Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president

[Hank]

Judicial Watch Finds 1.8 Million 'Extra' Voters

More than 350 U.S. counties have voter registration rates exceeding the number of people eligible to vote, resulting in 1.8 million 'extra' voters, according to a new Judicial Watch study.

freebeacon.com

Washington Free Beacon?? Yeah, all that was debunked. Might wanna do more research.

 

[PsyOps]

I want to make sure my sources are on your list so you don't scream "fake news"...

The point is, you can't trust sources on either side of an issue. I think it's lazy to make these kinds of claims on both sides without at least providing a source. But, it's also equally easy to say, I read something on FB that had a source that said a source of a source debunked it.

 

[PsyOps]

Washington Free Beacon?? Yeah, all that was debunked. Might wanna do more research.

See, there you go. Because you simply said so. You're running around "Where's your source! Where's your source!" and you provide no source.

 

[Hank]

The point is, you can't trust sources on either side of an issue. I think it's lazy to make these kinds of claims on both sides without at least providing a source. But, it's also equally easy to say, I read something on FB that had a source that said a source of a source debunked it.

I don't believe anything I see on Facebook. I said Vrai's claim was a meme going around on FB

 

[PsyOps]

I don't believe anything I see on Facebook

Yet you used it as a source.

 

[Hank]

See, there you go. Because you simply said so. You're running around "Where's your source! Where's your source!" and you provide no source.

That's why I am asking you for a list of sources you approve of. So far we have the Washington Free Beacon.

 

[PsyOps]

That's why I am asking you for a list of sources you approve of. So far we have the Washington Free Beacon.

I'm not doing your homework for you. If you feel it's been debunked, it's incumbent upon you to provide a source to back it up.

 

[Hank]

Yet you used it as a source.

No I didn't. I saw the stupid meme and did the research. It wasn't a source to me, it was just another idiotic meme.

 

[Hank]

I'm not doing your homework for you. If you feel it's been debunked, it's incumbent upon you to provide a source to back it up.

I'm just asking for your list of approved sources. I'm not asking you to do my homework. What's the big deal with providing me with a list?

 

[PsyOps]

No I didn't. I saw the stupid meme and did the research. It wasn't a source to me, it was just another idiotic meme.

When you cite it, that's called 'using a source'. Come on Hank, you can do better.

 

[PsyOps]

I'm just asking for your list of approved sources. I'm not asking you to do my homework. What's the big deal with providing me with a list?

I don't necessarily trust any sources. They all have agendas. I did a search, found the Free Beacon, which used a Judicial Watch (who I do trust) study to show questionable numbers. Free Beacon is simply a messenger of the actual source. So, the ball is back in your court... you said it was debunked. Provide your source that told you this.

 

[Hank]

When you cite it, that's called 'using a source'. Come on Hank, you can do better.

Ok, fine... I guess in a roundabout way it could be deemed a source... I don't go to facebook for any pertinent information.

 

[PsyOps]

Ok, fine... I guess in a roundabout way it could be deemed a source... I don't go to facebook for any pertinent information.

 

[Hank]

I don't necessarily trust any sources. They all have agendas. I did a search, found the Free Beacon, which used a Judicial Watch (who I do trust) study to show questionable numbers. Free Beacon is simply a messenger of the actual source. So, the ball is back in your court... you said it was debunked. Provide your source that told you this.

All the main fact checkers. Pick one. See, that's why I asked who you trust. Do you trust any of the fact checking sites?

 

[Monello]

I was thinking it was a bunch of mail in votes from people that wouldn't usually vote, but those numbers seem damn impossible.

I believe that a large number of votes were reengineered away from Trump to Biden. It could be done by a sort of salami slicing technique. Every 100 or so votes, the machine changes 1 vote. Given the number of votes cast, the votes changed is enormous.

Also the number of votes cast when compared to other presidential elections is suspect.

Over 158 million votes were cast at > 66% of eligible voters. In 2016, 136,700,000 votes were cast for president. 129 million votes in 2012 election.

 

[Monello]

When you cite it, that's called 'using a source'. Come on Hank, you can do better.

Maybe not.

 

[PsyOps]

All the main fact checkers. Pick one. See, that's why I asked who you trust. Do you trust any of the fact checking sites?

I don't have a reason to trust any of them. In this instance of 'voter fraud', what makes them more superior to the source they're questioning? How do they have better access to the election data than Judicial Watch? What do you know that would cause me to trust one over the other?

You and I, and rest of the forumites, are just people at the low end of the information totem pole that there is no way to know who is really telling us the truth and who is lying to us. Most of it boils down to bias and choosing to believe what we read. So, I'm inclined to approach nearly everything with a skeptical mind.

But, when you start throwing around "where's your source", then refuse provide your own, you just look foolish.

 

[Hank]

I don't have a reason to trust any of them. In this instance of 'voter fraud', what makes them more superior to the source they're questioning? How do they have better access to the election data than Judicial Watch? What do you know that would cause me to trust one over the other?

You and I, and rest of the forumites, are just people at the low end of the information totem pole that there is no way to know who is really telling us the truth and who is lying to us. Most of it boils down to bias and choosing to believe what we read. So, I'm inclined to approach nearly everything with a skeptical mind.

But, when you start throwing around "where's your source", then refuse provide your own, you just look foolish.

Fact check: Posts claiming more votes than residents in Milwaukee, Detroit, Lansing and Pittsburgh give incorrect numbers

Weeks after major news outlets called the 2020 presidential race for Joe Biden, posts circulating on social media allege that more votes were cast than there are residents in Milwaukee, Wis., Detroit, Mich., Lansing, Mich. and Pittsburgh, Pa. – four blue cities in battleground states that...

www.reuters.com

Fact check: States don't have more than 100% voter turnout in an election

A post uses outdated data to argue there are more votes than registered voters in key battleground states. Data shows no state exceeds 100% turnout.

www.usatoday.com

Fact check: Trump's bogus claim of more votes in Detroit than people

The info in the president's tweets was labeled by Twitter as being disputed.

www.nbcnews.com

Do Hundreds of Counties Have 1.8 Million 'Ghost Voters' in the US?

A study published by the activist legal group Judicial Watch used two different types of data to make a comparison.

www.snopes.com

Trump’s false claim of more votes than people who voted

In a late-night tweet, President Donald Trump highlighted an election statistic that he thought ought to raise eyebrows.

www.politifact.com

Wisconsin has not counted more votes than there are registered voters

CLAIM: Wisconsin has “3,129,000 registered voters,” but counted 3,239,920 votes. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. According to the Wisconsin Elections Commission , the state had 3,684,726 active registered voters as of Nov. 1. As of Wednesday afternoon, there had been nearly 3.3 million ballots...

apnews.com

 

[vraiblonde]

Washington Free Beacon?? Yeah, all that was debunked. Might wanna do more research.

And there ya go. That's why I'm not going to waste any time running down sources for you to scoff at because your masters told you to.

 

[PeoplesElbow]

When a county has x-number of residents and there were more votes than that counted, a brainiac like me would take that to mean that more people voted in the county than actually live there.

I don't think any were that bad. Unfortunately people need to stop with that narrative because it allows them to be painted as nutjobs at worst and just wrong at best.

When trying to prove something like this it's best to stick to facts and numbers that can't be refuted.