Are we taking bets?
Now that's funny............
Are we taking bets?
nJune and July 2017, Strzok worked on Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation into any links or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government.......now will you shut up?
OK Genius.......you can believe anything want, but facts are factsJust as I've said: not part of the SCO.
OK Genius.......you can believe anything want, but facts are facts
No I didn’t, but you win....Indeed. And the fact is that Strzok is not with the SCO. You said so yourself.
No I didn’t, but you win....
nJune and July 2017, Strzok worked on Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation into any links or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government.......now will you shut up?
So he’s still part of the SCO, is he? Is that now your position?
Now I am positive that you are Midnightrider's MPD. Shouldn't you be finding one of his posts so you can agree with yourself?
I think when they SAY agent, they're more closely aligned with the idea that he is more Manchurian candidate than anything else - that he is operating on their behalf. And if that is the case, they sure wasted their money, didn't they? Trump is arming the Ukrainians, opposing the Russians in the Middle East and may yet trigger another arms race - as opposed to the treatment he got from his predecessor who set a red line and did nothing, failed to arm the Poles and Ukraine and gave away the Crimean peninsula without a blink, not to mention abandoning Georgia.
If the Russians have some kind of leverage over him, they're really wasting their efforts - unless they actually don't have any.
Any opinion piece that offers a false choice in the headline can and should be safely ignored.
Another option is that that he got in over his head without realizing it. I see "Russian agent" thrown around a lot, but I'm not aware of anyone suggesting that he knocked on Putin's front door and asked to be a double agent.
The book "Shattered" by liberal Jonathan Allen who is a Politico editor and Amy Parnes who writes for the left-leaning The Hill said:That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.
I rather think it's too soon to say.
As Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai answered the question of what he thought was the significance of the French Revolution: "It's too soon to tell."
and it paled in comparison to almost every other group out there. Geez, even the Sierra Club outspent the Russians.