Originally posted by huntr1
She didn't run a whorehouse, she ran a call girl service. Sheesh.
Originally posted by huntr1
She didn't run a whorehouse, she ran a call girl service. Sheesh.
Pete...you can no longer leave a stack of fresh $50's on the nightstand...Originally posted by Tonio
That difference won't matter to the enraged wives of the clients. A prostitute is a prostitute, no matter if she earns $20 a night or $2,000.
We WERE living in Frederick at the time.Originally posted by nomoney
Had you scared there for a little bit didn't it?
Originally posted by Chasey_Lane
Pete...you can no longer leave a stack of fresh $50's on the nightstand...
Originally posted by pixiegirl
and therefor she can't see you anymore.
Originally posted by vraiblonde
You gotta hand it to Jennifer Dougherty (she's a Democrat, btw). This "black book" was supposed to contain the names of several Republican political figures including Jim Grimes, who was mayor before Dougherty. She wouldn't release the book because she snubs sex scandals and has no interest in a partisan smear campaign. When the court ordered her to release the books, she said, "Fine" and didn't make a big deal out of it.
Originally posted by Tonio
That difference won't matter to the enraged wives of the clients. A prostitute is a prostitute, no matter if she earns $20 a night or $2,000.
The article said $100.Originally posted by Toxick
$2,000 a night?
Holy friggin' crap.
From what I remember of last night's news I think you have to view it at the court house.Originally posted by cmcdanal
The article said $100.
So, where's this list. Like Huntr said, we were living in Frederick when this happened. I wonder if there is anyone I know on the list.
Civil Rights violation? How is a person conducting a criminal business that logs her clients names and payments received from them (also criminals in this state) violating anyone’s civil rights? What right has been violated?Originally posted by justin anemone
I'm surprised the ACLU isn't jumping all over this, calling it a violation of civil rights!
The cases the ACLU gets into all make since, not necessarily the side that they take. To me it would make no sense to get involved amongst all of these criminals.Originally posted by justin anemone
That's what I'm sayin'...
Who says it has to make sense for the ACLU to claim civil rights violations?
Originally posted by Ken King
The cases the ACLU gets into all make since, not necessarily the side that they take. To me it would make no sense to get involved amongst all of these criminals.
I think this very comment started a flame war last week, I could be wrong but...Originally posted by justin anemone
"when you lie down with dogs..."