Verdict in in Pants Suit
- Thread starter rack'm
- Start date
itsbob
I bowl overhand
I was hoping that not only would they rule in favor of the Chung's but the Judge could order him to pay the Chung's for their legal fee's and anguish that he put on them..rack'm said:
It was ridiculous from the start, and this guy is a JUDGE!??
You take a lawyer that can't hold down a job (I find that almost unbelievable, how much of a screw up do you have to be for that) and make him a Judge.. yep, good choice there..
Tinkerbell
Baby blues
Third paragraph:itsbob said:
"Plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, Jr. takes nothing from the defendants, and defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung are awarded the costs of this action against the plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, Jr.," the ruling read.
Tinkerbell
Baby blues
Yeah, apparently this really caused them great financial hardship.itsbob said:
Now... to hope that crazy judge boy doesn't do the whole appeal route and make it even worse on them.
you don't wear pants.
kwillia
n/a
:shocker:
Man Wants Do-Over In $54M Pants Suit
A customer who sued a dry cleaner for $54 million over a missing pair of pants has asked the judge who threw out the widely mocked case to reconsider, saying she committed a "fundamental legal error."
Roy L. Pearson, a local administrative law judge, argued Wednesday that District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff failed to address his legal claims.
Bartnoff had ruled that the business owners did not violate the city's consumer protection law by failing to live up to his expectations of a "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store.
"The court effectively substituted a guarantee of satisfaction with 'reasonable' limits and preconditions for the unconditional and unambiguous guarantee of satisfaction the defendant-merchant chose to advertise for seven years," Pearson wrote. "That was a fundamental legal error."
If Bartnoff rejects Pearson's motion, he could take the matter to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
The motion comes less than a week after the South Korean immigrant owners of Custom Cleaners asked the judge to order Pearson to cover $83,000 in legal fees.
"(The) Plaintiff's motives have been clear -- quite simply, to harass Defendants and to attempt to utterly destroy their lives," attorney Christopher Manning wrote.
Man Wants Do-Over In $54M Pants Suit
A customer who sued a dry cleaner for $54 million over a missing pair of pants has asked the judge who threw out the widely mocked case to reconsider, saying she committed a "fundamental legal error."
Roy L. Pearson, a local administrative law judge, argued Wednesday that District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff failed to address his legal claims.
Bartnoff had ruled that the business owners did not violate the city's consumer protection law by failing to live up to his expectations of a "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store.
"The court effectively substituted a guarantee of satisfaction with 'reasonable' limits and preconditions for the unconditional and unambiguous guarantee of satisfaction the defendant-merchant chose to advertise for seven years," Pearson wrote. "That was a fundamental legal error."
If Bartnoff rejects Pearson's motion, he could take the matter to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
The motion comes less than a week after the South Korean immigrant owners of Custom Cleaners asked the judge to order Pearson to cover $83,000 in legal fees.
"(The) Plaintiff's motives have been clear -- quite simply, to harass Defendants and to attempt to utterly destroy their lives," attorney Christopher Manning wrote.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
Not enough...
He put these poor people out of business.
jenbengen said:The best part of it all is that this guy has to pay all of the court costs for the dry cleaners.Serves him right.
He put these poor people out of business.
Dymphna
Loyalty, Friendship, Love
Good call....Don't think that idiot will be a judge much longer either.
But now he's got someone else to sue.
Pants suit judge sues to get job back