HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
I wonder if The Fat Guy will issue a commemorative “Perp Walk NFT” — complete with Christ carrying the cross metaphorical imagery — to grift his mouth-breathing supporters?
Will Trump Be Arrested or go to Jail?
- Thread starter TPD
- Start date
BOP
Well-Known Member
Well, Brandon did say sometime back that Trump wasn't gonna make it to the White House in 2024.
Biden suggests Trump will ‘not take power’ again if he runs in 2024
President Biden on Wednesday suggested that if former President Trump opts to run in 2024, he would not make it to the White House for a second term. Biden’s comments come just two days after Trump…
thehill.com
BOP
Well-Known Member
View attachment 169478 View attachment 169478
The MAGA tears are delicious.
Cry, bitch. Cry!
“If they can do to this to our lord and savior imagine what they can do to you!
The fat guy is truly unhinged on “Truth (LOL) Social”. Loving it!
What a stunad.
BOP
Well-Known Member
True enough. However, if Jan 6th should have taught us nothing, it should have taught us that the Demonrats don't mind keeping people locked away forever without a trial. I'm afraid that if they take Trump into custody, that's exactly what they'll do to him.
You know, when Bush - or Trump - ever forecast that something wasn't going to go in the Democrat's favor - say, an election - the dembots immediately went to town assuming he'd done something illegal to thwart it.Well, Brandon did say sometime back that Trump wasn't gonna make it to the White House in 2024.
Biden suggests Trump will ‘not take power’ again if he runs in 2024
President Biden on Wednesday suggested that if former President Trump opts to run in 2024, he would not make it to the White House for a second term. Biden’s comments come just two days after Trump…
I've got this mantra I recite when we watch cop and detective shows - someone hears a knock at the door, and the person in the shot grabs their gun and takes a peek - and typically, it's not an enemy. What I say is, idiot, bad guys DON'T KNOCK (usually).
They kick in the door, guns blazing. Occasionally when they need to be sneaky, they will do something, but most times they shoot up the window, bust in the door. They do not ASK to be let in.
When people do something illegal, they don't typically announce to the world the outcome of their skullduggery. So when someone says "he won't win Georgia" or "he won't win Florida" it's probably NOT the same as saying "the fix is already IN, morons".
Unless you're Joe Biden of course - then you never know what he's going to say. However, unless he's READING it, it usually doesn't make sense.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
It's pretty funny a group of people known for chanting "Lock her up" to the last Democratic candidate despite no charges or indicments is now crying everything from election interference to Deep state when their leader is facing jail
Oh karma is truly delicious.
Oh karma is truly delicious.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Seems like a pretty appropriate response regarding someone who showed they are willing to steal an election by any means necessary.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Why are you upset about insurrectionists who attacked our capitol and gouged out the eye of a police officer ?
I thought you guys backed the blue and supported law and order?
Do you believe Trump is above the law?
PJay
Well-Known Member
Clem72
Well-Known Member
I think the difference here is that they came out and said "she did it, and it's a crime, but we're not going to prosecute" vs with trump they said "we don't know if he did it, or if it's a crime, but we're sure as hell going to prosecute".
FBI Director James Comey said:
Last edited:
Tech
Well-Known Member
If he slaps an Asian on the way in, will Bragg let him go?
You have no idea. I'm sure you are confusing it with cum.
BOP
Well-Known Member
They totally were, though; they had cameras and cell phones.
Hell, that's enough to bring down the most powerful nation on earth, right there!
So we have Sunny Hostin on The View coming out and saying, in front of God and everyone, that it doesn't even matter if Trump even committed a crime, they have to keep him from eve getting back into the White House. Well, that settles it. It has NOTHING to do with him ever committing a crime. They just don't like him, and are content with abusing the justice system to stop him - rather than, you know, just letting voters decide.
That doesn't surprise me - at all. During his first impeachment - the one where they actually attempted to have public events and testimony rather than rushing it through behind closed doors, cherry-picking witnesses and utterly refusing cross examination of any kind - as in the second - it came out rather clearly that Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes and Misdemeanours doesn't mean a g-d damned thing to them - they can vote him out for any reason.
Which - and I'm no constitutional scholar - seems to point to what they have in parliamentary systems - a "no confidence" vote, where they can vote out a prime minister because he butters his bread wrong. I thought the whole POINT of impeachment was to remove someone who has abused their office, and that certainly indicates, CRIMES were committed. So far, that's been the standard, and we have removed OTHER persons from office - just not Presidents. Well, nope. According to the testimony given then, they believe that Misdemeanours can mean, any kind of public offense, criminal or not.
Well that certainly squares with Clinton's impeachment and Byrd's public remarks that yes, he DID commit impeachable offenses, and yes they DID rise to the level of removal from office - but he said - right on TV in no way misinterpreted - that removing him from office would be bad for the country. So he voted to acquit.
Is this what we have? Is this, what our system has come to, that you can no longer leave it to the voters to choose? Because they might pick someone you find odious?
Well, did anyone ask ME how I felt about Clinton - both of them - or Obama?I thought they did - at the voting booth.
That doesn't surprise me - at all. During his first impeachment - the one where they actually attempted to have public events and testimony rather than rushing it through behind closed doors, cherry-picking witnesses and utterly refusing cross examination of any kind - as in the second - it came out rather clearly that Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes and Misdemeanours doesn't mean a g-d damned thing to them - they can vote him out for any reason.
Which - and I'm no constitutional scholar - seems to point to what they have in parliamentary systems - a "no confidence" vote, where they can vote out a prime minister because he butters his bread wrong. I thought the whole POINT of impeachment was to remove someone who has abused their office, and that certainly indicates, CRIMES were committed. So far, that's been the standard, and we have removed OTHER persons from office - just not Presidents. Well, nope. According to the testimony given then, they believe that Misdemeanours can mean, any kind of public offense, criminal or not.
Well that certainly squares with Clinton's impeachment and Byrd's public remarks that yes, he DID commit impeachable offenses, and yes they DID rise to the level of removal from office - but he said - right on TV in no way misinterpreted - that removing him from office would be bad for the country. So he voted to acquit.
Is this what we have? Is this, what our system has come to, that you can no longer leave it to the voters to choose? Because they might pick someone you find odious?
Well, did anyone ask ME how I felt about Clinton - both of them - or Obama?I thought they did - at the voting booth.
BOP
Well-Known Member
I was at an eatery yesterday and saw that. I even remarked to my neighbor that it's bad when even the left admits this is all designed to keep Trump out of the White House, and not on any actual wrong-doing.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Can you show me where any of that happened beyond you fantasy world?
Wasn't Trump in charge the following four years. If as you claim Biden ahs the power to direct someone to indict Trump why wouldnt Trump have used that same power to arrest Hillary?
And don't scream DEEP STATE!
Hillary Clinton Cleared of Mishandling Classified Information After 3-Year Private Email Probe, Trump So Far Silent
Hillary Clinton Cleared of Mishandling Classified Info in Email Probe
There was "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information," a report said.
www.newsweek.com
:fixed: