Larry Gude
Strung Out
Na nee na nee boo boo
And to think they feared trump wouldn't bring about equality for all.
Na nee na nee boo boo
I went to school with a chick from England I argued with all the time; it is an article of faith among many Brits that England won WWI and II with nary any help from us when the reality is nothing like that. At all.
And to think they feared trump wouldn't bring about equality for all.
I could never be your equal.
It's far different talking to someone who wasn't alive to experience it than it is someone who actually went through it. From the perspective of the citizens, the raids on England were unprovoked, regardless of the boneheaded moves by Chamberlain and Churchill. .
And another thing; We all have a talent or two. Do what you're good at, I say. And I do my level best around here to keep it on topic and NOT hit below the belt.
I don't recall Larry me being the one here who posted his poor business skills and then in the true liberal way to blame their bad business decisions on everything else but the poor decisions that you made.
Just like the ranting response you posted earlier, it's the stereotypical liberal response to curse, rant and attack instead of a response taking responsibility like a adult.
I don't recall Larry me being the one here who posted his poor business skills and then in the true liberal way to blame their bad business decisions on everything else but the poor decisions that you made.
Just like the ranting response you posted earlier, it's the stereotypical liberal response to curse, rant and attack instead of a response taking responsibility like a adult.
Battle of Britain is generally understood to have begun in July of 1940.
Dunkirk happened in May and June.
Are you honestly trying to say Londoner'ers thought the blitz was unprovoked???
Houston, we have a problem, here. There is NO way ANYONE in the UK was unaware of Englands attempt to fight, again, on the continent and, just as impossible that ANYONE did not know about Dunkirk.
And, guess what? England had bomber Germany six times before Hitler ordered the first bombing of England. And, guess what else? Churchill started the bombing of civilians.
You don't know this because you're content with the version of history we've all been fed. That should not prohibit you from wanting to know HOW we were lied to.
None of this excuses Hitler. The point, the entire point, is that we see Churchill for who he was. Especially those who complain about the media and truth.
Fail to see what Larry's (or anyone's) business practices has to do with any of these discussions. I know Larry can defend himself, but I just wanted to jump in and say your comments were way out of line.
I'm surprised you can even breath with your nose stuck so far up Larry's ass.
Is it fair to say that following the invasion of Poland, Britain was meeting their promise to come to Poland's aid if Germany invaded them; and subsequently Britain declared war on Germany? Once war is declared, are they not at war? Now, rather than go into Poland (like Poland believed they would) to provide military protection, Britain attempted to cut off munitions supplies by bombing their main munitions depots. It was a futile attempt. But it seems they got Germany's attention. In any event, Germany drew first blood. .
Fail to see what Larry's (or anyone's) business practices has to do with any of these discussions. I know Larry can defend himself, but I just wanted to jump in and say your comments were way out of line.
I wish you'd go do a little reading on your own. This needs context that is best if you make up your own mind.
And I will say , I fail to see where the missing or not missing bust of MlK or Churchill has anything to do with WW2.