Who are the real groomers?
- Thread starter StmarysCity79
- Start date
No, that is not rape. Show me any law that says it is. It might be possible that she was the initiator of the act, would she be the rapist?
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
"Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034"
I will await your apology
If that was the only case he was discussing then why did he repeatedly vote against raising the age of marriage for children last year?
"in 2018, Moon opposed a bill that raised the legal age to marry with parental consent from 15 to 16 in Missouri."
Last edited:
CPUSA
Well-Known Member
My GOD you are one retarded CoUNT....
Keep highlighting RINOs while completely burying your head in the sand to ACTUAL pedophiles that you support...
You are one useless, washed up crackwhore...
§566.067 is a statute on "child molestation in the 1st degree"; §566.071 is child molestation in the 4th degree; §566.034 is "statutory rape" in the second degree if being twenty-one years of age or older, he or she has sexual intercourse with another person who is less than seventeen years of age.
Now, show the law that calls what Moon was speaking to as being rape.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
You don't believe child molestation is rape if it results in pregnancy?
You are a sick person defending any type of sexual contact with a minor but keep going on about those scary drag queens pervert.
566.067. Child molestation, first degree, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of child molestation in the first degree if he or she subjects another person who is less than fourteen years of age to sexual contact and the offense is an aggravated sexual offense.
gemma_rae
Well-Known Member
Oooh! Extra salty!
What I believe isn't an issue, the issue is YOU referencing statutes that aren't classified as RAPE (except for the statutory rape statute which doesn't apply to Moon's example). And show me where I was defending anyone for anything. What I was doing was pointing out your BS.
Conflate, lie and try to confuse the issue and that is your typical MO and what a sick person does.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
566.032. Statutory rape and attempt to commit, first degree, penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of statutory rape in the first degree if he or she has sexual intercourse with another person who is less than fourteen years of age.
I'm not sure why this issue is so confusing for you.
I bet a drag queen would have an easier time agreeing that impregnating a 12 year old is rape.
But hey a Republican not understanding that is becoming commonplace.
So again I will ask who are the real groomers?
People like you defending laws that endanger children or people like moon voting on those laws?
You are trying to squirm your way out of what you said (I guess you will go back and edit your comments that have already been quoted). Moon said that his reference to the couple he was talking about is where a 12 year old impregnated a person of similar age. You calling it rape doesn't make it so - See Missouri statutes - https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneChapter.aspx?chapter=566 note that each segment is labeled. Using your logic (or lack there of) both would be guilty of that offense since both were under 14.
The real groomers are the ones you defend. The ones suggesting teachers can facilitate the transition from one sex to another and keep it secret from the parents, the ones that think explicit sexual literature is appropriate for children not ready to comprehend such things.
And finally, I haven't expressed any defense for these laws. As it isn't my business, it is Missourians that need to address it if they see it as a problem.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints can refuse to answer questions or turn over documents under a state law that exempts religious officials from having to report child sex abuse if they learn of the crime during a confessional setting.
Still don't see any drag queens
apnews.com
Still don't see any drag queens
Arizona court upholds clergy privilege in child abuse case
The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints can refuse to answer questions or turn over documents under a state law. The law exempts religious officials from having to report child sex abuse if they learn of the crime during a confessional setting...
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
So they "aren't ready to comprehend these things" but two twelve year old having sex, procreating and then getting married is a - ok?
You are a pervert.
When did i do any of the things you claimed? Suggest teachers help facilitate transitioned? Can you go back and find em saying that. You cna even go back and prove i said two pages ago because you just make up this crap as you go along. and blame me for everything Fox news scares you into believing about democrats.
And yes. they can both be charged with rape under the current statutes
Didn't say any of that, only what the laws are.
Really, how so?
Hell, every exchange you have on here you push that crap.
No, they couldn't.
Have you sent your resume to old Alvin Bragg? With your interpretation and understanding of the law you would fit right in with him.
Last edited:
Rather than blame the messenger. How about pointing those scraggly fingers to where the blame falls.At the people you continually vote for and are only there to line their pockets with this cheap labor.
You seriously have issues identifying the root causes of society ills. That usually points to a college level degree with no experience in the free market. And a belief in all of what your masters have told you since your freshman year at SMCM.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
I agree. However the issues is republicans who support relaxing laws that protect these people and make it easier for business to exploit them.
At the people you continually vote for and are only there to line their pockets with this cheap labor.
You seriously have issues identifying the root causes of society ills. That usually points to a college level degree with no experience in the free market. And a belief in all of what your masters have told you since your freshman year at SMCM.
Which party cut taxes and regulation on business as their first priority in office under Trump?
New UN-backed legal recommendations normalize sex with minors, outraged critics say
'Children may consent to sex with adults. This has been the plan all along,' social media influencer charges
A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nations appears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors.
(Joe Biden and SMC79 Cheer!)
www.foxnews.com
'Children may consent to sex with adults. This has been the plan all along,' social media influencer charges
A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nations appears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors.
(Joe Biden and SMC79 Cheer!)
New UN-backed legal recommendations normalize sex with minors, outraged critics say
A report by the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists with the UN's backing recommends decriminalizing the age of sexual consent, opening the floodgates for sex with minors, say critics.
Yes Tax Cuts that benefited ALL OF US ... and cuts to onerous Regulations
your ilk NEVER talk about which regulations were cut .....
Only that Trump directed a reduction in regulationsyou also act like taxes are raised IN A VACUUM Business pass that shite right on to consumers