Trump Trial
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Is the Trump Appeal still going on? I figured it would be open/shut.
Leftists Decried Comey For Flagging Hillary’s Emails. Now They Love Tanya Chutkan’s Election Interference
“If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute — or appear to be — election interference,” Chutkan wrote. “The court will therefore continue to keep political considerations out of its decision-making, rather than incorporating them as Defendant requests.”
The unsealing comes just weeks after Chutkan unsealed Smith’s 165-page brief, which alleges Trump used “false claims of election fraud to disrupt the electoral process” in 2020. Smith argues that Trump’s “refuse[al] to say whether he would accept the election results” of 2020 (which saw unelected leaders usurp the authority of state legislatures and unilaterally change election procedure) and Trump’s expressing concern about potential fraud are grounds for prosecution and jail time.
Chutkan’s unleashing of Smith’s 11th-hour brief and her subsequent unsealing of “evidence” have been brushed aside by the left — even though Chutkan’s mention of “political consequences” is an admission her decision amounts to election interference — because they’re useful fodder.
ABC News pretended that Chutkan’s decision to unseal the “evidence” was her effort to push “back on Trump’s argument that the release was politically motivated to influence the 2024 presidential election.”
“Chutkan faulted Trump’s lawyers for peddling what she called political arguments rather than engaging with the relevant factors to justify sealing the evidence in the case,” ABC News reported.
Meanwhile, Newsweek used the unsealing to write a piece about a “mountain” of “evidence” against Trump — even though The Washington Post, for example, called the unsealing “unrevelatory.”
But such blatantly obvious attempts to sway the public’s perception of one of the candidates constitutes election interference — at least according to the standard used in 2016.
Then-FBI Director James Comey announced in October of 2016 that the agency would be investigating Hillary Clinton’s emails. The announcement set off years of blaming Comey for causing Clinton to lose the race.
They just couldn’t stand it anymore and had to say it out loud, to make sure Trump got the message. Yesterday, Politico ran an ugly story headlined, “A Modest Proposal - A Deal to Stop Trump From Trying to Overturn the Election.” You already knew this was why they prosecuted him six ways from Sunday, but now they’ve spelled it out in painstaking detail.
Juleanna Glover, who penned the op-ed, owns a DC-based “public affairs advisory firm” that allegedly helps Republican candidates. She’s not helping Republicans much now though.
Instead, Juleanna has pitched us a deal: What if the federal and state prosecutors running rings around the Trump lawsuits circus all agreed to drop their charges if Trump will just say he lost the 2024 race? Just say the words.
Juleanna compared the potential deal to Judge Merchan’s gag order. She pointed out that Trump actually complied with the gag order — shocking far-left partisans who believe President Trump is mentally and ethically incapable of waiting for a crosswalk signal, much less controlling what he says.
Intentionally or unintentionally, Juleanna gave away the whole sordid game. Her proposal is not new. The lawsuits were always about coercing Trump to say he lost. That’s how political lawfare works. If Trump had dropped out, the lawfare would have magically vanished. Biden would have generously pardoned him, to avoid humiliating and dividing the nation.
But, it’s too late now, Juleanna. Too late.
☕️ TRUMP’S OCTOBER SURPRISE ☙ Friday, October 25, 2024 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
BRICS Summit ends; signs of life in Canada; scientific self-censorship; dems' deal for President Trump to quit; market trends; Trump's earth-shaking October Surprise changes everything; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
PJay
Well-Known Member
"JUST IN: The Department of Justice and Jack Smith immediately end their cases against Donald Trump. The DOJ cited their policy that presidents can't be prosecuted however it was assumed they would work up until the "last day." "What's interesting here is that the DOJ is moving to end them even before he takes office, citing the longstanding DOJ policy that sitting presidents can't be prosecuted." "And there were some thought that maybe special counsel Jack Smith was going to sprint through the finish line, was going to work up until the last day, force Trump to fire him, wait till a new Attorney General was appointed." "But that does not appear to be the thinking inside the department. The thinking is that these cases can't go forward."
LightRoasted
If I may ...
For your consideration ...
They now clearly see the writing on the wall. They are now in job protection mode. Though I doubt it will help anyone at the DOJ.
They now clearly see the writing on the wall. They are now in job protection mode. Though I doubt it will help anyone at the DOJ.
That building and the FBI both need to be fumigated.
Clear out anything higher, GS 11 and start over.