U.N. climate report will shock the world

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

The page tried to explain it to people like you, but I guess I just have to put it right here for you, don't I.

Since you're only capable of thinking one level deep.

I know you kept ignoring this bit of information...which of course is central to the whole point.

But it doesn't fit their agenda so it won't be aknowledged by them.

 

[Kerad]

Why are you dumb enough to debate the internet in a thread about global warming?

The thing Comrade Gore doesn't get is that putting his name on the film automatically made it unbelievable to 1/3 of the country. Granted, it did make it a hit for another 1/3, but if the goal was to educate, why alienate?

The other 1/3 are mouthbreathers and don't understand the issues, so why bother.

I agree that we can and should take steps to be cleaner, but every time a politician is involved I can't believe anything that is said. And that means politicians from both sides, not just the guy that created an Internet that already existed.

Why are you dumb enough to think I give a crap what you have to post?

 

[Kerad]

Who cares what a UN report says. Anyone can make a report say what they want it to. The Un is not a creditable organisation in any form.

We all know according to the UN ,that Global warming is the fault of the United States and George Bush

EXACTLY! Amen! Preaching to the choir!

I don't want to believe it, so it isn't true. :highfive:

 

[Pete]

I heard Bucky the Elvis Impersonating Squirrel's HBO special "Swing Low" beat MSNBC in the 25-54 Money demographic in that time slot.
<a href="http://photobucket.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y124/dpete2q/smilies/thnutsack-elvis.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a>

 

[MMDad]

The page tried to explain it to people like you, but I guess I just have to put it right here for you, don't I.

Since you're only capable of thinking one level deep.

I know you kept ignoring this bit of information...which of course is central to the whole point.

Even you can admit that there is a large difference between
1. sponsoring a bill to promulgate technology that already existed and
2. creating the Internet

Either way, this thread is about the climate. I have to agree with the earlier post that politicians only divide when they get involved with the issues. Gore's documentary strengthened the resolve of both the right and the left. It broadened the gap. If you want to convince people, don't use a politician.

 

[Kerad]

Even you can admit that there is a large difference between
1. sponsoring a bill to promulgate technology that already existed and
2. creating the Internet

Either way, this thread is about the climate. I have to agree with the earlier post that politicians only divide when they get involved with the issues. Gore's documentary strengthened the resolve of both the right and the left. It broadened the gap. If you want to convince people, don't use a politician.

Your buddy 2A brought the Al Gore/internet into this.

If a politician feels strongly about an issue, is it not his/her duty to try and do something about it? Or are politicians just supposed to kiss the President's butt and look the other way...only existing to maintain the status quo?

I say they should try to make a difference.

 

[MMDad]

Your buddy 2A brought the Al Gore/internet into this.

If a politician feels strongly about an issue, is it not his/her duty to try and do something about it? Or are politicians just supposed to kiss the President's butt and look the other way...only existing to maintain the status quo?

I say they should try to make a difference.

If the difference they make hurts the cause, should they still do so? Gore hurt the cause by dividing the issue on political lines. The environment should not be a political issue.

Also, 2A is not my buddy. I severely peved him off a while back in the religion forum, so I don't think he likes me. I respect him, but I don't agree with most of his stands on issues. I agree with his gun stand, but that's about it.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

I heard Bucky the Elvis Impersonating Squirrel's HBO special "Swing Low" beat MSNBC in the 25-54 Money demographic in that time slot.

Yep, even though MSNBC beat out even American Idol.

 

[Kerad]

If the difference they make hurts the cause, should they still do so? Gore hurt the cause by dividing the issue on political lines. The environment should not be a political issue.

Also, 2A is not my buddy. I severely peved him off a while back in the religion forum, so I don't think he likes me. I respect him, but I don't agree with most of his stands on issues. I agree with his gun stand, but that's about it.

Alright...sorry about the "buddy" thing.

We could go around in circles on this, as we ususally do on most subjects. You say that Gore hurt the cause by attaching his name to it. I say this has always been one of Gore's "projects", and it's Republicans who are making this a political thing, by just dismissing it all because Gore's working it.

I could almost understand it if it was just Al Gore, and not the majority of the world's scientists sounding the warning bells. Oh yeah, I forgot...the right doesn't trust scientists either. At least not the one's who may be providing evidence that opposes the what they want to believe.

This whole thing reminds me of the cigarette industry, back when they were fighting claims that cigarretes are bad for you.

Anyways...

 

[PsyOps]

This is just another one of those liberal-based agendas that says: "Nothing is capable of surviving without our intervention."

The earth has survived catastrophic events for eons and I trust the earth’s ability to heal and clean itself more than I will ever trust our government to fix.

 

[Kerad]

This is just another one of those liberal-based agendas that says: "Nothing is capable of surviving without our intervention."

The earth has survived catastrophic events for eons and I trust the earth’s ability to heal and clean itself more than I will ever trust our government to fix.

The Earth is fully capable of healing and cleaning itself, when it comes to naturally occurring events. It's the additional damage done by manmade pollution that's causing stress to the system.

 

[Lenny]

http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/01/24/tuesdays-numbers-25

8PM - P2+ (25-54)
O’Reilly Factor – 2,393,000 viewers (579,000)
Situation Room– 939,000 viewers (269,000)
Countdown w/ Olbermann – 821,000 viewers (370,000)

Cripes, looks like O'Reilly is wiping the floor with your guy!

 

[PsyOps]

The Earth is fully capable of healing and cleaning itself, when it comes to naturally occurring events. It's the additional damage done by manmade pollution that's causing stress to the system.

It's my contention that 1) There is not one single thing that man has made that didn't come from the earth and 2) Man is part of nature and what man does is part of nature and nature will deal with it as nature deals with everything in the natural course of things.

 

[Lenny]

He was a part of the legislation passed that did lead to the invention of what we call the internet.

You right wingers will say almost anything.

You have got to be freaking kidding me. Some of you righties will just cling to your talking points no matter how long ago they've been shot down.

Do your firggin' research, Sparky. dARPANET was there before the Tennessee traveller was in the Congress. :yaflippinmoron:

Previously, he had served in the United States House of Representatives (1977-85) and the United States Senate (1985-93) for Tennessee.

The first version of an IP based network was funded by the US Department of Defence in 1969 as a means of communicating with defence contractors and universities doing military research. Robustness was provided over the imperfect network by packet switching technology, developed by another DoD engineer Paul Baran, as a means of ensuring failure resistant communications. The myth still persists that the Arpanet was invented to make a nuclear counter strike possible amid post-apocalyptic devastation. However, this has more to do with retrospective fantasies about the Cold War than with the reality of internet history. The illustration is part of one of the first skethches of the network architecture, showing one host and one node, from September 1969.

- DARPANET (or DARPANet) is a term sometimes used for the ARPANET, the early network from which today's Internet evolved. The Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the original developers of the early packet-switched network that came to be called the ARPANET, was renamed the (U.S.) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 1971. For this reason, it is often assumed that the ARPANET was then called the DARPANET. However, the Internet Society's own history of the Internet, written by its chief inventors, suggests that it continued to be called ARPANET until ownership was transferred to other groups. See ARPANET for more information.

You and your MPD (Forestallll) keep doing this stupid #### on here. No wonder your bankrupt thoughts are flushable.
__________________

 

[Kerad]

It's my contention that 1) There is not one single thing that man has made that didn't come from the earth and 2) Man is part of nature and what man does is part of nature and nature will deal with it as nature deals with everything in the natural course of things.

Okay.

 

[PsyOps]

Okay.

A word response from Kerad. I haven't been here too long but I believe that may be a first.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

Do your firggin' research, Sparky. dARPANET was there before the Tennessee traveller was in the Congress. :yaflippinmoron:







You and your MPD (Forestallll) keep doing this stupid #### on here. No wonder your bankrupt thoughts are flushable.
__________________

Your research on the global warming is coming, assclown. As for your piece of #### response there once more claiming that I am forestal is perhaps the stupidest thing I have heard on here. But that's what I would expect from someone as low and as stupid as you. You have nothing constructive to say, you only attack others. Perhaps it's time for me to take out the trash... As for the internet, when did the internet become avaliable to colleges and universities, and who was a part of that legislation?

 

[Lenny]

Your research on the global warming is coming, assclown. As for your piece of #### response there once more claiming that I am forestal is perhaps the stupidest thing I have heard on here. But that's what I would expect from someone as low and as stupid as you. You have nothing constructive to say, you only attack others. Perhaps it's time for me to take out the trash... As for the internet, when did the internet become avaliable to colleges and universities, and who was a part of that legislation?

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

Cripes, looks like O'Reilly is wiping the floor with your guy!

OK, so O'Reilly's prodominently conservative psychpathic audience put him in no. 1 at 8pm? Want to tell me the ratings now for Brian Williams?

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

The Earth is fully capable of healing and cleaning itself, when it comes to naturally occurring events. It's the additional damage done by manmade pollution that's causing stress to the system.

There is a direct relation to carbon-dioxide levels and temperature.

<IMG SRC=http://physics.gmu.edu/~hgeller/Geller753/meth_temp.gif >

<IMG SRC=http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/10/13/GR2005101300122.gif >

<IMG SRC=http://www.ecologic.org.nz/content/images/IPCC_graph2_400.jpg >

As you can see, carbon dioxide levels are going up.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/11/650000-years-of-greenhouse-gas-concentrations/

http://blog.mises.org/archives/005235.asp

So, Assclown (Lenny), are you smarter than scientists and leading universities?