Got a cite for the law?We violate our own laws regrading giving aide to a country that is not a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
Got a cite for the law?We violate our own laws regrading giving aide to a country that is not a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
Got a cite for the law?
I think what you are looking for might be in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. But there was a caveat carved out by the Symington Amendment allowing the President to waive sanctions imposed (for a variety of reasons) unless directly overridden by Congressional legislation.For your consideration ...
I can't find it. I read about it, and heard talk of it on the radio, some time ago. There is so much US law concerning the giving of financial aid to foreign countries, it's unreal. But I'll keep searching ....
Whatever - you have the most prejudiced and bigoted views of anyone I've ever talked to in my whole life. And you will likely stay that way until you die. Have fun!
P.S. those "nun habits" are actually called Hijabs and they are cultural in nature. We don't have to agree with them or even like them. Keep living in the 1950's in your own little bigoted world.
I have my own opinions and cannot understand who can watch that poor woman dragged off into that vehicle to be taken to a gang rape until she died and do not feel the same way.; Who can watch that family cowering in fear after they were kidnapped and watched their other daughter murdered. These are not the action of an Army at war. These are the actions of rabid animals who need to put down to the last man.Sonofabitch, I wanted that title. Hijinx, you're a dick!
That being said the rag could double as shiit paper.
Just don't say "crusade." That may trigger the Mohammedans.I have my own opinions and cannot understand who can watch that poor woman dragged off into that vehicle to be taken to a gang rape until she died and do not feel the same way.; Who can watch that family cowering in fear after they were kidnapped and watched their other daughter murdered. These are not the action of an Army at war. These are the actions of rabid animals who need to put down to the last man.
Call it Jihad.Just don't say "crusade." That may trigger the Mohammedans.
Oh I highly approve of women. Women are great. But in Rome do as the Romans. If these women in Burka's and slave scarves want to dress in that garb , they should go back to where the slave garb is acceptable and normal and expected. When the Muslims bring their wives to America they should realize that their wives are expected to become American to speak their minds and wear what they like---like American women. The Muslim men who do not accept this should have stayed where they came from and if they treat their wives like animals and slaves they should be sent back to where they came from. Like I said, we saw what Muslim women wanted to wear when the Shah was in Iran and they were free. Acceptance of slavery is in part exactly that.Acceptance. Our black many of them ran away from slavery, many fought against it, many died as a result, but they are now free ,many of them. Some still live on the plantation the democrats have made for them.@Hijinx -I was referring ONLY to your characterizing Islamic women in this way when you said "We see how they treat their own women---( who seem to enjoy it)--what else can be expected from other women." (I am referring to the bolded section only)
..and then you went on to further demean those women for their clothing choices.
This in no way shape or form means I condone any of the terroristic issues being discussed in this thread. It's bot a trigger for anything - it's an opinion of your opinion of a lot of issues having to do with people (mostly women) you don't approve of.
ha ha like they need a trigger.Just don't say "crusade." That may trigger the Mohammedans.