a piece of paper, of the 11 jurors as to whether you think the defendant is innocent or guilty. This would give me a idea how long and how much work will be needed to come to a consensus. If it's a 6-6 vote, I think at that point we just play hangman for the next 12 hours and then declare to the judge we are hung. If there is a consensus on innocent or guilty, we can immediately adjourn and give the judge our verdict and we have saved a lot of time. But if it's an 11-1 vote, with me being the 1, then I got some work to do to convince the other 11 that I am right! Bring in the pizza and the adult beverages because it's going to be a loooong week.
So for those that have sat on jury deliberations, how does it really work?
If I ever sat on a jury, I would want to be the foreman because I like to be in charge and I think I am a leader that can bring people to a consensus. The first thing I would do once given the case would be to take a poll, anonymously written on a piece of paper, of the 11 jurors as to whether you think the defendant is innocent or guilty. This would give me a idea how long and how much work will be needed to come to a consensus. If it's a 6-6 vote, I think at that point we just play hangman for the next 12 hours and then declare to the judge we are hung. If there is a consensus on innocent or guilty, we can immediately adjourn and give the judge our verdict and we have saved a lot of time. But if it's an 11-1 vote, with me being the 1, then I got some work to do to convince the other 11 that I am right! Bring in the pizza and the adult beverages because it's going to be a loooong week.
So for those that have sat on jury deliberations, how does it really work?
