Actually, an attack upon our service members, at home or abroad, would be a direct threat and would authorize the Executive to immediately use military force.
Where's the "fire and fury"?
- Thread starter PsyOps
- Start date
Actually, an attack upon our service members, at home or abroad, would be a direct threat and would authorize the Executive to immediately use military force.
PsyOps
Pixelated
We did it with Obama didn't we? That 'line in the sand' bit?
And then the line was crossed and Barry did nothing. We'll see what happens when it gets crossed - if it gets crossed - this time around.
This_person
Well-Known Member
I agree. Was this aimed directly at US troops? Was it even aimed? Was it even really a threat?
This_person
Well-Known Member
And then the line was crossed and Barry did nothing. We'll see what happens when it gets crossed - if it gets crossed - this time around.
:this:
Didn't speak to this firing being a threat, just under the conditions the Executive can respond with military force. An overflight doesn't seem to be much of one.
PsyOps
Pixelated
Not just "fire and fury", but "fire and fury, the like this world has never seen before". Now I don't know about you, but when I think of this kind of fire and fury, I think of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It's interesting how when the guy is on 'our' side, we tend to turn a blind eye to their words. And those were some pretty strong words.
No, what is interesting is your stubborn refusal to face the fundamental fact of the matter: The fat crazy kid has not crossed the line yet.
When did you become such a fan of massive military strikes by the US?
This_person
Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to parse his words, but I really don't think his "line in the sand" has been crossed yet. If it is, and he does nothing like Obama did with Syria, I will be right there with you.
:shrug:
I'm just not there yet.
PsyOps
Pixelated
Something we've had close eyes on for some time...were I to hazard a guess.
Don't fret...the crazy fat kid might yet still cause all the hell and firestorm you are so incredibly anxious to see.
I still prefer "shock and awe."
PsyOps
Pixelated
Something we've had close eyes on for some time...were I to hazard a guess.
Don't fret...the crazy fat kid might yet still cause all the hell and firestorm you are so incredibly anxious to see.
Why is this so hard for you people to get?
"North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States, they will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen"
His own words. Will you please define for me what a "threat" is, if it's not NORK saying they are targeting Guam next?
Restitution
New Member
Gonna have to handle you with Midnightrumprider gloves I guess....
Please see my reply #34 for further guidance
PsyOps
Pixelated
Gonna have to handle you with Midnightrumprider gloves I guess....
Please see my reply #34 for further guidance
Handle me however you wish. I happen to hold my president accountable to his words. I support Trump in his agenda, but I'm not some Trump lemming either, where I just pretend his words really don't mean what that say.
In light of your post #34, my question to you is: When Trump says something, does he really mean what he's saying; or should we just kind of shrug it off as meaningless?
Restitution
New Member
You trust that your President is handling these matters in the most appropriate and best way possible. PERIOD! Just because he hasn't launched nukes the second after fat boy made his announcement does NOT mean things aren't being handled.
Now... would you care to answer MY question(s)?
Restitution
New Member
Yes BUT... it's not Trump so...... :shrug:
China, Iran or Russia.