SmallTown
Football season!
That is definately Bush's motto!FromTexas said:Forget what they say, look at what they do.![]()

That is definately Bush's motto!FromTexas said:Forget what they say, look at what they do.![]()
kom526 said:Obviously everyone else got the same email from MDGOP that I did. These statements by the dems are absolutely reprehensible.
vraiblonde said:You are completely and totally beyond pathetic. How you can equate photo ID cards to Democrats making racial slurs is just beyond my comprehension and is not even worthy of the slightest bit of debate.
People like you, sir, are why Democrats suck and will continue their downward spiral until they have to hide underground like the vermin they are.
Or maybe the Presidents approval rating being at 35% might just say something!
I'd be more interested in how many people could actually *explain* exactly what anyone did that was wrong.Racingwolf said:Lady, maybe you are dumber than I thought!! And speaking of downward spiral, amybe you should look at your buddies in the white house and you will see a MAJOR downward spiral.![]()
![]()
![]()
HOW IMPORTANT TO THE NATION IS THE CIA LEAK MATTER?
CIA Leak
Great importance - 51%
Some importance - 35%
Little/no importance - 12%
Clinton-Lewinsky (1/98)
Great importance - 41%
Some importance - 21%
Little/no importance - 37%
Whitewater (3/94)
Great importance - 20%
Some importance - 29%
Little/no importance - 45%
Iran-Contra (2/87)
Great importance - 48%
Some importance - 33%
Little/no importance - 19%
Watergate (5/73; Gallup Poll)
Great importance - 53%
Some importance - 25%
Little/no importance - 22%
Hmmmmm I see your little Republican buddies leak probe is right up there with WATERGATE!!!!!
Or maybe the Presidents approval rating being at 35% might just say something!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That would be a legitimate comment if there were any evidence that you'd ever HAD a thought.Racingwolf said:Lady, maybe you are dumber than I thought!!
Wow! I agree with Kweisi! I wonder if he has reprimanded or fired his campaign spokesperson for their contrary statement yesterday (which I already posted)But Kweisi Mfume, who is running for senator, yesterday outright condemned the comments by his fellow black Democrats.
"Racially tinged attacks have no place in this campaign for U.S. Senate," said Mr. Mfume, who has chided his party's lack of support for his campaign. "If they did, I could very well be the object of public racial humiliation, based on my skin color, by people who don't like my politics."
FromTexas said:http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20051101-104932-4054r.htm
Good old Kweisi Mfume is in there, too. Its nice to see the former president of the NAACP showing his true colors... Oh wait! I said colors! That may be racist of me!![]()
Well, that's good to know. :whew:Terps said:Look, I have no problem with black people being Republicans
And god knows the Post is "just the facts".If this article was in the post it would be one thing but the times has a way of putting a fun little spin on their journalism.
Did you notice that Bush is a two-term President? That makes him mainstream.Also, Steele is such a Bush lover and is not a mainstream candidate.
Like what, for instance? Get a job? Quit relying on the dole? Stop using drugs and beating your woman? Get an education and make something of yourself?He stands for everthing that is against what most black people stand for which is a little shocking to the black democrats.
I know this issue has been covered here many times before - but a few good Googles on the Washington Times would show it's had its fair share of journalism awards. In its twenty year history, it's pretty impressive.Terps said:Look, I have no problem with black people being Republicans, I think the more diversity of parties we have the better. A few things, the Washington times is not the most "reliable journalism" out there. .
Let's be honest about this -- this article would NEVER be in the Post, even if it were the most glaring news item of the day - unless it could somehow tell the same story and make Republicans look bad.If this article was in the post it would be one thing but the times has a way of putting a fun little spin on their journalism..
And what would be the worst one of those? Give me a quote.Also, Steele is such a Bush lover and is not a mainstream candidate. He stands for everthing that is against what most black people stand for which is a little shocking to the black democrats. .
"Bush lover" "cannot make decisions for the best of their state" - exactly WHAT has he done to earn this - is it merely by being black, and a Republican? Aren't you doing what you claim you're NOT doing?I dont think this needs to be a race issue, just an issue of who is the best candidate for 06 and clearly we dont need to elect another Bush lover who cannot make decisions for the best of their state.
He wants to take away the free gubbermint cheese.vraiblonde said:What exactly does Michael Steele espouse that is against what "black people stand for"?
Terps said:I dont think this needs to be a race issue, just an issue of who is the best candidate for 06 and clearly we dont need to elect another Bush lover who cannot make decisions for the best of their state.
Also, Steele is such a Bush lover and is not a mainstream candidate. He stands for everthing that is against what most black people stand for which is a little shocking to the black democrats.