We are losing the war on terror

[dustin]

If there is another attack it will be because Osama is still free, and he's recruiting more men then our troops are killing.

 

[itsbob]

They can recruit more. We can continue to hunt them all down and kill them. Its a war of attrition they can not win as long as we stay the course and do what needs to be done. Something your man Kerry will forget about in a few years... no matter his monday morning quarterback promises. He wants to look good and change continually to try and fit an image. He doesn't have the resolution to stick with one action and see it through.

Hunt them down?? Hell they are coming to us.. Every Americna hater, and everyone that wants to kill Americans are coming out of hiding and heading right for IRAQ instead of the US. This is the best thing that could happen.. instead of 10K or 50K of them hiding, they're signing up to come fight us..

I say BRING THEM ON!! and the question would have to be asked, would you rather fight them in IRAQ or in Des Moines?

 

[UrbanPancake]

Oh really? Where WAS he? Next to Waldo?



If there's another attack, it will be on Kerry's watch - and he'll blame Bush for it, because that all he's good for.

Well Bush should have focused on Osama, but instead he got side tracked and went after Saddam after Cheney told him his old friend Halliburton could make a killing off of the tax payers.

 

[Pete]

No. But you don't insult me. Last time I checked my father isn't embarrassed of me. But now that I think about it yours probably is after seeing you run around with those crazy signs on 301.

I appologize, I did not know that you do not know who your daddy is. I would never make fun of a bastard.

 

[UrbanPancake]

I appologize, I did not know that you do not know who your daddy is. I would never make fun of a bastard.

That's nice. By the way have you found your Mother yet? Here's hint if you haven't, check under Cheney.

 

[SamSpade]

OSAMA GOT AWAY!!!! Bush dropped the ball on this one. If there is another attack it will be because Osama is still free, and he's recruiting more men then our troops are killing.

I forgot to notice that you didn't answer a single bit of my post, except to trot out a liberal regurgitation (thus proving my point about lacking original thought).

We did NOT divert troops - having 25,000 troops or having 200,000 troops in Afghanistan, you don't gain effectiveness by increasing troop strength. It's like adding fireman to putting out a burning house. Of course, you don't know that, because there's this string on your side where you pull out the cord, and you repeat what's been programmed into you.

We - don't - NEED - thousands - more - troops - in - Afghanistan. Get it? Iraq is another THEATER in the war on terror. It is not THE war on terror, because we are fighting in MANY places. It just gets the most news, because we have the most guys there. My point was, people like you are too stupid to get this, that in WW2 you wouldn't have understood that to beat the Nazis, you fight them in many places - not just Germany. To win the war on terror, there are many places - and Afghanistan has enough troops there.

 

[itsbob]

That's nice. By the way have you found your Mother yet? Here's hint if you haven't, check under Cheney.

Figured it would have to be a Republican to impregnate a woman to have a man of great intellect and backbone.. no democrat would be able to.

 

[SamSpade]

Well Bush should have focused on Osama, but instead he got side tracked and went after Saddam after Cheney told him his old friend Halliburton could make a killing off of the tax payers.

He IS going after Osama, moron. We have a 26 nation alliance in Afghanistan. My nephew is there, in a special forces unit. You really need to bone up on Operation Enduring Freedom.