Vince
......
This ##### Andrea Yates. ought to be executed in the worst possible way.
Execution by drowning!Vince said:This ##### Andrea Yates. ought to be executed in the worst possible way.
Dutch6 said:Execution by drowning!
Even if she is found "Innocent" by reason of Insanity she wont walk away. She will be institutionalized probably for the rest of her life. what judge is going to review the case in 15 years when she petitions for release, see the circumstances and sign her release order?greyhound said:I agree that for someone to do what she did they must be crazy. She is pleading "Innocent by insanity". In order for her to be found innocent by reason of insanity, her lawyers must prove that she did not know that what she did was wrong. She doesn't have the capasity to know right from wrong. IMO, I don't think they can prove this. But I have seen stranger things happen.
baswm said:I hate hearing of children who are too young to protect themselves tortured at the hands of their parents who are suppose to love and protect them. I think there is a special place in hell for people who harm their children.
Pete said:I don't understand the trial. It is cut and died, she is insane. Feelings for revenge or not; NO, and I repeat NO sane person drowns their own kids. Would I like to see her fry, part of me yes because any human mind that is capable of rationalizing drowning their own kids needs to be removed from the gene pool, but was she sane? Without a doubt no.
Life in prison or an institution for the criminally insane.
Quite possibly very true. I think the exception here for me is that "sane people commit heinous crimes all the time" for some reason; love, money, joy of killing, hate, revenge, she seems to have no motivation at all except for the voices in her head. :shrug:Bruzilla said:She has shown no history of being insane. She may be disturbed, but that is not the same as being insane. Sane people commit heinous crimes all the time. People think that women are for some reason above committing barbaric acts against their children, but sympathy junkie mothers kill their children all the time, and they are quite sane. Yates is every bit the cold-blooded, sociopathic, killer that Dalmer, Gacy, and Bundy were.
And I think this is BS also. Why aren't they allowed to show the evidence? Afraid the jury would find her more guilty than she already is?The judge is not allowing prosecutors to show evidence about the injuries suffered by the other two children, 2-year-old Luke and 3-year-old Paul.
Vince said:And I think this is BS also. Why aren't they allowed to show the evidence? Afraid the jury would find her more guilty than she already is?
greyhound said:I agree that for someone to do what she did they must be crazy. She is pleading "Innocent by insanity". In order for her to be found innocent by reason of insanity, her lawyers must prove that she did not know that what she did was wrong. She doesn't have the capasity to know right from wrong. IMO, I don't think they can prove this. But I have seen stranger things happen.
rack'm said:
I can see it now.....her chest deep at low tide with a nice 200 lb. block of stone with just enough chain so that she could tread water.....and me with a bucket of popcorn, just waiting for the tide to come in.
mainman said:My latest pay per view event...
Susan Smith vs. Andrea Yates in a bare knuckled mortal kombat fight to the death... The winner gets stoned to death by the spectators...
Who wants a ticket?
I knew I could count on you...rack'm said:I'll take 100 tickets please