StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
No, for there to be fraud there has to be harm. Where is the harm?
No in fact that is not what the law says.
Have you ever heard of attempted robbery?
No, for there to be fraud there has to be harm. Where is the harm?
No, for there to be fraud there has to be harm. Where is the harm?
Really? Basic legal concepts on Fraud - WHAT CONSTITUTES FRAUDNo in fact that is not what the law says.
Really, seems you are one of those educated idiots. How much did it cost you to be so stupid?God you are poorly educated.
I never made such a claim, the claim you are trying to drag over here has nothing to do with the type of paper you moron.Remember when you thought that using new paper for ballots would require the legislator to convene and pass a new law
Really, seems you are one of those educated idiots. How much did it cost you to be so stupid?
I never made such a claim, the claim you are trying to drag over here has nothing to do with the type of paper you moron.
Really? Basic legal concepts on Fraud - WHAT CONSTITUTES FRAUD
Under common law, three elements are required to prove fraud: a material false statement made with an intent to deceive, a victim’s reliance on the statement and damages. So as not to confuse you damages = harm.
That...coming from you....God you are poorly educated.
The only person to lie is you. The changes involved procedural changes to the voting process to select electors that were not approved by the legislatures.Same difference they were all minor administratives change you tried to pass off as changing electors.
You are willing to lie to try to prove your point.
It paints everything else you say in a bad light and since you never post links or proof of anything it shows you are jsut running your mouth.
Guilty by summary judgement by a judge as demented as you. Yeah, a proud day for justice, bet you cheer on Hamas too.Trump has already been found guilty through a summary judgement
This is the penalty phase.
Please pay attention.
The only person to lie is you. The changes involved procedural changes to the voting process to select electors that were not approved by the legislatures.
Do you need a link to the Constitution? Are you too stupid to find it on your own?
Bad light? You're so freaking dim that you suck the light away. You truly are a black hole.
Guilty by summary judgement by a judge as demented as you. Yeah, a proud day for justice, bet you cheer on Hamas too.
Misspelled and/or misused words, improper grammar, and incorrect punctuation.He was a Taxi cab driver for many years and actually worked his way up to his postiion. More than i can say for Trump or you.
No one changed anything to effect the selection of electors you lair.
If they did you would have been able to prove it imstead of posting about allowing more mail in ballots and expanding access to voting.
Your brain is fried from Trump and Newsmax.
Go for a walk in the park. Read the paper. Learn something.
Really? He probably sucked as a cabbie too.He was a Taxi cab driver for many years and actually worked his way up to his postiion. More than i can say for Trump or you.
They sure did, dropping the signature requirement, thus not ensuring the identification of the submission did impact the selection.No one changed anything to effect the selection of electors you lair.
It has been proven that the process was changed without legislative authority to do so.If they did you would have been able to prove it imstead of posting about allowing more mail in ballots and expanding access to voting.
Neither Trump nor NewsMax are in my daily life. I just hate seeing "anyone" persecuted to the level that you and all you asses think are just.Your brain is fried from Trump and Newsmax.
I live in the wilderness, better than any park you will ever come across. Read the paper? You really are crazy, today's papers are only good for lining the bottom of a birdcage or for covering a table to pick crabs.Go for a walk in the park. Read the paper. Learn something.
No, for there to be fraud there has to be harm. Where is the harm?
God you are poorly educated.
Remember when you thought that using new paper for ballots would require the legislator to convene and pass a new law
You missed lair/liar.Misspelled and/or misused words, improper grammar, and incorrect punctuation.
All alerts that indicate spamming and phishing. Of course, ignorance is a definite possibility also.
Really? He probably sucked as a cabbie too.
They sure did, dropping the signature requirement, thus not ensuring the identification of the submission did impact the selection.
It has been proven that the process was changed without legislative authority to do so.
Neither Trump nor NewsMax are in my daily life. I just hate seeing "anyone" persecuted to the level that you and all you asses think are just.
I live in the wilderness, better than any park you will ever come across. Read the paper? You really are crazy, today's papers are only good for lining the bottom of a birdcage or for covering a table to pick crabs.
And I did learn something that apparently you haven't, spending big dollars on an education does not in any manner improve intelligence.
Right here, that really is the bottom line.
ST isn't gonna like this one iota but any decision that is made in this court in New York, will indeed be completely overturned.
No one cares about your BS he is still going to be POTUS unless the dems cheat someone in again.Trump was angry and confused today in court:
Trump was briefly more focused after a morning break but soon started to go off on tangents again. Asked about information on his 2021 financial statement, Trump said, “I was so busy in the White House. My threshold was China, Russia, and keeping our country safe.” Wallace responded, "The question was actually about this property value," while also noting that Trump was out of office in 2021.
Trump also used his time on the stand to complain that the AG's office had undervalued his Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago.
The attorney general's office had noted the Palm Beach County assessor appraised its market value to be $18 million to $27.6 million from 2011 to 2021, while Trump’s balance sheet put its value at $426 million to $612 million — a number Trump testified he thought was too low.
“The values are far bigger than what they are on the financial statements,” Trump said, adding it was "50 to 100 times" more valuable than the AG said. "I don’t know how you got that number," he added, calling it "absolutely crazy."
A combative Donald Trump testifies in $250 million civil fraud trial
Trump wasted little time before complaining about Democratic "haters" while answering questions about his business before a judge he's blasted as "totally unhinged."www.nbcnews.com
Not really as that happens everyday did you not try that on your parents basement...lolNo. No one said it was.
However Trump fought his tax assessments and tried to get them lowered while inflating the supposed value of his properties to get more loans.
That is fraud